Users Online Now:
1,716
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
838,357
Pageviews Today:
1,372,047
Threads Today:
539
Posts Today:
8,661
02:24 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge...
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Astroshill:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NjAyNDYxXzY2OTRCMDdE] [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NjAxNzA3X0M5NUVBMzc5] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTkzNTQxXzY2NThDRjcy] [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg2OTk4X0E5OEUyOTdE] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg1MTAyXzg0M0Y4NTdD] :fesszoom: Prove that it's not the original photo. And again: What would be the difference between a cropped and an uncropped photo? Pray tell, loser. [/quote] Your arguing over nothing, it makes no difference and you know it makes no difference. There is nothing to prove. Again, already showed you how it produces that effect. [/quote] Oh look, Doctor Manhattan is a sock puppet of AC 50592849, or why did he feel the need to answer a post, I directed to AC 50592849? [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg2OTk4X0E5OEUyOTdE] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZ5wo_NKjtQ [color=yellow]1m40s[/color] [/quote] No comment on the 20° problem, no comment on the refraction index problem, no comment on the temperature and barometric pressure problem. It seems, you don't have an answer to the problems. Again: It's the same shit as the video with the coin and the camera below the table. Put the camera in the optical path (centre of the Fresnel lens) and repeat the experiment. Also show the maths that the atmosphere bends the image of the sun more the 20° at sunset by applying the proven refraction index of around 1.0003. And explain how the sunset times are calculated to the second in advance though atmospheric conditions like temperature or air pressure change on a daily and hourly base. [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg2OTk4X0E5OEUyOTdE] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg1MTAyXzg0M0Y4NTdD] "And I'm still waiting for your proof that atmospheric refraction don't apply to near infrared light as you claimed some days ago." [/quote] No one said that at all, all I said was infrared allows us to see further past some layers to get us a CLEARER image [/quote] Oh look, we have a lying piece of shit here: [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTIyODM1X0U5QzA1ODhC] ... [b][color=brown]Refraction means nothing in the infrared video which is the point i was trying to make.[/color][/b] ... [/quote] [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg2OTk4X0E5OEUyOTdE] The proof is on you, linking optical illusions that are EASILY disproved, but backed by Mainstream. We all know how much mainstream lies, so lets just cut the bullshit. If you haven't comprehended fake news and how it works, you're still on level 1. If it applies or not doesn't matter, that is not the point, the point is, YOU SEE TOO FAR, BECAUSE IT IS FLAT, NOT BECAUSE YOUR VIEW BENDS OVER A CURVE TO SEE OBJECTS BEHIND the horizon. If it applied to infrared, it still wouldn't not matter, because WE SEE THE MOUNTAINS WHEN WE SHOULD NOT be able to. BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT BE THERE ON A CURVE. The point of infrared, like other optics is to go past visual layers of atmosphere or highlight certain objects based on temperature For others who missed that video its this one. ]https://youtu.be/KxLwaaU1aNk?t=697 [color=yellow]11m37s[/color] [/quote] I already proved your bullshit video wrong: [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTIxMTMzXzFEQzc2OURG] As expected: bullshit video #51 Distance = 123 miles Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu) Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto) Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible. The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings. https://www.metabunk.org/curve/ Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity? [/quote] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTI4MTQ3XzI4RTM3NDhC] The drop in the refraction index in the visible range of light is just 0.01 per mille: 1.000299 at 400 nm and 1.000291 at 800 nm. https://aty.sdsu.edu/explain/optics/figs/disp_air.gif If you claim that the drop is significant higher in the near infrared range, you have to provide evidence for your claim. Btw.: The camera was not at ground level but at 60 meters (197 feet), a big difference in what you see and what you don't see. And again: If you claim that refraction does not apply in the near infrared range, you have to provide evidence for your claim. We see exactly what we should see given the distance, the observer height and the target height, regardless of visible light or near infrared. [/quote] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTIxOTg4XzY3RjIzODI0] Only if atmospheric refraction is [b]not[/b] taken into account, only a small part of the mountain should be visible. Unfortunately, for the flattards, atmospheric refraction is real - and applying standard refraction, from the 3302 meter high mountain 1880 meters are hidden and 1422 meters are visible. And, isn't it funny, that it fits with the numbers (in feet) given in the video at 5:00. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxLwaaU1aNk (I hope you can convert meters into feet.) [/quote] [quote:Doctor Manhattan:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg2OTk4X0E5OEUyOTdE] [quote:Hydra:MV80MTAxMjc2Xzc0NTg1MDY3X0EzQ0RCQzQy] Where is the mirage in the video below? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9mRkNNwHjo [/quote] It's right here, https://i.imgur.com/SfKQ1BY.jpg , but you will see a curve, because you want to and are easily fooled by optical illusions, as shown in the video right above. Linking more mirages and .."explain this one"...and "this one" doesn't matter. It's a mirage, the videos explains clearly what mirages are and how they behave. https://youtu.be/0dUGj7FOed0?t=3227 [color=yellow]52m57s[/color] [/quote] So this below is the mirage from your video above at 52:57 :femirage1: And this is the "mirage" from my video (00:54). :femirage2: Yep, the second image with the bribge is really a super-mirage. //sarc - Did you insert the three lines in your image to obfuscate that there is no mirage? The curve is right there in the image above, but you will see a mirage, because you want to and are easily fooled by RubeTube videos, as shown right in the videos you posted. You should join the tards who see men, reptiles or rodents in moon and mars images. You would be an enrichment for these tards with your imagination. . [/quote] The mirror effect is there, theres no point in arguing with someone who doesn't have all there senses in tact. Enjoy your dissonance moron you'll fit in well. Nice try on the reptiles bro, I only believe in shit I can see. [/quote] Well you can plainly see curvature in those photos. :) Have a nice day! [/quote]
Original Message
He eventually came around
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>