Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,571 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 170,284
Pageviews Today: 283,809Threads Today: 91Posts Today: 1,667
03:42 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

COREXIT NOT TOXIC

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 905122
United States
08/13/2010 05:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
COREXIT NOT TOXIC
Isn't this the same EPA that doesn't say shit when they are chemtrailing us? Ok, I feel better that they're patting me on the head and saying all is well. No better than the FDA turning their head to GMO, aspartame and nano in our food. All is well slaves now take your arsenic and go night night.


Monday, August 02, 2010
EPA Says Corexit 9500A Less Toxic Than Originally Thought
EPA Releases Second Phase of Toxicity Testing Data for Eight Oil Dispersants

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today released peer reviewed results from the second phase of its independent toxicity testing on mixtures of eight oil dispersants with Louisiana Sweet Crude Oil. EPA has found that a new round of independent testing showed that Corexit 9500A was similar to the toxicity of seven other dispersants pre-approved for combating oil spills. Previously, the EPA had said Corexit 9500A was among the most toxic chemicals and had ordered BP PLC to find a less toxic alternative. BP insisted that Corexit 9500A was the best option. The dispersant is made by Nalco Holding Company.

EPA also concluded that Corexit 9500A and most other oil-dispersant mixtures were also less toxic to the fish than oil alone, suggesting the use of dispersants was "a wise decision." The EPA authorized the use of dispersants in order to keep oil from reaching the shores, mindful of the risk of unknown damage to fish and other aquatic life. The agency and the U.S. Coast Guard later ordered BP to cut back its use of dispersants.

The Center believes that dispersants are toxic and their use added to the pollution produced by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Yet, in the final analysis, we have to agree with the EPA when it concluded:

"...while it might not have agreed with every [Coast Guard] waiver, it believed that dispersant use "has been an essential tool in mitigating this spill's impact."
The standard acute toxicity tests were conducted on juvenile shrimp and small fish that are found in the gulf and are commonly used in toxicity testing. The tests were conducted on mixtures of Louisiana Sweet Crude Oil and eight different dispersant products found on the National Contingency Plan Product Schedule – Dispersit SPC 1000, Nokomis 3-F4, Nokomis 3-AA, ZI-400, SAFRON Gold, Sea Brat #4, Corexit 9500 A and JD 2000.

The same eight dispersants were used during EPA’s first round of independent toxicity testing. All eight dispersants were found to be less toxic than the dispersant-oil mixture to both test species. Louisiana Sweet Crude Oil was more toxic to mysid shrimp than the eight dispersants when tested alone. Oil alone had similar toxicity to mysid shrimp as the dispersant-oil mixtures, with exception of the mixture of Nokomis 3-AA and oil, which was found to be more toxic than oil. While there has been virtually no dispersant use since the well was capped on July 15 – only 200 gallons total applied on July 19 – EPA’s environmental monitoring continues.

EPA’s position has been that BP should use as little dispersant as necessary and, on May 23, Administrator Jackson and then-federal on-scene coordinator Rear Admiral Mary Landry directed BP to reduce dispersant usage by 75 percent from peak usage. EPA and the Coast Guard formalized that order in a directive to BP on May 26. Before directing BP to ramp down dispersant use, EPA directed BP to analyze potential alternative dispersants for toxicity and effectiveness. BP reported to EPA that they were unable to find a dispersant that is less toxic than Corexit 9500, the product then in use. Following that, EPA began its own scientific testing of eight dispersant products. EPA released the first round of data – on the dispersant products alone – on June 30. Today’s results represent the second and final stage of the independent acute toxicity tests. View the toxicity test results. (EPA, WSJ, 8/2/1020)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1059478
United States
08/13/2010 05:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
Let's see Obama and his family swim in it when they visit the Gulf.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 905122
United States
08/13/2010 05:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
Screw them on deleting all negative links that EPA had on Corexit. I captured these labels on a video and posted long before they began putting this BS out.

Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 905122
United States
08/13/2010 05:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
Wrong vid and wrong atrocity


Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 905122
United States
08/13/2010 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
[link to justpiper.com]

(Detailed Report~JP) Toxicologist: Oil/Corexit mix caused heart,organ damage,rectal bleeding
August 2nd, 2010 Posted in NEED TO KNOW . YOU MAKE ME SICK... . ~JP Originals & Exposes By justpiper Write comment
*A Char find*

By Stephen C. Webster Raw Story


Shrimpers who were exposed to a mixture of oil and Corexit dispersant in the Gulf of Mexico suffered severe symptoms such as muscle spasms, heart palpitations, headaches that last for weeks and bleeding from the rectum, according to a marine toxicologist who issued the warning Friday on a cable news network.

Dr. Susan Shaw, founder and director of the Marine Environmental Research Institute, said during a CNN broadcast that after personally diving the oil spill in late May, a “very fiery sore throat” plagued her from inhaling fumes coming off the water. Because she was covered from head to toe in a protective suit, Dr. Shaw was spared direct exposure.

Shrimpers who had bare-skin contact with the mixture of oil and Corexit, she said, were not so lucky.

During her segment with anchor Rick Sanchez, Dr. Shaw specified that stories shrimpers had told her were from when BP was deploying “the more toxic” Corexit 9527. BP has allegedly switched to Corexit 9500, which Dr. Shaw has also taken to task in a widely-publicized essay.

The company responsible for producing the various Corexit formulas is Nalco, Co., which was created by former members of the boards of directors at BP and Exxon. Their product is essentially by the oil industry, for the oil industry. That’s why, even in the face of an alternative like Dispersit which is half as toxic as Corexit, Nalco’s product is still in much greater supply.

Gulf toxicologist: Shrimpers exposed to Corexit “bleeding from the rectum”

CNN, July 9. 2010: Rush Transcript Excerpt Susan Shaw, Marine Toxicologist: If I can tell you what happens — because i was in the oil — to people… Shrimpers throwing their nets into water… [then] water from the nets splashed on his skin. … [He experienced a] headache that lasted 3 weeks… heart palpitations… muscle spasms… bleeding from the rectum… And that’s what that Corexit does, it ruptures red blood cells, causes internal bleeding, and liver and kidney damage. … This stuff is so toxic combined… not the oil or dispersants alone. … Very, very toxic and goes right through skin.

* Keep this in mind…

Peter 3 weeks ago

She’s wrong about the 9500 vs 9527. 9500 is actually more toxic than 9527. It was made to use in cold Alaskan waters & 9527 was meant for warm waters. 9500 is more toxic and less effective than 9527.

Dispersants such as COREXIT 9527 – Have Adverse Effects on Biological Processes
>esper

User ID: 1067223
United States
08/13/2010 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
COREXIT HAS "TOXIC" WRITTEN ALL OVER IT
"I am searching for the bones of your father but cannot distinguish them from those of a slave." Diogenes

"Some have little power to do good, and have likewise little strength to resist evil" (Samuel Johnson).



"The basic difference between an ordinary man and a warrior is that a warrior takes everything as a challenge, while an ordinary man takes everything as a blessing or as a curse."--Don Juan
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 905122
United States
08/13/2010 05:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
[link to pagingdrgupta.blogs.cnn.com]


09:05 AM ET
Share
Comments (32 comments)
Permalink

How will the oil spill affect my health?
As a feature of CNNhealth.com, our team of expert doctors will answer readers' questions. Here are several questions related to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico for Dr. Gupta.

From Jacque, Mobile, Alabama

"What health problems could the dispersant Corexit cause? I still don't understand why BP continues to use it."

Answer:

Jacque, that's an interesting question. Hundreds of thousands of gallons of Corexit dispersants have been sprayed into the oil slick since April. It's banned in many countries including Great Britain. But it's approved by the EPA here in the U.S., despite the fact that it has been rated less effective and more toxic than many other EPA-approved dispersants. A lot of people know that now.

I talked to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson about that very thing and pointed out there's a list of 18 dispersants, and out of that list, this is one of the most toxic. It's unclear why BP continues to use it. Jackson said the EPA has encouraged BP to stop using this particular substance.

