[
link to www.whatreallyhappened.com]
Excerpt from History Channel documentary detailing evidence of Hitler´s supporters burning down the Reichstag in 1933
"If only the German courts knew then what Hersch Fischler knows now history might well have been very different"
The Reichstag Fire -
68 years on
The 9/11 Reichstag Fire
The Reichstag fire on February 27, 1933 was a disaster for Communists because they received the blame for starting it, but it was a dream come true for Hitler as it allowed him to transform Germany from a democracy into a dictatorship. The rest, as they say, is history.
Did the Bush administration try the same trick on September 11, 2001?
“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way”
Franklin D. Roosevelt
The victims of the 9/11 attacks have been disaster for Muslims because 19 Arabs were named as hijackers of the planes (even though 7 of the accused are alive), but they´ve been a dream come true for the PNAC ´think-tank´ who´s 2000 Statement of Principles stated a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" would advance their policies, i.e. justify wars and "regime changes".
The fact that Pearl Harbor was engineered by the US government to bring America into WWII would have been known by PNAC signatories...
10 [PNAC members] are now in the Bush administration. As well as Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, they include Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage; John Bolton, who is undersecretary of state for disarmament; and Zalmay Khalilzad, the White House liaison to the Iraqi opposition. Other signatories include William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard magazine, and Richard Perle, chairman of the advisory Defense Science Board. [ABC News 3/10/2003]
...so their statement actually referred to policy advancement through a governmentally orchestrated "catastrophic and catalyzing event" - Operation Northwoods is an example of this thinking.
The "new Pearl Harbor" occurred on 9/11...
Like his father, Bush tries to keep a daily diary of his thoughts and observations. That night, he dictated: "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today." [Washington Post]
...and now wars and "regime changes" are justified by the events of that day:
U.S. President George W Bush ... defended the war in Iraq, telling Americans the United States was forced into war because of the Sept 11 terror strikes. [Japan Today 17/06/05]
9/11 has brought PNAC´s policies to the fore, and Bush has stated it was a "Pearl Harbor" event, so was 9/11 the orchestrated event called for by PNAC?
Well, from July 26, 2001 John Ashcroft stopped traveling on commercial airlines:
In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a "threat assessment" by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term. [CBS News]
WTC staff were given evacuation drills prior to 9/11:
Ben Fountain, 42, a financial analyst with Fireman´s Fund, was coming out of the Chambers Street Station, headed for his office on the 47th floor of the south tower. "How could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we´d been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on." [People]
On September 10 top Pentagon officials were compelled to cancel travel plans:
On Sept. 10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns. [MSNBC 9/24/2001]
Also on September 10 Willie Brown, the former Mayor of San Francisco was warned about air travel:
Brown received a warning about 10 PM on the evening of September 10 to be cautious about air travel. He was scheduled to fly to into New York City. Brown refuses to say exactly who gave him the prescient warning, citing only “my security people at the airport.” [SFGate 9/12/2001]
President Bush´s cousin had a fortunate change of venue for a September 11 business conference:
President Bush´s cousin should have been in the World Trade Centre when it was attacked. Jim Pierce, managing director of AON Corporations, had arranged a business conference on the 105th floor of the South Tower where its New York offices were based. But his group was too large so they decided to move across the street to the Millennium Hotel. [Annova]
Finally, an imminent attack was forecast...
"The Director of the CIA warned that there could be an attack—an imminent attack—on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected." [Memory Hole]
...maybe that´s why FEMA was in New York on September 10.
You may say the above are coincidences, but ask yourself why the investigation into the WTC collapses was an underfunded farce. If an airliner truly brought down WTC 2 then why wasn´t an inquiry launched into this building´s collapse?
Video of DeMartini´s comments
"The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it, that was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building could probably sustain multiple impacts of jet liners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door - this intense grid - and the plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."
Aircraft Comparisons:
Boeing 707 - Boeing 767
The building withstood the plane´s impact and subsequently contained only office fires, yet it collapsed in less than an hour. Why wasn´t there a major investigation of this collapse?
How was it known that Bush was secure in Booker Elementary School during the attacks?
How was it known that the World Trade Center was going to collapse?
Why did explosions occur before the WTC collapses?
Why was WTC 7 rigged for demolition?
Why has no-one been held accountable for the lack of military response on 9/11?
Why do pre-9/11 inside trades on AA and UA options lead to the highest ranks of the CIA?
Why did Bush try to limit the 9/11 probe, starve it of funds, and obstruct investigations?
There can be only one reason: 9/11 wasn´t a surprise attack, it was a governmentally orchestrated "catastrophic and catalyzing event" - the Nazis burned the Reichstag, the Bush administration staged the 9/11 attacks.
The attacks had the desired catalysing effect [9/14/2001 CNN Newsclip] and they gave the US government the green light to start a pre-planned war.
Tony Blair. The Times, 17 July, 2002: "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11" [Guardian]
They also created a much needed enemy and stripped US citizens of liberties in the guise of fighting terrorism.
Watch the History Channel documentary excerpt detailing the burning of the Reichstag and note the parallels to today´s ´War on Terror´, then read these Bush family connections to 9/11 and dictatorship.
"If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I´m the dictator" - GW Bush (CNN 12/18/00)
Video download
216KB MPEG
Another ´al Qaeda´ attack will most likely result in America coming under military rule.
The Constitution of the United States would be consigned to history.
PATRIOT Act II would become legislation - not nice.
Plans for establishing civilian labor camps have already been drafted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
Fake Terror - The Road To War And Dictatorship
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Really Happened
[
link to www.whatreallyhappened.com]
