Users Online Now:
1,241
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
55,169
Pageviews Today:
99,689
Threads Today:
47
Posts Today:
514
12:55 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Partial crustal shift and the Sun / earth , Updated Catastrophe video pg. 114
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:storm2come:MV8zOTYzMTAxXzcxNzEyMDYxX0QzMEVEQjE2] Just to consolidate the information for those joining the discussion late. [quote:storm2come:MV8zOTYzMTAxXzhFNzU2QkY4] I have a theory based on observations about earth crustal displacement theory, that has to do with the electromagnetic connection with the sun, and the geology of the earths crust. The concept of pole shift is not a new one, and I am familiar with the theories of Hapgood and Vilikovski. My theory is only different in magnitude, and scale. I believe that the earths crust can shift regionally and in places where the crust is thicker or thinner, or where the crust is under tension. :tectonic move: The recent discoveries of the planets electromagnetic connection to the sun has been proven to cause earthquakes, this has long been the theory but now science has caught up. As[b] we are now going through a magnetic pole shift, which is weakening the earths magnetosphere[/b] and making the earth more susceptible to the suns effects, [b]we can also now detect neutral matter being ejected from the earths outer mantel[/b] and can expect to start seeing stresses on weak geographical regions of the earths crust. Looking at the geology of the earths crustal plates at the boundaries we can see where the plates are sinking and where they are rising. The plates differ in thickness randomly, but through observation we could determine where the weakest and most likely breaks could occur. Much like an ice shelf breaks away from Antarctica these [b]random pieces of crust would only need to slip a little to cause a major catastrophe,[/b] as we have seen when there is a major slip of faults these would create an entirely new fault line in the crust rising or falling hundreds of feet and could be very large pieces. :supergwave: Recent research of solar micro nova proves that our sun could be over due, and I believe that the reason our magnetic poles are wondering and the sun is so quiet is because these are precursors to the event. Based on the predicted date of when our magnetic poles reach a 40 degree angle and the time of solar cycle 25's escalation period [b]The earths crust could float on a layer of electromagnetic plasma[/b] during which the areas affected could be displaced by the plasma comprised of neutral matter and solar radiation. I believe we have between 6 to 10 years before the next major shift. "Several studies have shown, for example, that cosmic rays impact cloud formation leading to greater cloud covers during solar minima. While the energy of cosmic rays is absorbed by other particles when they collide in the Earth’s atmosphere, these[b] “cascade particles” take on the momentum and energy of the cosmic rays and reach the Earth’s surface, and along with surviving cosmic rays, penetrate into the Earth’s crust extending the cascade effect deep into the earth’s mantle and eventually reaching the core[/b]. Sub-atomic particles which are created as a byproduct of the collision of cosmic rays and air molecules, such as [b]muons and neutrinos, more easily penetrate into the Earth’s mantle and core[/b] due to their smaller cross section. The impact of cosmic rays through their cascading effect can be visualized as a shotgun blast that carries the energy of the primary cosmic rays deep into the Earth’s interior through “cascade particles” and their sub-atomic byproducts. [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIayxqk0Ees&feature=youtu.be[/youtube] The penetration of cosmic rays into the Earth’s surface has had the effect of [b]triggering seismic activity and volcanic eruptions, as confirmed by a team of four Japanese scientists. In a June 2011[/b] study of 11 volcanic eruptions titled “Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays”, the scientists found that cosmic rays were a factor in triggering nine of the eruptions: It is well known that the cosmic-ray flux is negatively correlated with solar magnetic activity, as the strong magnetic field in the solar wind repels charged particles such as galactic cosmic rays that originate from outside of the solar system. The strong negative correlation observed between [b]the timing of silica-rich eruptions and solar activity can be explained by variations in cosmic-ray flux arising from solar modulation. [/b]The Japanese study confirms that cosmic rays, through their cascade effect, do have an influence inside the Earth’s interior. The critical question is: “how deep into the Earth’s interior do cosmic rays penetrate?” Studies show that the energy transmitted by cosmic rays can be carried deep into the Earth’s interior: [b]During solar minimum high energy cosmic radiation can penetrate to a very deep distance below the Earth’s surface, in some case a few hundred kilometers.[/b] This is the reason why most if not all earthquakes during solar minimum are deep earthquakes."- Michael Salla. "If the Earth’s core is being stimulated by cosmic rays into [b]emitting neutral matter in analogous manner to a Coronal Mass Ejection by the sun,[/b] is there any evidence of this occurring? The most compelling sign would be if the Earth’s core, like the sun, was observed to be emitting cosmic rays. Indeed, this has occurred with cosmic ray detectors discovering cosmic rays coming out of the Earth, rather than penetrating into it. Cosmic rays observed to be coming out of Antarctica were first detected in January 2007 when the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) balloon experiment began, as explained by the science writer, Emma Fiala: Using sensors, ANITA began detecting high energy neutrinos interacting with the ice sheet below….During ANITA’s time in the Antarctic, it detected never before seen[b] “upward-pointing cosmic-ray-like events.”[/b] The rays detected had horizontal planes of polarization, which may suggest they didn’t originate in space. Cosmic rays coming out of the Antarctic ice sheets were observed again by ANITA in December 2016 and sparked intense scientific speculation over whether a new type of particle had been discovered. This led to a team of scientists at Penn State University studying the ANITA data, and on September 25, 2018, releasing released their report about the anomalous 2007 and 2016 events which was published on the scholarly archive, arxiv.org:" It should be noted that on both January 2007 and December 2016, the sunspot numbers were respectively at or near the solar minimum for sunspot activity. Consequently, it should be noted that at the same time as cosmic rays were peaking as they were coming into our solar system due to minimal solar activity, [b]that Cosmic-like rays were observed to be coming out of the Earth. [/b] Links.. https://exonews.org/cosmic-rays-as-triggers-for-solar-flashes-earth-core-eruptions-pole-shifts/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cataclysmic_pole_shift_hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_margin http://www.the-science-site.com/crustal-plates.html http://sites.northwestern.edu/sethstein/tectonic-setting-of-the-august-2011-virginia-earthquake/ http://spaceweathernews.com/ https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02747.pdf Time-variable electromagnetic planet-star interaction [/quote] [quote:storm2come:MV8zOTYzMTAxXzcxNjg0MDk4X0NFNkQ5MTc1] This is from my other thread and shows that part of a crustal plate can break away during these cycles of 12,000 years. Mu, as a lost Pacific Ocean continent, was later popularised by James Churchward (1851–1936) in a series of books, beginning with Lost Continent of Mu, the Motherland of Man (1926),[2] re-edited later as The Lost Continent Mu (1931).[8] Other popular books in the series are The Children of Mu (1931), and The Sacred Symbols of Mu (1933). :MuMap: Churchward gave a vivid description of Mu as the home of an advanced civilization, the Naacal, which flourished between 50,000 and[b] 12,000 years ago[/b], was dominated by a “white race",[8]:48 and was "superior in many respects to our own".[8]:17 At the time of its demise, about 12,000 years ago, Mu had 64,000,000 inhabitants and many large cities, and colonies on the other continents. Churchward claimed that the landmass of Mu was located in the Pacific Ocean, and stretched east–west from the Marianas to Easter Island, and north–south from Hawaii to Mangaia. He claimed that [b]according to the creation myth he read in the Indian tablets, Mu had been lifted above sea level by the expansion of underground volcanic gases. [/b]Eventually Mu "was completely obliterated in almost a single night":[8]:44 after a series of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, "the broken land fell into that great abyss of fire" and was covered by "fifty millions of square miles of water."[8]:50 [b]I believe the "underground volcanic gases" were a highly viscous form of magma destabilized by a micro nova. The earths crust could float on a layer of electromagnetic plasma during which the areas affected could be displaced by the plasma comprised of neutral matter and solar radiation.[/b] :precrust: :muria: Churchward claimed that Mu was the common origin of the great civilizations of Egypt, Greece, Central America, India, Burma and others, including Easter Island, and was in particular the source of ancient megalithic architecture. As evidence for his claims, he pointed to symbols from throughout the world, in which he saw common themes of birds, the relation of the Earth and the sky, and [b]especially the Sun.[/b] Churchward claims that the king of Mu was named Ra and he relates this to the Egyptian god of the sun, Ra, and the Rapa Nui word for Sun, ra’a, which he incorrectly spells "raa."[8]:48 He claimed to have found [b]symbols of the Sun in "Egypt, Babylonia, Peru and all ancient lands and countries – it was a universal symbol."[8]:138 [b]In many myths, we always can find a grain of truth, the ancient cultures around the world have their own variations. but many if not all revolve around 12,000 to 9500 years ago and many have stories of floods, earthquakes, and land rising or falling, weather you believe it or not, a micro nova, and a magnetic pole flip will happen soon. it's time[/b] [/b]Churchward attributed all megalithic art in Polynesia to the people of Mu. He claimed that symbols of the sun are found "depicted on stones of Polynesian ruins", such as the stone hats (pukao) on top of the giant moai statues of Easter Island. Citing W.J. Johnson, Churchward describes the cylindrical hats as [b]"spheres" that "seem to show red in the distance", and asserts that they “represent the Sun as Ra.”[8]:138 He also incorrectly claimed that some of them are made of "red sandstone",[8]:89 which does not exist on the island. [/b] So, how much truth is there in the story of Kumari Kandam? According to[b] researchers at India’s National Institute of Oceanography[/b], the sea level was lower by 100 m about 14,500 years ago and by 60 m about 10,000 years ago. Hence, it is entirely possible that there was once a land bridge connecting the island of Sri Lanka to mainland India. As the rate of [b]global warming increased between 12,000 and 10,000 years ago, the rising sea levels resulted in periodic flooding.