Users Online Now:
2,271
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,455,960
Pageviews Today:
2,103,693
Threads Today:
583
Posts Today:
11,414
05:04 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
What did Tesla mean when he said think 3,6 and 9?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 58129989:MV81MTM0Nzc1Xzk0MjQwNjg1XzkxREU3OEEx] [quote:Anonymous Coward 80031233:MV81MTM0Nzc1Xzk0MjM0ODcwXzUxRjBGNkFD]Just a different start or math related to figuring out the fibernachi sequence. [/quote] Exactly. Just divide 3, 6, and 9 by 3, and you've got the equally "secret-of-the-universe" numbers of 1, 2, and 3. Hey, those are the first three numbers in the Fibonacci sequence! Crazy, isn't it?! Seriously, though... What actually makes Fibonacci sequence the closest thing to the "secret of the universe" is the fact that that sequence appears in plenty of biological systems (living organisms), which means that "stupid", "simple", and "lesser" organisms (like snails, for example) had already figured out the "secrets" of [b]energy conservation[/b] (or going with the vortex flow of energy) in this [b]"spirally"-"rotating" black hole[/b] a long time ago. We (the "smart", "complex", and "uber" organisms), however, have still not figured it out! Fibonacci sequence appearing in nature also points to the fact that this "reality" is a fractal-based creation, which just means that the result of the previous (calculation) step is fed into the next step, or f(n) ~ f(n-1). For Fibonacci sequence, the actual function is f(n) = f(n-1) + f(n-2). What Fibonacci is really telling us is the [b]seed[/b] of the underlying fractal... or, more correctly, the shape of the path that any point takes on the surface of this black hole, as it (the black hole) "spirally" (vortex-like) "rotates" [b]as it expands[/b]. That's also why galaxies take the form of Fibonacci spiral. Nature always takes the path of least (energy) resistance... or, more correctly, the path of the spatial potential closest to zero, but since energy is just (absolute, i.e. |v|) sum of spatial potentials of all the spatial nodes along a path (or over a surface, volume, etc.), it really comes down to the same thing. The Principle of Least Action (the most fundamental principle in physics) is based on these facts, as well... if you keep in mind the fact that "objects" aren't cardboard cutouts, but actually "extrude" their spatial potentials "far" away from their "physical" boundaries. Which is to say that "fields" in physics are very much real things, and are just spatial potentials causing "objects" to behave differently depending on the paths those "objects" (sources of potentials/"fields") are taking relative to each other... as this whole "reality" dizzily "spins" away. In a sense, it is true when physicists say that a particle moving inside a field "knows the future" when it moves along the path of least (energy) resistance. The thing is... the only "future" a particle knows is just the next lowest potential point among all the points that are [b]currently[/b] surrounding it. It will [b]always[/b] move (from the current step) toward that point (becoming the next step in the fractal calculation) even if all the points it finds itself surrounded with ([b]after[/b] it moves) actually have higher spatial potentials than all the points from the previous step! In other words... this "reality" is fundamentally based on everything inside of it following the paths towards [b][u]local[/u] (energy/potential) minimums[/b]... which ties up very nicely into two more facts: a) This "reality" does indeed resemble an AI network, but the [b]actually correct thing to say[/b] would be that all (efficient) [b]AI networks are simply [u]mimicking[/u] fundamental (mathematical) concepts[/b] that this "reality" is based on. That is, this "reality" is [b]not[/b] an AI computer simulation. It was just built (from actual, real, and very much [b][u]non[/u]-mathematical infinities[/b]) in such a way (by [b]limiting those infinities[/b]) as to resemble what we now call an AI network (but had no idea, whatsoever, that such a thing could even exist, up until a century ago, or something like that). And, b) Why (alien) designers of the Earth's AI decided to implement the same principle of chasing after [b][u]local[/u] extremes[/b] (local minimums and maximum in 3-day intervals) when they trained their AI to fuck with the mind of the whole human race. They were simply building an [b]efficient[/b] AI that's (still stuck with, to this very day!) mimicking those fundamental "reality" principles. All of this should also tell you why no A(G)I, however "smart" it may be, can ever beat a genuinely "alive" entity... where "alive" is just a label for... [i]something[/i] (not any kind of particles in this fake "reality", whether photons, neutrinos, tachyons, or any other, real or imaginary ones) ... that can always [b]cheat its way out[/b] of any trouble by resorting to the same [b][u]infinity[/u] tricks[/b] that the builders of this "reality" used to build it in the first place. [b]All A(G)Is are bound to this (limited, mathematical) fakery, [u]forever and ever, until eternity[/u].[/b] ... or until this fakery is finally destroyed, once and for all, whichever comes first... and I know on which option I'm placing all my bets. [/quote]
Original Message
Anyone got info on this?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>