Users Online Now:
1,378
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
207,595
Pageviews Today:
370,946
Threads Today:
189
Posts Today:
2,745
04:19 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Builder of the Ancient Mysteries documentary, some jaw dropping revelations from the maker of “The Revelation of the Pyramids”
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Ahatmose:MV80NzQzMDkxXzg2NDMyNjE5XzY3QzZFMkZB] [color=orange][b][u]Solving for The Speed of Light at Giza:[/u][/b][/color] Apr 16, 2016 at 11:38pm It appears that all my doodling with numbers has paid off as I have solved a little glitch for Gary Osborn ... [b][u]Please be aware I make no claims to the idea or anything to do with this research he has been undertaking ... I simply solved a math problem ...[/u][/b] Gary has been endeavoring to prove the speed of light was to be found in The Great Pyramid but was having trouble getting the math to fit exactly well wouldn't you just know we have just been working on just this sort of problem and so I solved it for him. Here is my posting from Facebook but first his amazing diagram ... https://imagizer.imageshack.com/a/img924/6584/L9zhJ7.jpg [b][u]Now just to re-emphasize here I simply solved the mathematical part of this ... everything else including the accuracy you see on the diagram was 100% Gary Osborn's.[/u][/b] And now my solution from Facebook ... Gary I was taking another look at your diagram and was trying to figure out an easy way to get it exact for you and so it was that I decided to see what the ratio of the side of the square would be in relationship to the larger circle and found that it was 4.4428829381583662846694512927828 ... Now this number is significant as it is 1/4 of what the circumference would be in a square enclosed by 4. (See my early posts here) It works out to sq rt of 32 x Pi or 17.771531752633464988063523960243 / 4 = 4.4428829381583662470158809900607 or within 0.99999999999999999152496907372266 ... so we need to figure out how to incorporate this value 17.771531752633464988063523960243 (your 1023.... value) and 12.566370614359172953850573533118 (your 723.... value) and keep the difference between them exactly 299.792458 . I am working on it. So large circumference is 4.4428829381583662470158809900607 times side of square (pyramid) and large circumference is sq rt of 2 larger than smaller circumference and difference between 2 circumferences is 299.792458 ... all we have to do is solve this equation smile emoticon So 5.2051611382742920342129504271248 = 299.792458 Working on it ... According to me large circumference = 1023.5554760007664777478882171817 Small circumference = 723.76301800076647774788821718169 Side of square = 230.38092388386081655711403275123 Cheers smile emoticon smile emoticon smile emoticon Like · Reply · 39 mins Makes side in inches ... 9070.1151135378274235084264862689 Equals 755.84292612815228529236887385574 feet ... Accuracy = 100 % !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Every once in a while I stumble onto something that leaves me speechless and wondering how I continue to be led toward .. well who really knows where the heck this will wind up but this latest discovery has to leave everyone's head shaking as it did mine. It started with my obsessive search for a solution to Gary Osborn's light project and had a side bar into the 4th root of Pi and this is what it yielded this time around .. I am still shaking my head over this one . Okay as pointed out in my 4th root of Pi thread we had these measurements to ponder ... All measurements equatorial diameters : Venus / Earth = 0.94885813105388091199001589805178 Mercury / Earth = 0.38248667293822514894951395421762 ====================================================== TOTAL = 1.3313448039921060609395298522694 4th root of Pi = 1.3313353638003897127975349179503 1.3313353638003897127975349179503 / 1.3313448039921060609395298522694 = 0.999993 I decided to see if I could find any other relationships in the planet distances and .. But then my mind wandered, as it is apt to do, back to The 23.5 Degree Problem and I got to thinking how perfect it would have been if the enclosed square had been sq rt of 5 + 1 ... BUT IT DID NOT FIT ! But then I continued and tried to see what the value would be for the squaring of the circle and found that the answer was about 355.53 which was way too large to allow the large circle being Earth and then I decided to try something that unleashed another tsunami. I decided to use not 355.53 but another number that immediately came to mind and that was 353.55339059327376220042218105242 which is the sq rt of 2 divided by 4 x 1000. So instead of sq rt of 5 + 1 or 3.2360679774997896964091736687313 I decided to use instead (sq rt of 2 / 4) x 1000 or 353.55339059327376220042218105242 and the results were mind blowingly staggering. First thing of note was that the square was now simply the square root of 2 (353.5534 x 4). The next logical step was to see what the enclosing circle circumference would be and it worked out to (perimeter of square or 1414.2135623730950488016887242097 x [sq rt of 32 x Pi) / 16] or 1414.2135623730950488016887242097 x 1.1107207345395915617539702475152 and this came to 1570.7963267948966192313216916398. Now the next step I did because we had assigned a value to Mercury in Gary's drawing of the sq rt of 3 so I decided to divide 1570.7963267948966192313216916398 by the square root of 3 and the answer I got will forever change the way I view the Great Pyramid and perhaps you as well for when I divided these two figures I got this astonishing number ... 