Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,098 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,964,070
Pageviews Today: 2,900,433Threads Today: 794Posts Today: 16,455
11:36 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject Is the Bible the Literal Truth?
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message
Fundamentalists are usually long on opinion, and short on historical understanding. The ancient Hebrews had two traditions -- the Oral Tradition, and the Written Tradition. And when one considers the changes that languages undergo over the course of thousands of years, it becomes quite clear why both traditions are necessary.

Oral Tradition is very contingent upon sound -- obviously. And what few Fundamentalists realize is that languages undergo shifts in sound. Indeed, the English language had a rather dramatic shift during The Great Vowel Shift.

Written Tradition might seem the perfect solution, until one realizes how few people actually knew how to read or write, or how words actually change in meaning throughout time. How many of us consider an 'imp' to be a 'young shoot of a plant'?

The word 'Literal' comes from the Late Latin word lit(t)eralis, which means 'of or belonging to letters or writing'.

So is the Bible the Literal truth? Of course it is. Does that mean that it isn't mythological in nature? Of course it doesn't.

[link to para-physin.blogspot.com]
 Quoting: Source
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP