Users Online Now:
2,000
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
699,816
Pageviews Today:
1,122,252
Threads Today:
448
Posts Today:
6,558
12:02 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
THERE ARE TWO CONSTITUTIONS "Act of 1871"? //// Lawyers SURRENDER Their CITIZENSHIP?? ANY LAWYERS IN THE HOUSE??
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:SyncAsFunk:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkyOTgwXzI5NzFBQkM=] [quote:GSB/LTD:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkyNjY5X0VFOTRDOEFC] [quote:SyncAsFunk:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkxNDU5X0Q0ODhFMEU4] [quote:Evangelina:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkxMzY5X0ZBRUFBNUFF] [quote:SyncAsFunk:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkxMzE4X0MyQUMwM0ZG] [quote:Evangelina:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkxMzEzXzU1N0VEQTc3] [quote:SyncAsFunk:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkxMjkxXzcyNkI1QjY0] [quote:Evangelina:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkxMjM3XzYxRTcxNkRC] [quote:SyncAsFunk:MV80MjEwOTMyXzc2NTkxMTk1Xzc3NDAyMTI0] Doesn't matter. [i]“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” [/i] - Marbury vs.Madison, 1803. [i] “Every law consistent with the Constitution will have been made in pursuance of the powers granted by it. Every usurpation or law repugnant to it cannot have been made in pursuance of its powers. The latter will be nugatory and void.”[/i] - Thomas Jefferson, Elliot, p. 4:187-88. [i]“There is no position which depends on clearer principles than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.”[/i] = Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers, #78. etc, etc. [/quote] You're way behind the curve. [/quote] Quite the opposite my dear. :chuckle: [/quote] Do tell darling.. [/quote] I just did. Whooooooooosh. :hf: [/quote] I think I found a picture of you in the future when you Learn Q is The Real Deal https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/1205573020204589056 [/quote] Rabid defensiveness is a sign of deep programming which blocks clear understanding. I didn't post what I did to counter the thread, but to bolster it. Read what I referenced over and over until it sinks in. Or don't. :chuckle: Have a good day. :hf: [/quote] OR, you could simply admit that you're wrong. The case you cited dates from 1803 and multiple rulings rendered it moot. And, The FEDERALIST PAPERS -while lofty reading- had NO legal bearing but were merely a treatise of the time and that's all they remain today. [/quote] Wrong about? Then as now, (k)neel or Stand. Their enduring elegance was in their Natural Simplicity. Creating complications covering for cowering excuses is a (k)neeler's specialty. Have a great day. :) [/quote]
Original Message
[
link to twitter.com (secure)
]
Since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>