Users Online Now:
2,770
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,969,124
Pageviews Today:
2,730,915
Threads Today:
665
Posts Today:
12,861
08:51 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Builder of the Ancient Mysteries documentary, some jaw dropping revelations from the maker of “The Revelation of the Pyramids”
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Ahatmose:MV80NzQzMDkxXzg2NDQ0MTMwX0JFMjhBRDk1] [quote:Ahatmose:MV80NzQzMDkxXzg2NDQxODc5XzlCOTcxQjg4] Hi again ... I hope I am not going too quickly. Part of my belief in The Pyramids representing the planets is simply the fact that the diagonal of The Great Pyramid in cubits (622.254 of them) when divided by 8 gives us [color=blue][b][u]77.781746[/u][/b][/color] . Now so what you might ask ... well as I was exploring numerous calculations I chanced to divide the semi major axis of Neptune which was according to Wiki ... well now this is interesting . It appears that Wiki does not want anyone to try to figure anything else as this is what it posts for Neptune: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/4123/WHojOl.png While I long ago had discovered that "Simple Wiki" yielded this result https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/9616/Pu0Aig.png So the semi major distance to Neptune is 4,503,443,661 km while to Mercury it is 57,909,050 so how many times would Mercury's distance divide into Neptune's distance and we get ... 4,503,443,661 / 57,909,050 = [color=green][b][u]77.767527891[/u][/b][/color] So what does this give us ? Well As most of you know I have spent decades searching . I would like to think that along the way I have accumulated a bit of wisdom and knowledge and that many of you have enjoyed the journey . One of the major things I found was an apparent correlation between The Pyramids of Giza and Our Solar System . For many years I took this as meaning that Giza was an astronomical book in stone and that The Ancient Builders built the pyramids to mimic the sky . As my knowledge increased it became apparent that many of the planetary ratios in The Heavens were duplicated at Giza and now with my discoveries at Meidum I am more convinced than ever that The Pyramids are messages in stone and to read them all you need is the language of Mathematics . This thread is going to catch you up on where my head is at and what "final" conclusion I have reached . To fully appreciate my thoughts a belief in an architect of The Universe is almost mandatory for if it is chaos you believe in, what's the point of it all and why build The Pyramids with all that clever mathematical ratios. Another search has always been, why are the planets where they are ? What apparent yet undiscovered (until now) plan was at work. So did "God" just roll the dice, Albert Einstein doesn't think so, or did he use The Kiss Principle when he designed and created The Universe and especially Our Solar System. Please remember I am creating a template at the moment of creation. The planets have shifted and reacted to each other and so where the planets are now may not be, and probably aren't, where they were "in the beginning" Some may claim special pleading but it is a fact. I am going to show that The Architect of Creation used the simplest of building blocks and it is because of this we find it at Giza but after the evidence I present you may actually become a believer Hi all . Some background links: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titius%E2%80%93Bode_law I am not inclined to rehash this so I will just post it as I wrote it and add a few things at the end. https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/tQKJa2.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/3dVghd.jpg ([b][u]PRESENT NOTE:[/u][/b] I have long asked myself and anyone else I could think of a fairly straight forward and simple question ... "Why are the planets where they are and why are they the size that they are ?" I have never ever got an answer. This then is my solution. It can't be sent to anyone because academia decided that they would no longer even look at any ideas of the planetary spacing. So I leave it up to you ) https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/evvLxq.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/lMo6dZ.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/922/gxbseX.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/fDT4gZ.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/XrMZA2.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/922/4xq26t.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/TlWFhP.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/UJaOkc.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/Ue6jf9.jpg The red numbers on this last page derived from the sq rt of 3 and the blue ones derived from the the sq rt of 2 [color=blue][b][u]and Ceres equaling them both and the boundary between the "Upper" and "Lower"[/u][/b][/color] sq rt of 3 = Lower or Below sq rt of 2 = Upper or Above [color=red][b][u][i]The Creator being clever used TWO templates . One for the Upper and another for The Lower and that's why no one has found it until now[/i][/u][/b][/color] And then I did some work on seeing if the diameter of The Sun had any bearing on the orbital distances and found that the difference between Pluto and Neptune is 1000 times the diameter of The Sun Here are my notes for that session. https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/WbhFm2.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/922/72zdru.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/0cZzip.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/FxpVep.jpg Not a stretch to round off . Neptune = 3236 Uranus = 2060 Saturn = 1030 Jupiter = 559 Ceres = 298 ( I have seen 297.46 somewhere else) ([b][u]PRESENT NOTE:[/u][/b] These number may hold some ultimate proofs which I need to study) And so I went in search of Pluto at Giza today ... (Jun 10, 2020 at 1:30pm) https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/z6vEKv.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/GMJeED.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/AYnHXx.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/fxutzj.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/Ylw1NB.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/922/F5QVLV.jpg This looks easy but it has taken me almost 20 years to finally figure out that Our Solar system is being controlled by [color=red][b][u]TWO DIFFERENT RATIOS ![/u][/b][/color] The above is based on the square root of 2 while the below is based on the square root of 3 with Ceres beautifully being the transition line and remarkably made up of the ratios of both the square root of 3 and the square root of 2. [color=blue]Mercury = square root of 2[/color] [color=red]Mars = square root of 3[/color] [color=indigo]Ceres = square root of 2 + square root of 3[/color] . [/quote] Hi this is to fill a bit of the gaps in the above post ...I downloaded and printed these off in case they were ever lost on The Internet Part I A Possible Solution to Our Solar System May 22, 2020 at 2:06pm https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/bEWjFa.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/6nUkFl.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/mqcGaS.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/yHUFce.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/2Aeyr9.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/066frh.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/bWvQ7T.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/ni2YNd.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/922/b3A7Yt.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/923/uTkSZa.jpg https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/320xq90/r/924/rTzA2d.jpg It was at this place in my studies I finally realized that [b][u][color=blue]the sq rt of 2[/color] along with [color=red]the sq rt of 3[/color] controlled the inanimate Universe while [color=green]Phi controlled the animate Universe [/color]. [/u][/b]Thus since the sq rt of both 2 and 3 were instrumental in the construction to be found in The Great Pyramid it by itself could never equal life however The Pyramid of Khafre with Phi being within it's very fabric as shown by it being The Second Pillar of Enoch was showing us life itself ([b][u]PRESENT NOTE:[/u][/b] I will explain this last line shortly) . [/quote]
Original Message
I haven’t seen it, came across with an interview at unchartedx YouTube channel and got interested right away.
Anyone that has seen “The Revelation of the Pyramids” would be interested in this follow up. They take it to the next level in Regards to the outstanding technical level shown by the remains of the ancient monuments in Egypt, South America and Asia.
I have yet to see the documentary, but with the comments in the UnchartedX interview and the free snippets available in the below link, I will certainly be watching it ASAP.
[
link to bam-eng.okast.tv (secure)
]
If you have time to watch only one snippet, watch the one of granite dug caves in India, this is breath taking.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>