Hi Smilin' Irish Eyes, by the way - love your Lord Chesterfield quote.

Is it not funny - discussing Nothing can entail so many words? The simplest description of my thoughts on Nothing might be to expand on the studio description in the above video.
If one were able to vacate everything out of a given volume (by some process of force that we won't go into right here) what would it result in? Not a space with nothing in it, but a volume with no space in it.
The phenomenon is only observable due to the space surrounding the volume. The 'inside' can only be described by the exterior behavior of space/time/matter. (Let's just call the exterior 'space'). The non-space interior could be termed a reverse singularity, in that it is akin to a black hole in that space is gravitationally attracted to it, but its existence consists of the opposite of a black hole - it is nothing rather than a concentration of matter.
Providing the non-space boundary is maintained, exterior space will gravitationally implode upon it, so we might assume that the boundary gets very, very hot.
- A fairly good description of a sun?

Best,

Stephen