Users Online Now:
2,071
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,033,324
Pageviews Today:
1,919,864
Threads Today:
923
Posts Today:
16,789
09:05 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
GCP Dot is DEEP BLUE! Massive coherence in effect NOW
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:eli the ineligible:MV80OTIzMjU1Xzg5OTg3OTQ3XzZGNjIxNzA=] [quote:Artificial Person:MV80OTIzMjU1Xzg5OTg3NTQwXzkxODg0REI3] [quote:AcidBass:MV80OTIzMjU1Xzg5OTg1NDg3Xzg5MjM1QTQ=] Also no one likes to talk about NSA backdoors into all computer chips that specifically target the random number generators. What it does is limit the amount of random numbers so the secure keys that get generated using the RNG function (md5, dsa, rsa, etc) can be broken within seconds instead of years. And to what extent does this mean they can force all chips to spit out just ones or just zeros for any period of time? I wouldn't doubt that they have that control as well by now. This GCP experiment is entirely based on AMD and Intel chip hardware designs and they have known flaws when it comes to RNG. Of course iOS and Windows will play along and allow the hardware exploits to be used in the software (they are closed source). But Linux is open source and TPTB got to that too. The creator of Linux forced a binary dependency (closed source, back like 15 years ago) from a govt agency and its for the RNG component. Nothing is random if you are using computer chips to measure the randomness. Shut it all down and start over. [/quote] Well that's: 1. Interesting 2. Unfortunate 3. Terrifying 4. New to me :verysad: [/quote] I'm sorry, but AcidBass gave himself away in the second sentence. GLP's gullibility is maddening. 1. MD5, DSA and RSA have nothing to do with PRNGs. 2. The GCP RNGs do not depend on backdoored CPUs/Intel. They use research grade generators based on quantum-level post-barrier voltage from electron tunneling in semiconductors - partly developed [b]in-house by themselves[/b] (Princeton PEAR). 3. Linux GNU C random() function is [i]not[/i] closed source, and is also [i]never[/i] relied on for security-critical or research work. In fact, it's well-known in the software field to avoid using any stdlib rand() for any serious work. I wrote the full response here, but I guess it wasn't as fun and sensational as his post :P https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4923255/pg2#89986073 [/quote]
Original Message
[
link to gcpdot.com (secure)
]
GCP Dot was deep RED.
Then it fell off a cliff.
IT'S NOW DEEP BLUE!
"Significantly small network variance. Suggestive of deeply shared, internally motivated group focus. The index is above 95%"
Extreme perimeter swing from RED to BLUE.
I've never seen this before.
SOMETHING BIG is about to happen within 24-48 hours.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>