Users Online Now:
2,128
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,390,717
Pageviews Today:
2,301,213
Threads Today:
871
Posts Today:
15,635
10:15 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
After getting the vaccine, has anyone female gotten pregnant?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 79731695:MV80NjgyNjcyXzg1MjUxMjE1X0JEOTAzNjY=] https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210112/why-covid-vaccines-are-falsely-linked-to-infertility ... In early December, a German doctor and epidemiologist named Wolfgang Wodarg, who has been skeptical about the need for vaccines in other pandemics, teamed up with a former Pfizer employee to ask the European Medicines Agency (the European Union counterpart to the FDA) to delay the study and approval of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. One of their concerns was a protein called syncytin-1, which shares similar genetic instructions with part of the spike of the new coronavirus. That same protein is an important component of the placenta in mammals. If the vaccine causes the body to make antibodies against syncytin-1, they argued, it might also cause the body to attack and reject the protein in the human placenta, making women infertile. ... “Utopia premiered on Amazon Prime Video on Sept. 25, 2020,” the spokesperson said in a statement to WebMD. “It was written 7 years ago, and was filmed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The series is based off of the original U.K. version, which premiered in 2013, and shares much of the same plot, including the vaccine storyline.” ... Indeed, data from the human studies of the Pfizer vaccine don’t bear out this theory. In the Pfizer trial, which included more than 37,000 people, women were given pregnancy tests before they were accepted to the study. They were excluded if they were already pregnant. During the trial, 23 women conceived, likely by accident. Twelve of these pregnancies happened in the vaccine group, and 11 in the placebo group. They continued to be followed as part of the study. ... Just so you know: In 2017, a total of 194,377 babies were born to women aged 15–19 years, for a birth rate of 18.8 per 1,000 women in this age group. This is another record low for U.S. teens and a drop of 7% from 2016. Birth rates fell 10% for women aged 15–17 years and 6% for women aged 18–19 years depending on the the age group involved. 37 * 19 = 703 pregnancies would be expected over 1 year, if this trial say was 1 month long, 702/12 is about 58, half being male = 29. Of course the number would go slightly lower with excluding patients that are over the age of child bearing. So it would seem that the paper has no effect on infertility. That being said: I wonder if this is reproducible in the general population. [/quote]
Original Message
This is an mRNA virus. The mRNA needs to enter your cell via a vector of some sort.
The mRNA then needs to be transcribed into protein.
That protein then needs to be released into the blood stream for your immune cells to create antibodies for it.
There is natural degradation of mRNA over time, and there are enzymes located in cells to extend the life of mRNA as well.
So with nearly inert cells like quiescent ovum, does the mRNA stay there longer or doesn't degrade at all? And if so, does it compromise the ovum / egg from being able to be fertile as some proteins and energy is being used for making viral particles?
My major concern is that the cells generally excude these viral particles after they break, could ovum / eggs infected with these subsequently burst and die over time... and if so which ones would be more vulnerable.
See, the difference between men and women is that men's sperm come from progenitors.
Women's eggs are all there before they are adolescents.
So technically, all the eggs that a women will ever have could be potentially compromised whereas a man will make more sperm and should not be compromised.
I think that this will affect fertility, not so much as the anti placental antibody that pfizer was worried about.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>