[/b] [b](Insert what ever version of Fred Flintstone driving a suv here)[/b] This would have submerged prehistoric settlements that were located around the low-lying coastal areas of India and Sri Lanka. Stories of these catastrophic events may have been transmitted orally from one generation to another and finally written down as the story of Kumari Kandam. :Kandam: Mauritia (microcontinent) From Wikipedia, Mauritia was a [b]Precambrian microcontinent that broke away[/b] as India and Madagascar separated some 60 million years ago.[1][2][3] Evidence consists of detrital zircon found in rock (6-million-year-old trachyte).[4] Analyses of the zircon crystals produced dates between 660 and 1,970 million years and are considerably older than the 8.9-million-year-old basalt that constitutes the oldest formations on the island. The zircons are interpreted to have been brought up from buried continental crust as fragments entrained as xenocrysts within the basalt.[5] Interpretation of a linear northwest–southeast gravity anomaly indicates the microcontinent may extend[6] 1,500 kilometres (930 mi) from the Seychelles to Mauritius roughly parallel to the Indian Ocean oceanic ridge.[7] [/quote] [/quote] [/quote] 01-30-2019 update:coffee4: The Galactic Super wave Clock While lying in bed last night I was thinking, I've always done my best thinking in the still of the night while the world is quite and at rest. I was thinking about The Galactic Super wave, Micro Nova, Earth Crustal Displacement Theory, 12,000 year cycles and Sonic Resonance, and how it is all tied together. Using religious text alone is not an option for me, I've always thought of religion like asking a 5 year old to describe a major event that they witnessed. The event they describe can often have a lot of content that can only be interpreted by an adult to understand what they are saying, While lying there the picture started coming together for me and I asked ( Why 12,000 years?) and there it was, a memory of someone quoting the Bible saying, " 1 hour in Heaven is a 1000 years on Earth". they should have said 1 day. 2 Peter 3:8 8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The clock cycles referred to by Dr. Vogt. I took this and stepped back to look at the problem from a new perspective and began to see the puzzle pieces fall together. The Galactic Super wave is the chime or gong heard at 12 o'clock. :gongwave: Looking at the vela noa again I see a gong on a boat and boats travel on what? waves. So a sound instrument traveling on waves. :agncgj: :agnboat: Then I thought about timing, when could this event have happened , Because if we knew exactly when then it's just a matter of calculating. It was at this point I began thinking of the Mayan calendar and Stonehenge as clocks rather than calendars, and that the most accurate clocks revolve around astronomy. :aztk cal: :stonheng: The effects of what will happen are in our geologic records, a micro nova is the sun shedding used material, like rust flaking off a red hot steal ball bearing when struck by a blacksmiths hammer. The coronal holes we see on the surface of the sun are that rust, and will be shed off like a giant CME. :hamrstik: If we are in the path we will get hit by a cloud of ejecta most of which will burn up in the atmosphere, just falling to earth like sparks and embers from a hammer strike with the larger ones causing some ground fires I believe that it is the electromagnetic sonic shockwave that will cause disruptions on earths surface. [/quote] [/quote]
Original Message
UPDATE JAN 06, 2024
[
link to www.weather.gov (secure)
]
from the article: October 25, 2023 – NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) issued a revised prediction for solar activity during Solar Cycle 25 that concludes solar activity will increase more quickly and peak at a higher level than that predicted by an expert panel in December 2019. The updated prediction
now calls for Solar Cycle 25 to peak between January and October of 2024,
with a maximum sunspot number between 137 and 173.
I have been saying this since Jan 25th, 2019(1st page 4th post)
The main reason for my 6 to 10 year time frame has to do with two cycles (of many converging at this time) that have a High Risk time frame.
These are 1. the last 3years of solar cycle 24, and the first 3years of solar cycle 25.
As you can see solar cycle 24 has been very weak, If solar cycle 25 Kicks into gear in the first 36 months, like the past ones have, then that is when the large X-class flares could be bad.
and 2. the predicted date when we will reach the 40 degree point of the Magnetic pole shift, which is now 9 years or less away.
So I'm sticking to 6 to 10 years, just a guess on my part. take it for what you will.
Quoting:
storm2come
Looking at NOAA's Apr 2018 report, we can see that the cycle is varying by 12 to 18 months. Solar cycle 25 was predicted to start in Jan. 2019 following the 11 year solar cycle, But it hasn't begun with very few if any solar spot or flares.
If we are 12 to 18 months behind
the start of solar cycle 25, and it peaks 36 to 40 months after the start. then that would put the peak in 52 to 58 months,
from now Feb 2019, that would put the peak in June of 2024 thru Dec. 2024.
With the magnetic poles accelerating we could have a magnetic pole shift at that time.
[
link to www.swpc.noaa.gov (secure)
]
Because my other link didn't load I found this one from Jan. 2019 it shows that solar cycle 23 bottomed out in Jan. 2010,
this puts the start of solar cycle 25 in Jan 2021 or 12 to 18 months later
and the peak 36 to 40 months after.
Will solar minimum be longer than usual or might solar cycle 25 begin earlier?......
….The previous solar cycle prediction panel’s forecast for solar cycle 24 called for a maximum average sunspot number of 90 to occur in May, 2013. After looking at the actual sunspot numbers and solar activity, it was determined the solar cycle 24 maximum was reached in April, 2014 and peaked at an average sunspot number of 82.....
[less than 50%]
Quoting:
storm2come
Quoting:
storm2come
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>