Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,086 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 130,003
Pageviews Today: 226,263	Threads Today: 81	Posts Today: 1,550
03:00 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject Interesting angle on the Whistleblower complaint from James Howard Kunstler

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

Original Message From his Friday blog:

So much material in this tale doesn’t add up that it looks like the results of a math test in a Baltimore middle school. For one thing, the now public whistleblower complaint makes it clear that the whistleblower’s information is second-hand. The Intel Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA) explicitly prohibits complaints based on second-hand news: “In order to find an urgent concern credible, the IGIC [Intel Community Inspector General] must be in possession of reliable, first-hand information. The IGIC cannot transmit information via the ICWPA based on an employee’s second-knowledge of wrongdoing. This includes information received from another person, such as when a fellow employee informs you that he/she has witnessed some type of wrongdoing.”

[link to kunstler.com (secure)]

Pictures (click to insert)