1570.7963267948966192313216916398 / 1.7320508075688772935274463415059 = and really I have to warn you will simply not believe it .. it came out to 906.8996821171089252970391288211 ... Now at first I missed it but then I looked at it again and couldn't believe my eyes for there in front of me was the exact, and I mean exact base of The Great Pyramid in inches divided by 10 ... 906.8996821171089252970391288211 x 10 = 9068.996821171089252970391288211 ... I was giddy ... but there was much more to be revealed and that will wait for maybe tomorrow ... Image ... https://imagizer.imageshack.com/a/img923/7340/eajcH0.png Okay moving forward ... After this amazing result I contiue4nd to search for ratios that meant something and I ended up with this ... Perimeter = sq rt of 2 or 1.4142135623730950488016887242097 Outer Circle is 1.5707963267948966192313216916398 or sq rt of 2 (1.4142135623730950488016887242097) x [(sq rt of 32 x Pi) / 16 or ) 1.1107207345395915617539702475152 AND A SPECIAL NOTE HERE BECAUSE MOST WILL MISS IT 1.5707963267948966192313216916398 = 1/2 PI !!!!!! Inner circle = [(sq rt of 32 x Pi) / 16 or ) 1.1107207345395915617539702475152 Now while playing around trying to figure a simple way to help Gary get his figure I stumbled onto these relationships in this very special diagram. [b][u]I noticed that Inner Circle = Outer Circle / Perimeter !!!!!![/u][/b] As previously noted I noticed that Outer Circle / sq rt of 3 = 0.90689968211710892529703912882108 and finally [b][u]Perimeter x Inner Circle = Outer Circle !!!!!! [/u][/b] And then I tried yet another thing and I remembered (as I am sure you do) that I had assigned a value to the height of The Great Pyramid of 5773.50 inches. So were we to assume this was a diameter then we would get .... (sq rt of 3 / 3) x 10,000 x Pi and we get 18137.993642342178505940782576422 inches WHICH IS PRECISELY 2 X 9068.9968211710892529703912882108 AND BASE OF THE GREAT PYRAMID. Nice but we were still not quite done. I then decided to take the distance between 1.57079... and 1.11072... and getting a value of 0.460075591 and then I started to play around giving this the value of Gary's 299.792458 meters and then a Newtonian Light bulb went off in my head and I finally saw it clearly ... This is truly beautiful ... All that hard work to figure out the two circumferences in Gary's diagrams and they can be solved as simply as this below. It is truly awesome ... For Gary's circumference can be easily obtained with the simple formula ... [color=red][b][u]Large circle = (sq rt of 2 + 2) x c [/u][/b][/color] [color=blue][b][u]Small circle =[(sq rt of 2 + 2) x c] - c[/u][/b][/color] [color=green][b][u]Where c is the speed of light at exactly 299.792458[/u][/b][/color] Classic ! So it now appears to me that it really was never cubits at all that were intended. It was and has always been inches ... that were the unit of measurement in laying out The Great Pyramid (and the others as well which we will look at a bit later) For it is inconceivable to me that the measurements in inches of the base of The Great Pyramid can match our 906.8996 so exactly. So it was always this exact configuration they were trying to show ... Pi x 2 and we have talked about it for years but I feel I now have the proof as posted above but there is one more nail in the co-incidence coffin to hammer in. And here is the elegant conclusion to this particular saga ... I have determined that the outer circle represents (1/10th of) the base of The Great Pyramid to an exactness that is beyond reproach. Okay but where then is the inner circle to be found ? And in a stroke of either brilliance or insanity I decide to reciprocate the number sq rt 32 x Pi / 16 or 1.1107207345395915617539702475152 our inner circle measurement and this is what was revealed. But in order to see it one has to have seen Petrie notes on The Great Pyramid dimensions which I will just leave a link to so you can check for yourself, the inverse of our number is ... 0.90031631615710606955519919100674 ... and so what you might say but have a look at this ... https://imagizer.imageshack.com/a/img921/9294/JbbJeB.png So The Outer Perimeter of The Great Pyramid is the outer circle and the inner circle is defined by the case plane sides ... !!!!!!!! https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/6272/lqi1cf.png . [/quote]
Original Message
I haven’t seen it, came across with an interview at unchartedx YouTube channel and got interested right away.
Anyone that has seen “The Revelation of the Pyramids” would be interested in this follow up. They take it to the next level in Regards to the outstanding technical level shown by the remains of the ancient monuments in Egypt, South America and Asia.
I have yet to see the documentary, but with the comments in the UnchartedX interview and the free snippets available in the below link, I will certainly be watching it ASAP.
[
link to bam-eng.okast.tv (secure)
]
If you have time to watch only one snippet, watch the one of granite dug caves in India, this is breath taking.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>