Users Online Now:
1,501
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
546,886
Pageviews Today:
713,019
Threads Today:
212
Posts Today:
2,892
06:18 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
SCOTUS sides with Biden admin, rules against Navy SEALs in vaccine mandate case
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 598428:MV81MDkzMDQ2XzkzMzY5NTM0XzFFQUFFREMy] They violated federal law when they pushed the experimental vax into service members. Can't get around that. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1107 (1) Whenever the Secretary of Defense requests or requires a member of the armed forces to receive an investigational new drug or a drug unapproved for its applied use, the Secretary shall provide the member with notice containing the information specified in subsection (d). (2) The Secretary shall also ensure that health care providers who administer an investigational new drug or a drug unapproved for its applied use, or who are likely to treat members who receive such a drug, receive the information required to be provided under paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (d). (b) Time of Notice.— The notice required to be provided to a member under subsection (a)(1) shall be provided before the investigational new drug or drug unapproved for its applied use is first administered to the member. (c) Form of Notice.— The notice required under subsection (a)(1) shall be provided in writing. (d) Content of Notice.—The notice required under subsection (a)(1) shall include the following: [b](1) Clear notice that the drug being administered is an investigational new drug or a drug unapproved for its applied use.[/b] (2) The reasons why the investigational new drug or drug unapproved for its applied use is being administered. (3) Information regarding the possible side effects of the investigational new drug or drug unapproved for its applied use, including any known side effects possible as a result of the interaction of such drug with other drugs or treatments being administered to the members receiving such drug. [/quote]
Original Message
The Supreme Court sided with the Biden administration when it ruled Friday that the Navy is allowed to consider vaccination status in deciding deployments or assignments for unvaccinated SEALS and other special operations personnel.
The majority of SCOTUS believes the US military has the authority to refuse the deployment of unvaccinated service members, while the dissenting opinion argues that the court decision will relegate soldiers in those cases to paper-pushing and desk duties.
Less than 50%
Sad. This mandate shit will never stop. They are just regrouping and will be back in a new way other than OSHA.
[
link to thepostmillennial.com (secure)
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>