Users Online Now:
2,236
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,031,461
Pageviews Today:
1,720,696
Threads Today:
690
Posts Today:
12,396
05:01 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Sungaze_At_Dawn:MV81MDEyNjQyXzkxNzgwNzk1XzU2RTk4MTRE] You do what Robert Barnes, top attorney, said: 1. You get it in statement, policy statement writing. Because these guys are slippery eels, if they lay you off and say its because of the vaxx requirement but its actually not in writing as their policy, then in court they say you were incompetent and lie. 2. You find out what their insurance and health insurance coverage is, for the experimental vaxx? In case of injury and death. Often these companies don't even know the half of it, and rely in CNN. Many folded when those 2 demands were put in. 3. Then you demand they speak with their malpraciticing corporate lawyers to see why they're giving illegal advice, since Supreme Court just insured we can sue and appeal and own your company? Do they have Big Pharma as clients? Again many companies withdraw demands at this point. 4. Then you demand a religious exemption and point out that the SC ruling assured that the mandates are illegal but in the health care field, ROBUST RELIGOUS AND MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS WERE GRANTED IN THE JUDGEMENT. You tell them the legal definition of a religious exemption is a strong moral belief that cannot be questioned or refused, and cannot have any penalty such as unpaid leave attached or loss of job security as it is religious discrimination, and you give an example: Buck Versus Bell of the 1920's started the Eugenics era that saw many poor women sterilized and bodily integrity destroyed. Hitler praised the decision and based his eugenics on it. WW2 overturned that with robust laws and the Nuremburg Code, and informed VOLUNTARY consent, and you believe in execution of those who violate it very strongly and that is international law, so its an extremely strong moral belief. ONLY THE STUPIDEST COMPANIES CONTINUE, AND THEY'RE LAW SUITS. [/quote]
Original Message
The Biden administration’s nationwide Covid-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for large private employers is dead, following the 6-3 Supreme Court opinion Thursday.
But for many companies and their workers, a jab will still be a job requirement.
[
link to www.barrons.com (secure)
]
asswipes
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>