Users Online Now:
2,147
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,195,300
Pageviews Today:
1,995,970
Threads Today:
823
Posts Today:
14,269
07:13 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 6706547:MV8yMzk5MTk3XzQxMTAxMzk2XzZDNDhGRTE2] [quote:Anonymous Coward 45581443:MV8yMzk5MTk3XzQxMTAwNzQyXzYxM0U4QkZC] You mention CGI, so let me give you a good rule of thumb to work off of. If a shot involves a computer-generated element that must be added to real footage, and the camera is moving, that footage has to be motion tracked. This means using a program to place tracker "dots" on features of the scene that are solid and unmoving to approximate the camera motion and recreate it on the computer. For this reason, if all you can see is sky/clouds or water (elements that are constantly moving) in a shot, it is damn near impossible to motion track it, making CGI unlikely. Now, it could be 100% CGI, but recreating hand-held camera motion like that is not a simple task, nor something for beginners or basic hoaxers. So whatever it is, it's probably legitimate footage. [/quote] Your logic is sound, and you obviously know your cgi. My question to you is if it were 100% cgi, and considering the clarity isn't the greatest, could they be filming a good hd monitor at the right fps with a handheald camera? :spock: [/quote]
Original Message
Not sure what to think about this one. What say you? Real or CGI? I saw an actual triangle at close range in 2008. Flew right past my wife and I at treetop level. It looked to be an isosceles triangle though, while the one on the vid is equilateral.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>