Users Online Now:
1,496
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
341,986
Pageviews Today:
547,228
Threads Today:
169
Posts Today:
3,218
07:03 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge...
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTIxNDQ3XzUzMjBGOUVB] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTIxMTMzXzFEQzc2OURG] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTIwNTMwXzNCN0JGN0RD] [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTIwMzMwXzNGRjY4QjZF] All of that which your talking about is is LITERALLY described in the video, [b][color=brown]I can't give you 20 minutes of details in 10 seconds,[/color][/b] which is why you won't learn shit and remain a dumb fuck, that is not my problem but yours. [/quote] You don't have to give me 20 minutes of details in 10 seconds, you just have to give me two numbers that, as you claim, are in the video. Again: Distance = 123 miles Observer height = ? meters Target height = ? meters Refraction index = ? (we can use standard refraction since I assume that the video maker didn't measure it) [/quote] As expected: bullshit video #51 Distance = 123 miles Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu) Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto) Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible. The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings. https://www.metabunk.org/curve/ Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity? . [/quote] The mountains should not be visible, if the curve were true (your having a functional disconnect here). But they are, which means, there is no curve. Refraction or not, it would not cause the entire mountain range that would be behind a curve to magically appear over the horizon. Refraction/mirages do not work that way at all. The only thing visible at that camera altitude if we were on a globe, would be a section of the top of the mountains - but instead we can clearly see it way more than just the peak, some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared. It means were not a globe. It's hard to swallow I get it. I don't get why so many refuse to see that, the end result is better anyway and more logical, God is real. Would you rather God not be real and us a random speck like they want to sell you, because the price ain't worth it. [/quote]
Original Message
He eventually came around
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>