Users Online Now:
1,732
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
454,072
Pageviews Today:
717,245
Threads Today:
284
Posts Today:
4,397
07:52 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
EARTH - Flat or Globe - discussion
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 80406901:MV80OTYzNTI2XzkwNzczMDQwXzU2NzE2M0Yz] [quote:Uwascallywabbit:MV80OTYzNTI2XzkwNzcyOTUxXzhGMDAzRUNF] its all already been typed, anyone can do as i did and simply re read it, you are "triggered" because im not buying into the open ended illogical argument that NASA lying has "implications" that support your theory. NASA lying could be to cover up that space is chock full of alien vessels.. NASA lying could be to cover up that the tech they use is too good to show to the general public. NASA lying could be to cover up concave earth, or "big-ball" earth. but the real problem with FE theories isnt even additional force input, as many FE believers think its a required part of a religious point of view, so the "extra" force inputs are the power of god and dont require explanation.. the realest problem with FE is academic ego. To hold FE as a "hidden reality" we have to believe that in the entire march of science, NO ONE in the last 2k plus years has reached for this low hanging fruit. sounds like a great thesis. If its so easy to prove write it up, launch a best seller, and tell the world how simple this "truth" really is. many of us are tired of these threads because they represent a perversion of conspiracy theory (chasing the truth instead of swallowing BS) AND they represent an abandonment of the march of science. in the dark ages, when the church was burning people alive for having their own notions, the idea of an independent, publicly reproducible well of knowledge that anyone could tap into via education was seen as a way OUT of the maze of power and disinformation that culture was trapped in. I for one, am not willing to toss that all away just because there still fools and shit heads among us. is our government always honest? NO does that invalidate the history of science? NO [/quote] You literally chose to double down, which is odd to me... Again - NASA IS LYING... that doesnt prove a flat Earth and i never said that. I said the flat Earth assertions are compelling and backed with evidence. Are you choosing to be dense? Or what... Seriously, this is my last reply to you... you seem to be on a program that ignores new input. How many times do I need to reiterate the same thing? NASA IS LYING!!!That's all I know for sure! Flat earth theorists make compelling arguments, not straw man bullshit like you are doing. NASA is lying... They are 100% lying. They are faking things. Doesnt mean the Earth is flat, but NASA IS LYING! Be dense or fake or whatever it is you are doing... [/quote]
Original Message
Besides the usual, "obviously its a sphere, idiot" rhetoric. Let's discuss the merits of both models, using actual evidence and counter evidence.
Im perfectly fine to believe either, as long as it is the truth.
First and foremost, all supposed pictures of the Earth of space, are admittedly (by those that created the images) photoshopped. Lets start here and see where we go.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>