Users Online Now:
1,653
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
35,484
Pageviews Today:
71,460
Threads Today:
35
Posts Today:
592
01:00 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Sen. Dianne Feinstein Introduces Bill to Ban 205 ‘Assault Weapons’ by name” and prohibit transfer of “high capacity” mag
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Miller_The_Bastard_Cat:MV81MzQzODYxXzk4NjAyODMwXzFBRkMzMDQ=] [quote:Anonymous Coward 84959966:MV81MzQzODYxXzk4NjAyMzgzXzc3MDdBNDk0] Yeah, because that worked so well on Bill Clinton, didn't it? Just keep doing the same dumb shit and get the same dumb results [/quote] It's different now, because we have WAY more brainwashed, anti-gun Progressives in this country now, than in the 1990's. I can remember the 1994 assault rifle ban, and how it effected gun stores, and certain gun manufacturing. I remember local news story's on gun stores having to lay off and even close due to the ban... and community's did rise up, and protest the ban back then. I don't see the same thing happening now, because people have forgotten that ALL GOVERNMENTS EVENTUALLY FAIL, and when that happens, Governments turn on their own people, and Genocide them. Guns are for protecting us, from a tyrannical Government. They will eventually take them away, because of all the brainwashing, it's just a matter of time. The real question is, will people finally take a stand, or will we just curl up into a ball, and let the Government take everything from us? [/quote]
Original Message
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced legislation Monday to ban “205 military-style assault weapons
by name” and prohibit transfer of “high capacity” magazines.
Feinstein cited the January 21, 2023, Monterey Park shooting as the impetus for the reintroduction of the “assault weapons” ban.
She said, “We were tragically reminded this weekend of the deadly nature of assault weapons when a shooter used one to kill 11 people and injure 9 more at a Lunar New Year celebration in California.”
However, Feinstein’s proposed ban would not have prevented the suspected gunman from possessing the gun used in the attack.
In addition to banning the “sale, manufacture, transfer and importation” of 205 specific firearms, Feinstein’s bill requires “a background check on any future sale, trade or gifting of an assault weapon covered by the bill.” (This would apply to guns grandfathered in, if the bill were to become law.)
[
link to www.breitbart.com (secure)
]
Link to the list: [
link to www.feinstein.senate.gov (secure)
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>