Users Online Now:
1,996
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,724,711
Pageviews Today:
2,386,136
Threads Today:
591
Posts Today:
10,998
06:31 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Magnetic Stars: Rebuttal to Max Planck Institute (Advanced Draft Release: The Grant Chronicles)
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Bored Huge Krill nli 55138:MV8xOTQ0NDhfMzczODA0Nl8yQjk1NzdCNg==] "Is it nonsense, can you recreate conditions here on Earth, no. Have our instruments detected nebulas capable of creating immense magnetic fields without a source of energy? Are you trying to apply a dynamo theory to a cloud of gas? Is the motion organized in a nebula, no, what would the gravitational reference of rotation. If the cloud is expanding then charges would be dissipating. Listen to yourself Krill." Obviously we haven't recreated the conditions here on Earth - except in a simulation, which is the best we can practically do. You still haven't addressed the central point - your misapplication of ferromagnetism to a cloud. Everything you derive from that is nonsense. The two competing theories under discussion are dynamo based or fossil field based. One is based on a mechanically rotating charged cloud, the other (as far as I understand it, but I'm willing to be corrected) on a resonant stable electromagnetic wave (which itself moves the charged particles around, but in an oscillatory fashion). Incidentally, it doesn't show the overall electromagnetic energy increasing - it shows the overall energy decreasing due to resistive effects in the conductive cloud. Neither has anything to do with ferromagnetism, and hence your criticism of either as not conforming to the principles of ferromagnetism is nonsense. When are you going to stop blowing smoke and acknowledge this? Regards Krill [/quote]
Original Message
The most recent draft of Magnetic Stars: Rebuttal to Max Planck Institute is now available for advanced review at [
link to www.grantchronicles.com
] This paper first released on Bad Astronomy's BB yesterday is incomplete and still has some incomplete thoughts, spelling and grammar errors in it until its final release later this week.
Topics Covered:
Fossil Field Theory
Dynamo Theory
Amplified Magnetic Particle Flow
White Dwarf Accretion
Creation of Nebulas
Creation of Stellar Masses
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>