I found the product information sheet on the website of the manufacturer of this dispersant. It's says it's classified as a hazardous substance, and it says you have to use adequate ventilation and certainly use some sort of mask or breathing apparatus when applying it.

That certainly raises concerns when we see pictures of people working on the oil slick without any breathing protection.
Macchendra

User ID: 1067330
United States
08/13/2010 05:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
COREXIT ISN'T TOXIC

COREXIT IS TOXIC-ER (anagram, lol)
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 905122
United States
08/13/2010 05:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
[link to www.epa.gov]

COREXIT® EC9500A

Quickfinder
Border Programs
CAMEO
EPCRA
Facility Response Plan
Freshwater Spills Symposia
Hurricanes
LEPCs
List of Lists
Local Governments Reimbursement
National Response System
NCP Product Schedule
Natural Disasters
Regional Contacts
Risk Management Plan
RMP*eSubmit
SERCs
SPCC Rule
Tier2 Submit
More...
TECHNICAL PRODUCT BULLETIN #D-4
USEPA, OIL PROGRAM CENTER
ORIGINAL LISTING DATE: APRIL 13, 1994
REVISED LISTING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1995
"COREXIT® EC9500A"
(formerly COREXIT 9500)

I. NAME, BRAND, OR TRADEMARK
COREXIT® EC9500A
Type of Product: Dispersant

II. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF MANUFACTURER/CONTACT
Nalco Energy Services, L.P.
7705 Highway 90-A
Sugar Land, TX 77487-0087
Product Management:
Office: (281) 263-7336
Mobile: (281) 202-8126
E-mail: [email protected]
Web Site: [link to www.nalco.com]
(Ms. Kathryn Preston)

III. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PRIMARY DISTRIBUTORS
Nalco Energy Services, L.P.
7705 Highway 90-A
Sugar Land, TX 77487-0087
Product Management:
Office: (281) 263-7336
Mobile: (281) 202-8126
E-mail: [email protected]
Web Site: [link to www.nalco.com]
(Ms. Kathryn Preston)

IV. SPECIAL HANDLING AND WORKER PRECAUTIONS FOR STORAGE AND FIELD APPLICATION
1. Flammability:
IMO: Non-flammable; DOT: Non-hazardous.
2. Ventilation:
Use with ventilation equal to unobstructed outdoors in moderate breeze.
3. Skin and eye contact; protective clothing; treatment in case of contact:
Avoid eye contact. In case of eye contact, immediately flush eyes with large amounts of water for at least 15 minutes. Get prompt medical attention. Avoid contact with skin and clothing. In case of skin contact, immediately flush with large amounts of water, and soap if available. Remove contaminated clothing, including shoes, after flushing has begun. If irritation persists, seek medical attention. For open systems where contact is likely, wear long sleeve shirt, chemical resistant gloves, and chemical protective goggles.

4.a. Maximum storage temperature: 170ºF
4.b. Minimum storage temperature: -30ºF
4.c. Optimum storage temperature range: 40ºF to 100ºF
4.d. Temperatures of phase separations and chemical changes: None

V. SHELF LIFE
The shelf life of unopened drums of COREXIT® EC9500A is unlimited. Containers should always be capped when not in use to prevent contamination and evaporation of solvents.

