Users Online Now:
2,481
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
582,956
Pageviews Today:
978,575
Threads Today:
328
Posts Today:
5,989
11:23 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Federal Appeals COURT throws out CALIFORNIA's communist BAN on LARGE CAPACITY MAGAZINES! Rejoice you 2nd Admendment TARDS!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 79268445:MV80NDg5NTEyXzgxNzgwMDI5XzFFMENDODE1] 9th Circuit Declares "Hi-Cap" Mag Ban Unconstitutional! (Why I Partly Disagree) 15K views TheYankeeMarshal 338K subscribers Timeshare Exit Cancel Services AD infoinsider.net Up next dont_use_this 38:13 Lenny assembles our new Mini5! GlockStore 5.6K views New 12:47 What Will Happen to GUN Rights if Dems/Biden Win Election?!? TheYankeeMarshal 27K views 10:21 I Was WRONG About Wayne LaPierre TheYankeeMarshal 77K views 13:54 9th Circuit Strikes Down California Magazine Ban! GunGuyTV 11K views New 52:50 The Fact-Free Lockdown Hysteria | Thomas E. Woods, Jr. misesmedia 381K views 43:30 What's next with the California ammo ban & the 9th circuit? - Interview with Sam Paredes of GOC GunGuyTV 17K views 9:46 Jay Leno's Lifestyle ★ 2020 Lifestyle & Net Worth Recommended for you 17:05 Gun Gripes #187: "California Magazine Ban Lifted?" Iraqveteran8888 Recommended for you 7:51 FIRST TIME HEARING Phil Collins - In the Air Tonight REACTION TwinsthenewTrend Recommended for you 11:20 Tucker: America was a very different country 7 months ago Fox News 1.6M views 13:38 The 9Barista Espresso Machine Review James Hoffmann Recommended for you 16:46 Ammo Shortage Insights MarksmanTV 13K views New Comments • 286 Add a public comment... Tyler Morrison This should never have been an issue to begin with. It's a shame we should have to get excited about what should have never been. Still good news, as we never want to become, for example, Canada, Jr. 8 hours ago 5 John Smith Are they just going to drag their feet with this too, like they did with the open carry being constitutional? 9 hours ago 5 Ruben Mentaberry Now is time for the CA roster to go away too. 9 hours ago 55 7 Steven Prime Least there be ANY doubts.. Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262: “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622: “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.” Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 1974: Expounds upon Owen Byers v. U.S., 273 U.S. 28 Unlawful search and seizure. Your rights must be interpreted in favor of the citizen. Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616: “The court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured liberties.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436: “Where rights secured (Affirmed) by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425: “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486, 489: “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748: “Waivers of Constitutional Rights, not only must they be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness.” “If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.” —Samuel Adams, 1772 Cohens v. Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821): “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.” Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237, 243: “We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.” S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905): “The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.” [/quote]
Original Message
[
link to www.npr.org (secure)
]
Federal Appeals Court Throws Out California Ban On Large-Capacity Gun Magazines The court on Friday rules that the state's "near-categorical ban of [the magazines] infringes on the fundamental right to self-defense." The decision is a blow to gun control activists.
Friday's ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rolls back California's ban on the sale of ammunition magazines containing more than 10 bullets.
communists
communists
communists
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>