Users Online Now:
1,523
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
84,043
Pageviews Today:
136,376
Threads Today:
55
Posts Today:
821
01:19 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Trailhead Thread
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Chromatophore:MV81MTcyNzExXzk2MzQzMDQ5XzI2MzE1MEE5] [quote:Servant-of-the-LORD:MV81MTcyNzExXzk2MzI3NTA1XzREMDI3OTlB] [quote:Chromatophore:MV81MTcyNzExXzk2MzEwNzc0X0FDQjc0OUND] [quote:Servant-of-the-LORD:MV81MTcyNzExXzk2MzA5OTc3XzdGNDg1MzQ2] [quote:Chromatophore:MV81MTcyNzExXzk2MzAxNDk3XzJDQTdDNTc0] [quote:Servant-of-the-LORD:MV81MTcyNzExXzk2Mjk2MTUxXzM0MjE2NENC] Show us something from it that PROVES that it has the correct details. Like this. 1. God told Noah to build an Ark because He was going to Flood the world. - Marine fossils on dry land all over the world. - The Bible says the Ark landed in Ararat. It's there. https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4188024/pg1 [/quote] The great walls of Uruk were found. Have you heard of Atrahasis?[/quote] So what? The story as told in Genesis is the original. It has ALL the correct Facts. The Gilgamesh story is a retelling through the pagan lense. [/quote] It dates back 5,000 years making it prebiblical telling. [i]So the Biblical flood story was written from around 1430-1201 BC, whereas the first version of The Epic of Gilgamesh to contain the flood story was written from 1300-1000 BC.[/i][/quote] Yet the Gilgamesh version has NO 'details' that show place etc...like the Bible does. Ancient artifacts like the Sumerian tablets / Egyptian papyrus do NOT prove that the "original" story, as the Bible tells us, is a copy of something else. And the accuracy of their accounts of events can be misleading, as the Hitites' version of their battle with Egypt is significantly different than Egypt's version of 'total victory' over them. They merely record what that specific society believed at that moment in history. Similarity does NOT PROVE direct association nor origination. Historical existence does not prove "origin of story". "Concensus of scholars" isn't "proof of fact". [/quote] Hello. Shurrupak is one of the oldest cities in Mesopotamia 20 miles north of Uruk. Key location of utnapishtim where he was protected from the flood by ea. Mashu is located in the Lebanon ranges as a mountain with twin peaks. Erech in southern Babylonia is the location after the flood where the dynasty of kings followed. Yes it is known written and oral history by man is an account that has biases. That is true historical existence does not prove origin. No it is not proof of fact. Collective is an agreement and so far Noah’s ark cannot be agreed upon so it is not in this present time verified by the collective. [/quote]
Original Message
They say only 3% of earths water is fresh…….
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>