Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,477 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 315,924
Pageviews Today: 893,717Threads Today: 451Posts Today: 8,259
12:35 PM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Subject HAHA 2"ieme : It is a victory for the Trump administration, which has been pushing to eliminate the phrase "sexual and reproductive health&
User Name
Font color:  Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message [link to www.lifesitenews.com (secure)]

Trump admin torpedoes abortion language for second year at UN Security Council

Under the Obama administration, references to "sexual and reproductive health" appeared in two versions of the recurring resolution on Women Peace and Security, promoted by France and other European nations and supported by UN Women and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. This week, the Trump administration was willing to break with the typical practice of reaffirming all previous iterations of the resolution in order to avoid reference to them.

This is the second time in recent months that the Europeans were defeated in attempts to include abortion in the Women Peace and Security agenda. They were stopped in April when the U.S. threatened to veto the last iteration of the resolution.

The US position has changed abortion politics at the UN. The term "sexual and reproductive health" was allowed to proliferate as long as it could be kept ambiguous: pro-life, mostly developing, countries could claim it did not include abortion while still accepting reproductive health funding from donor nations.

The diplomatic bargain of deliberate ambiguity, worked out in the halls of UN negotiating rooms, is not enforced on the ground. Donors, mostly Europeans, who define the term as including abortion, include it in foreign aid. UN agencies and implementing partners use the ambiguity to include abortion even where it is restricted, and to advocate for further liberalization as a matter of rights, though it is not in any UN agency's official mandate or any UN human rights treaty.
Pictures (click to insert)
 | Next Page >>