Users Online Now:
1,468
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
528,821
Pageviews Today:
689,142
Threads Today:
207
Posts Today:
2,821
06:06 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Magnetic Stars: Rebuttal to Max Planck Institute (Advanced Draft Release: The Grant Chronicles)
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Grant NLI 2199:MV8xOTQ0NDhfMzczNDI0OF84NTdGMzE2Nw==] 3) Your "paper" shows your usual misunderstanding of physics. One minor example: "Currie temperature" applies ONLY to solids, but "I am astrophysics" Grant thinks(???) that it applies to plasmas! Do you have a answer for the flaws in current theories or just a babbling mouth? :wtf: Deacon go back to sleep The Curie point is a term in physics and materials science, named after Pierre Curie (1859-1906), and refers to a characteristic property of a ferromagnetic material. The Curie point, or Curie temperature, Tc, of a ferromagnetic material, is the temperature above which it loses its characteristic ferromagnetic ability: the ability to possess a net (spontaneous) magnetization in the absence of an external magnetic field. At temperatures below the Curie point the magnetic moments are partially aligned within magnetic domains in ferromagnetic materials. As the temperature is increased from below the Curie point, thermal fluctuations increasingly destroy this alignment, until the net magnetization becomes zero at and above the Curie point. Above the Curie point, the material is purely paramagnetic. At temperatures below the Curie point, an applied magnetic field has a paramagnetic effect on the magnetization, but the combination of paramagnetism with ferromagnetism leads to the magnetization following a hysteresis curve with the applied field strength. The destruction of magnetization at the Curie temperature is a second-order phase transition and a critical point where the magnetic susceptibility is theoretically infinite. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curie_temperature [/quote]
Original Message
The most recent draft of Magnetic Stars: Rebuttal to Max Planck Institute is now available for advanced review at [
link to www.grantchronicles.com
] This paper first released on Bad Astronomy's BB yesterday is incomplete and still has some incomplete thoughts, spelling and grammar errors in it until its final release later this week.
Topics Covered:
Fossil Field Theory
Dynamo Theory
Amplified Magnetic Particle Flow
White Dwarf Accretion
Creation of Nebulas
Creation of Stellar Masses
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>