Ascension Mathematics....and a possible key for Aether.

Dots?

I printed out some of your posts and bookmarked others to go back and read later. Just not today. You see, I stayed up until 2:00 a.m. last night watching this set of videos, which begins with a theory involving "dots":

Thread: NASSIM HARAMEIN - CROSSING EVENT HORIZON

I have not seen the videos but will watch later...this thread has been bookmarked. Thankyou for the honor of printing my posts it is nice to be taken seriously.

failure. you fail to grasp your own relation to a series and how the propagation of a next event or matrix concluded as the following number is based on perspective of the following known quantity; thus negating the latter as any known quantity based on observances from a prior conception of a "number".

greater still the more "three" becomes; the less it is in relation to "two" and thus "two" gains more weight: fact and pertaining to numerology.so how do you quantify this truth? mass. yet, the more mass "two" gains because of the propagation of "three" the more weight "three" also gains in direct irrational equilibrium.

there is no math for the natural occurrence of your juxtaposition within the many positions you can assume in a varied lattice.

This is a prime example of idiocy....
lol ....did you even read the thread?

OK define your terms with numbers as I did on my thread. give me a mathematical formula for what your saying...tell me step by step why I am ''wrong''.

ok I have waited a defacto amount of time for a NUMERICAL reply seeing none forthcoming ...I will move on.


....If anyone is interested in Aether Math let me know. I will check in on this thread from time to time.

VERY SIMPLE, YOU ARE WRONG BECAUSE YOU ARE INSANE.

I'm sorry Dante. Zeno and the mathematics involved are above the head of some of our fellow GLPers.

I would have to devote some time to look at what you have there. I will. I gave it a precursory glance for now.

I noticed the reference to the golden ratio in your sig and see that you have an interest in sacred geometry. You may be familiar with Euclid I take it?

I think you should check out Jon Depew's work. He is a mason but has some intriguing theories. He site is hard to navigate but it's worth it.

Its quite alright Joe neubarth is writing ''im insane'' on all of my threads....I have written many many threads on Math. I enjoy mathematics very much...its a hobby. I am partial to sacred geometry golden mean ratio etc. I will check out that site thanks!

Much of his work are what appear to be simple geometric designs and graphs but there are some nuggets if you can find them.

although I have neither the time at the moment nor the mathematical skills in general to serve you with a reply to further deepen your quest, I would like to state that it is a continuous delight to read your posts. They inspire me to explore the world of mathematics further (and that's a real achievement, believe me!).
On top of that I think you are one of the most polite, sincere and friendly users on this website. Keep it up OP, and thanks for sharing your knowledge!

These are called tensors. [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Yes, you can transform density using the Jacobi method. [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Jacobian is the rth power. This isn't a new discovery. But maybe I'm missing something.

I'm not sure what the dots are about?

Do your equations create an image or artwork (using dots) that will stimulate something in the psyche?

I'm just a dumb female what do I know?

thankyou very much!! It is nice to hear that I have helped some people here.

you my dear are far from dumb....and do not let anyone tell you otherwise. Applying jacobian to a Aether unit is what is new...Ie what gives rise to the 1/2 spin angular momentum of the electron neutron etc?...Aether physics model takes this into consideration...I was simply trying to provide a relevant math for their said postulate.

Edmund,
Genius works in mysterious ways...
It appears many on Earth are converging on 'something' new.
I myself am writing a book, on this subject, and trying to provide a new Theory of Everything that integrates science with religion. A non neutered religion. I have the philosophical arguments, but have been researching the math to describe the angular momentum of the Aether as I have a new spiritual/physical definition of The Energy model.
If you would like to correspond and/or collaborate, I would be most interested to see your work. I'm no math wiz, but I'm no dummy either.

I am humbled by your request. Thankyou for thinking so highly of me but math is a hobby of mine...I am just an EMT. For the purposes of a book you should see about finding a Phd. I have posted several mathematical threads on here feel free to use any of them. Science and religion need not be mutually exclusive. APM does a fine job of integrating the trouble comes in the math....Which many many people are working on. There is a real genius user on here named Aether and another named Sickscent try them ...they may know where to point you to. Good luck!

What kind of atom are you living on?

Fibonacci sequence 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,377


1/1 =1
2/1 = 2
3/2 =1.5
5/3 =1.667
8/5 =1.60
13/8 = 1.625
21/13 = 1.6153
34/55 = 1.6176
89/55 = 1.6181
144/89 = 1.6179
233/144 = 1.6180


Golden Ratio is 1.61803398875

Very very good!! I wrote a whole thread on fibonacci and indeed it has much to do with the golden ratio! ....APM uses the golden ratio and fibonacci quite a bit....

An article you may find interesting.

[link to www.onereed.com]

thakyou I will review it later...it has been bookmarked.

Edmond,
NO, the whole point of the book, is that the phd's of the world are blinded by their own light...so to speak. That science has been set back 1000's of years by the 'credentialing' process, the pharisees of this world.
You have found a math, that describes the Aetheric and the angular momentum? You are the one I've been pointed to. This has nothing to do with this book being accepted by the Authorities, this book is to throw it in their face.

The Catholics destroyed the Gnostics, and kept science on a leash for 100's of years, if I were to tell you, that the secret of the Universe(s), lies in the secrets of the Ancients, and that the secret is metaphysical and how it causes the physical, would you be interested in simply providing some math to describe a computer model that can 'create' a Universe? I'll do the programming if you can help with the math, and you get full credit for the algorithm.

I'm trying to find a math, that describes a tangential vector on a tensor string field of e=mc2 with angular potential. I can 'see' it in my head, but cannot describe it except in the gross mathematics of angular momentum. The result of this, would be all things are spin and Chao's.

Do you understand? This is only a hobby as well. It is right and appropriate, that some hobbyists, break the log jam of Quantum Mechanics. I also, have an integrated theory of gravity and time, that falls right into this as a side benefit.

Who have been the greatest contributors to science? I contend, hobbyists. Everything else is refinement, by credentialed people, maintaining their own status quo's. They build on the shoulders of giants, but the giants, in their day, were always, the Nuts, Crazies, and Heretics.

Elegance is where we need to go, correct?

BTW, Edmond,
The greatest part of this theory of everything, is that, in order to work, it must mathematically prove that their must be a causal force...a Creator. And part is to provide experiment that can prove the existence of the Soul.

If all things are energy, as Einstein said, which was proven beyond shadow of a doubt when the first atom bomb was exploded, then the Soul must be energy, and thus, be measurable.

figurate number expansion useing cube triangular etc.. formation from a beginning vector (0,0,0) expanding approaching infinity. 1/2 spin=electron neutron protons etc... as to the chaos....I believe there is a definite order as to the simlitude of Phi present in all of nature...the 1/2 spin gives rise to a Phi proportion.
hence my signature..

As to the alogorithim/proof I am working on one. It is not ready yet.

Interesting stuff.

The square root of 5

2.2360679775