VI. RECOMMENDED APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1. Application Method:
COREXIT® EC9500A contains the same surfactants present in COREXIT® EC9500A and a new improved oleophilic solvent delivery system.
Aerial Spraying - Aircraft provide the most rapid method of applying dispersants to an oil spill and a variety of aircraft can be used for spraying. For aerial spraying, COREXIT® EC9500A is applied undiluted. Typical application altitudes of 30 to 50 feet have been used, although higher altitudes may be effective under certain conditions. Actual effective altitudes will depend on the application equipment, weather and aircraft. Careful selection of spray nozzles is critical to achieve desired dose levels, since droplet size must be controlled. Many nozzles used for agricultural spraying are of low capacity and produce too fine a spray. A quarter-inch open pipe may be all that is necessary if the aircraft travels at 120 mph (104 knots) or more, since the air shear at these speeds will be sufficient to break the dispersant into the proper sized droplets.
Boat Spraying - COREXIT® EC9500A may also be applied by workboats equipped with spray booms mounted ahead of the bow wake or as far forward as possible. The preferred and most effective method of application from a workboat is to use a low-volume, low-pressure pump so the chemical can be applied undiluted. Spray equipment designed to provide a five to ten percent diluted dispersant solution to the spray booms can also be used. COREXIT® EC9500A 9500 should be applied as droplets, not fogged or atomized. Natural wave or boat wake action usually provides adequate mixing energy to disperse the oil. Recent tests have indicated that a fire monitor modified with a screen cap for droplet size control may also be useful for applying COREXIT® EC9500A. Due to the increased volume output and the greater reach of the fire monitor, significantly more area can be covered in a shorter period of time.
System Calibration - Spray systems should be calibrated at temperatures anticipated to insure successful application and dosage control. Application at sub-freezing temperatures may require larger nozzle, supply lines and orifices due to higher product viscosity.
2. Concentration/Application Rate:
A treatment rate of about 2 to 10 U.S. gallons per acre, or a dispersant to oil ratio of 1:50 to 1:10 is recommended. This rate varies depending on the type of oil, degree of weathering, temperature, and thickness of the slick.
3. Conditions for Use:
As with all dispersants, timely application ensures the highest degree of success. Early treatment with COREXIT® EC9500A, even at reduced treat rates, can also counter the "mousse" forming tendencies of the spilled oil. COREXIT® EC9500A is useful on oil spills in salt water.

VII. TOXICITY AND EFFECTIVENESS
a. Toxicity
Material Tested Species LC50 (ppm)
COREXIT® EC9500A Menidia beryllina
Mysidopsis bahia 25.20 96-hr
32.23 48-hr

No. 2 Fuel Oil Menidia beryllina
Mysidopsis bahia 10.72 96-hr
16.12 48-hr

COREXIT® EC9500A & No. 2 Fuel Oil (1:10) Menidia beryllina
Mysidopsis bahia 2.61 96-hr
3.40 48-hr

Reference Toxicant (SDS) Menidia beryllina
Mysidopsis bahia 7.07 96-hr
9.82 48-hr

NOTE: This toxicity data was derived using the concentrated product. See Section VI of this bulletin for information regarding the manufacturer's recommendations for concentrations and application rates for field use.

b. Effectiveness:
SWIRLING FLASK DISPERSANT EFFECTIVENESS TEST WITH SOUTH LOUISIANA (S/L) AND PRUDHOE BAY (P/B) CRUDE OILS
Oil Effectiveness (%)
Prudhoe Bay Crude 45.3%
South Louisiana Crude 54.7%
Average of Prudhoe Bay and South Louisiana Crudes 50.0 %

VIII. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
1. Flash Point: 181.4ºF [ THIS IS THE HIDDEN GOODY WHEN IT MIXES IN WITH THAT HOT OIL AND METHANE
2. Pour Point: Less than -71ºF
3. Viscosity: 22.5 cst at 104ºF
4. Specific Gravity: 0.949 at 60ºF
5. pH: 6.2
6. Chemical Name and Percentage by Weight of the Total Formulation: CONFIDENTIAL
7. Surface Active Agents: CONFIDENTIAL
8. Solvents: CONFIDENTIAL
9. Additives: None
10. Solubility: Miscible

IX. ANALYSIS FOR HEAVY METALS, CYANIDE, AND CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
Compound Concentration (ppm)
Arsenic 0.16
Cadmium N/D
Chromium 0.03
Copper 0.10
Lead N/D
Mercury N/D
Nickel N/D
Zinc N/D
Cyanide N/D
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons N/D

N/D = Not detected
12000Eyes

User ID: 949423
United States
08/13/2010 05:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COREXIT NOT TOXIC
Hmmmm....

Something killed the barnacles on the South shore of Mobile Bay:

August 2009
aug09brncls

June 2010
jun10brncls

tissue
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Eschewing Obfuscation





GLP