Users Online Now:
1,515
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
277,408
Pageviews Today:
441,506
Threads Today:
158
Posts Today:
2,807
04:49 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
TRUMP just RED FLAGGED CUOMO!!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Mkjeep:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjI2NTc1XzYzQUE3Njg0] [quote:Mkjeep:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjI2NDc3XzhDNjY3RDlG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 76871995:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjI2MTc2X0ZEQUE4RkUy] [quote:Mkjeep:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjI1OTIyXzlCMTY0MUU4] [quote:Anonymous Coward 76871995:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjI0NTQxX0U1RTMyOUQ1] [quote:Mkjeep:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjI0MDMwX0RCNkU0RDZG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 76871995:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjIzODk4X0JDOUU0NEQ2] [quote:Mkjeep:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjIzMTE4XzdCOTZGNTUx] [quote:Anonymous Coward 76871995:MV80MTEyNDAyXzc0NjIyNzMzXzYyNDM1NThD] Common sense red-flag guns laws are spreading. Popular in Florida and Indiana (Pence's home state). Conservatives are the majority of gun owners - Trump may be embracing the law for a conservative WIN. IC 35-47-14 https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/indiana/in-code/indiana_code_35-47-14-3 . [/quote] [b]Since when[/b] is another law a win for anyone besides the lawmakers. [/quote] Since the law that stops unwanted and senseless violent multiple deaths in public (mass shooting). There ought to be a law to reduce these incidents and there are in several states. The law is a process law. Innocent law-abiding gun owners need not worry. . [/quote] Like all those laws in States that have stricter gun control that reduce /stop mass shootings and reduce/stop crime with guns? [/quote] Specifically, the red-flag laws like Indiana's linked above. . [/quote] Violation of the 4th amendment, ah ok [/quote] 'upon probable cause' like the dui guy - can't just turn him loose. . [/quote] Umm ok DANGEROUS PERSON (IC 35-47-14-1) - An individual who presents an imminent risk of personal injury to the individual or to another individual; or - An individual who may present a risk of personal injury to the individual or to [b]another individual in the future[/b] and the individual: o Has a mental illness (as defined in IC 12-7-2-130) that may be controlled by medication, and has not demonstrated a pattern of voluntarily and consistently taking the individual's medication while not under supervision; or o Is the subject of documented evidence that would give rise to a reasonable belief that the individual has a propensity for violent or emotionally unstable conduct. WITH A WARRANT (IC 35-47-14-2) - Apply to circuit or superior court with jurisdiction - Prepare sworn affidavit that: o States why the law enforcement officer believes that the individual is dangerous and in possession of a firearm; and o Describes the law enforcement officer's interactions and conversations with:  the individual who is alleged to be dangerous; or  another individual, if the law enforcement officer believes that information obtained from this individual is credible and reliable; o The affidavit specifically describes the location of the firearm - If a court issued a warrant to seize a firearm, the officer must file return within forty-eight (48) hours after the warrant was served that: o Date and time served o The name and address of the individual named in the warrant; o The quantity and description of any firearms seized. (IC 35-47-14-4) WITHOUT A WARRANT (35-47-14-3) - If weapons are seized during the normal course of law enforcement duties - If person is believed to be dangerous (as defined above), submit a written statement to the court of jurisdiction describing basis for belief - Court reviews statement and may order firearms retained or released AFTER FIREARMS ARE SEIZED - Court holds a hearing within 14 days. (IC 35-47-14-5) - Notification to individual from whom the firearm was seized and prosecutor - Court determines by clear and convincing evidence if person is dangerous and firearms should be retained (IC 35-47-14-6) - If retained, law enforcement agency keeps firearm until further order of the court. - Court shall also order License to carry handgun suspended. (IC 35-47-14-6(b)) o Notify ISP Firearms to insure this is completed RETURN OF FIREARMS (IC 35-47-14-8) - Person may petition for return after at least 180 days - If denied at that hearing, must wait at least another 180 days - If five years have passed, hearing may be held to destroy or permanently dispose of firearms (IC 35-47-14-9) SALE OF FIREARM (IC 35-47-14-10) - After order for retention, Person may petition for an order directing LE agency to sell firearm with proceeds (minus 8% administrative costs) to go to individual. My ph is not letting me bold all I want to, but there are clear violations of rights in this law. Waaaay too much leeway in what an officer can say is probable cause. [/quote] Additional code.... Sec. 130. “Mental illness” means the following: (1) For purposes of IC 12-23-5, IC 12-24, and IC 12-26, a psychiatric disorder that: (A) substantially disturbs an individual’s thinking, feeling, or behavior; and (B) impairs the individual’s ability to function. The term includes intellectual disability, alcoholism, and addiction to narcotics or dangerous drugs. (2) For purposes of IC 12-28-4 and IC 12-28-5, a psychiatric disorder that: (A) substantially disturbs an individual’s thinking, feeling, or behavior; and (B) impairs the individual’s ability to function. The term does not include developmental disability. Soo.... it’s up to the officer to determine the mental health of the person red flagged for probable cause as well??? How does he do that? Med records? Is he a psychiatrist/ psychologist? Do you see how far this goes? [/quote]
Original Message
Conversation
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Would Chris Cuomo be given a Red Flag for his recent rant? Filthy language and a total loss of control. He shouldn’t be allowed to have any weapon. He’s nuts!
9:04 AM · Aug 13, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
[
link to twitter.com (secure)
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>