"On the contrary, it has been reported that the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in operation."
Yes. By me. Several times on this forum.
United Airlines employee Mr Friedman kept a log of all the flights he flew on during 2003, including details about their crews and the tail number (N-number) of the planes. He recorded that on April 10, 2003, he flew on a United Airline Boeing 757 with tail/N-number N591UA. This is the tail number of Flight UA 93, which was supposed to have crashed in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001. See his log at:
[
link to friedmanfamily.org]
and the entry of this plane in the FAA registry with the same N-number at:
[
link to 162.58.35.241]
As independent confirmation that the tail number of Flight UA 93 is 591UA, see the beginning of the second paragraph under the header "Background" at:
[
link to en.wikipedia.org]
Look in Friedmanīs log under the date column 04/10/03 for the row named "Tail" (the tail number). The tail number he gives for the flight he was on that day is N591UA.
Moreover, he correctly lists the type of plane as a Boeing 757. Given that, according to his log, he flew on nine different types of planes between 01/02/03 and 04/10/03, the chance of him flying on a Boeing 757 on April 10 is about 10%.
Either:
1. his log is a subtle joke to fool 9/11 conspiracy investigators for whom he has no time. If that is the case subtle is the word, for not even many such investigators would recognise the tail number of Flight 93 if they read it, whilst the log is a single, obscure webpage and not part of a personal website, so he is not trying very hard to advertise his misinformation;
2. Friedman accidently made a false entry that coincided with BOTH the type of plane that was supposed to have crashed on 9/11 AND with its 3-figure tail number (what are the chances of that?!);
3. Flight 93 did not crash into a field in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001 and United Airlines was still using this plane in April, 2003.
You decide.
