Users Online Now:
1,815
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,074,429
Pageviews Today:
1,796,458
Threads Today:
733
Posts Today:
12,182
06:22 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
It’s time to have this discussion in a serious manner
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:justsayin;):MV80Mzk4NjIxXzgwMDc5NzAxX0JENTdFRjZD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 77655149:MV80Mzk4NjIxXzgwMDc5NTU0X0IzQ0UzQkM4] I think the way people think about "simulation" is tainted by The Matrix and computers. What does simulation mean? It's an imitation. What is there to be imitated? Concluding "this world isn't real" doesn't need to imply there is something else real, somewhere else. We can observe field of potentiality and existing "inside" of something without giving reality to an unknowable outer layer. If you view yourself as a person, sure- simulation. The body is a vessel- identification with it is the same as watching a character on a screen. Why would any concept at the level of illusion be anything more than illusion? Rather, the act experiencing through awareness is directly provable with no extras. Nobody has the authority to tell me that I did not observe this sentence being written- it doesn't matter if "I" am real or not. There is no need for you to ponder whether I am real or not- you can only prove that this sentence is being read if you are aware to read it. "Others" may be filled in to support some aspect of your reality concept- there is no proof of their reality beyond the experience meHaha observing them. Ultimately, it is up to each point of awareness to consider the bundle of ideas they will entangle and disentangle from once they form a concept of self. In the same way everything can be reduced to a simple duality (1s and 0s, "me" and "not me"), awareness stripped of its name and form is identical- one. Did history happen, or did it spring into existence step-by-step as needed to support the larger narrative you formed from birth? The implication is to drill down and realize what needs no proof- observing the concept of deep, dreamless sleep is one place to look. Consider what you are, and you may find that it is irrelevant what any of "this" is. I have observed that simulation theory leads individuals to "reject" the presented reality and grab onto something else. Is there a need? Once the theory plays its role, reject it also. [/quote] Haha Brilliant! [/quote]
Original Message
It should be well known by now that we live in a simulation
And we should ponder the ramifications of this realization
For those that choose to turn a blind eye, this isn’t for you
This is for the people with the guts to face the facts
We live in a fucking virtual reality that doesn’t render until the “field of potentiality” is observed by consciousness
Just like a video game
You can’t deny it anymore
I’m sure you are aware of the double slit experiment and there are many more clues concerning the fabric of our existence
It blows my mind that majority just don’t give a damn
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>