Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,479 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 354,822
Pageviews Today: 581,312Threads Today: 178Posts Today: 3,343
07:14 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

British Medical Records Go Online without patient consent. Are we next? Pelosis says must pass Health Care to know what's in it. HUH?

 
DoUCDem2?
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 666923
United States
03/09/2010 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
British Medical Records Go Online without patient consent. Are we next? Pelosis says must pass Health Care to know what's in it. HUH?
[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

Patients' medical records go online without consent
Patients’ confidential medical records are being placed on a controversial NHS database without their knowledge, doctors’ leaders have warned.


By Kate Devlin, Medical Correspondent
Published: 10:20PM GMT 09 Mar 2010

Those who do not wish to have their details on the £11 billion computer system are supposed to be able to opt out by informing health authorities.

But doctors have accused the Government of rushing the project through, meaning that patients have had their details uploaded to the database before they have had a chance to object.


Related Articles
NHS plans to use more generic drugs to save more than £20 million a year'
Hospital car parking charges 'to be abolished for some within three years'
Almost 50,000 patients a year 'die in hospital while suffering from malnutrition'
Doctors fight plans to hand medical records to researchers and private companies
Private companies could get access to millions of NHS medical records
Doctors will have to seek patient consent to read their electronic medical recordsThe scheme, one of the largest of its kind in the world, will eventually hold the private records of more than 50 million patients.

But it has been dogged by accusations that the private information held on it will not be safe from hackers.

The British Medical Association claims that records have been placed on the system without patients’ knowledge or consent.

It follows allegations that the Government wanted to complete the project before the Conservatives had a chance to cancel it.

In a letter to ministers published today, the BMA urges the Government to suspend the scheme.

Hamish Meldrum, its chairman, writes: "The breakneck speed with which this programme is being implemented is of huge concern.

"Patients’ right to opt out is crucial, and it is extremely alarming that records are apparently being created without them being aware of it.

"If the process continues to be rushed, not only will the rights of patients be damaged, but the limited confidence of the public and the medical profession in NHS IT will be further eroded."

At present 1.29 million people have had their details placed on the system. A further 8.9 million records are due to be added by June. By the end of next year, the NHS hopes to have more than 50 million uploaded.

The "summary" records contain basic medical information including illnesses, vaccination history, and could include medication patients have been given. Ages and addresses are also included.

Patients are supposed to be notified by letter at least 12 weeks before their details go live on the system and given the chance to opt out.

The BMA says that letters have gone to the wrong addresses and that many patients have been unsure what they mean.

Doctors point out that there has been no national advertising programme to explain the scheme, as has been the case with other government initiatives.

The BMA also criticises the fact that the information packs do not include the form which allows patients to opt out. It can only be obtained via the internet or by calling a helpline.

Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said: "The Health Service should not put in place bureaucratic obstacles to patient choice because they are worried about what patients might choose to do."

Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat health spokesman, said: "The Government needs to end its obsession with massive central databases.

"The NHS IT scheme has been a disastrous waste of money and the national programme should be abandoned."

A spokesman for the Department of Health said that ministers "absolutely support" the right of patients to opt out of the scheme, adding that various options were provided to make this straightforward.

Last Edited by DoUCDem2? on 03/09/2010 08:18 PM
It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires in people's minds.
Samuel Adams
DoUCDem2?  (OP)

User ID: 666923
United States
03/09/2010 08:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: British Medical Records Go Online without patient consent. Are we next? Pelosis says must pass Health Care to know what's in it. HUH?

It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires in people's minds.
Samuel Adams
DoUCDem2?  (OP)

User ID: 666923
United States
03/09/2010 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: British Medical Records Go Online without patient consent. Are we next? Pelosis says must pass Health Care to know what's in it. HUH?
Ever thought about your medical records being stolen or mixed up? You could get the wrong kind of care, might even be fatal with the wrong drugs, etc.


It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires in people's minds.
Samuel Adams





GLP