Users Online Now:
1,691
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,486,382
Pageviews Today:
2,464,834
Threads Today:
923
Posts Today:
16,751
11:47 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Nuclear mortars!?!?!?! Shit's gettin' crazy man.
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:KonspiracyKitty:MV80MTg2MDAwXzc2MTI2NDgzX0VGMTVGQTRD] In the 1950's and 1960's, the United States had lots of low-yield nuclear stuff. Artillery and bombs, a short-range recoilless rifle; things colloquially known as 'tactical nukes'. Then nuclear weaponry below a certain yield was banned to lower the risk of nukes being employed in warfare. Russia was a signatory to this ban. However, while looking this up I came across a lot of news stories from May 2019 suggesting Russia may be carrying out banned nuclear testing with low-yield weapons. So that's not good. But like people said, the artillery piece here is going to be the recipient of a lot of counter-battery fire if the Russian employ this thing against any professional military. [/quote]
Original Message
[
link to www.liveleak.com (secure)
] Wrap your mind around this bullshit.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>