Anonymous Coward User ID: 530536 United States 05/30/2010 01:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MAYBE THE REAL GUSHER SIMMONS IS TALKING ABOUT IS THE RELIEF WELL There is a thread about Simmons advocating nuking a site 5 or 6 miles from the wellhead, where the major oil surge is taking place. Simmons has been talking about this new site for a few days now. The announcer on the other GLP thread about Simmons says something like "looks like BP has even bigger problems (than the leaking riser) several miles away."
Okay, if something is leaking several miles away, and they have stated 5 or 6 miles away in the past, how is that BP's problem?
What are they saying exactly?
According to Simmons there is a minor leak at the wellhead/riser and there is a major leak 5 or 6 miles away. How does the major leak line up with the blowout leak at the wellhead and why does the other leak have anything to do with BP?
How about this for a guess: they caused another blowout while drilling one of the relief wells. THAT would make it BP'S problem, wouldn't it?
They would be drilling the relief wells about 5 or 6 miles away from the first well.
The relief well blewout and now there are two gushers 6 miles apart. That's what they aren't telling us. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 530536 United States 05/30/2010 01:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: MAYBE THE REAL GUSHER SIMMONS IS TALKING ABOUT IS THE RELIEF WELL |