JUDGE TRAMPLES MY RIGHTS * JUDICIAL OPPRESSION | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1197931 United States 12/17/2010 03:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1182905 United States 12/17/2010 03:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ashes unplugged User ID: 1115888 United States 12/17/2010 03:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 776713 United States 12/17/2010 03:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 03:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nazi's and they don't care. I would think there would be a way to defeat the system on the car. Where there is a will there is a way. Quoting: Ashes unplugged 1115888There should be, but I don't want to jeapordize him. I made it clear in one call that I had up until now, supported the program, the judge, and my hubby. but that if they didn't remove the timer lock, I would no longer do that. And, that I would do all that I could to get around the illegal unconstitutional actions. I haven't yet mentioned that Civil Rights lawyers are more likely to do a pro bono on a case like this because they can make a name for themselves. Another tool would be taking the story to the media here. I did mention in my message to them on Thursday that I expected a solution and the removal of the timer tomorrow. **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 03:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Buy yourself a cheap car. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 776713My husband is on unemployment. We can't afford any extra fees that go along with a second car. We can't really afford to spring for a car either. A clunker is not safe for a woman either. But, we may have to do it. I'm not going to allow these Gestapo tactics against the innocent (me) to go unanswered in some way. **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 03:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | More than a triple post. WTF Last Edited by Texas Uncensored on 12/17/2010 03:27 AM **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 03:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | deleted triple post Last Edited by Texas Uncensored on 12/17/2010 03:26 AM **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 03:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | deleted other part of triple post. Last Edited by Texas Uncensored on 12/17/2010 03:26 AM **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Judeth
User ID: 1197905 United Kingdom 12/17/2010 03:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hiya TU. Ain't life a bitch with modern technology. But like someone just said who's name is on the pink slip? I hope things work out for you. I guess from now on it will be one drinks and the other drives, or take a taxi. Last Edited by Judeth on 12/17/2010 03:35 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1142115 United States 12/17/2010 03:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My first piece of advice would be to talk to an Texas lawyer for credible advice. Second: Most of your questions about what the judge can do are at this link (IMO): [link to law.onecle.com] It says the interlock can be placed on a vehicle owned by the defendant or the vehicle most regularly driven by the vehicle. So you may have to live with the timer if that is the vehicle he regularly drives. It might, if possible, be an idea to get a second vehicle registered in your name that he does not regularly drive. I don't see where the court would be able to force any sanction on you. (Unless of course you let him drive it and gets caught.) But that's just an opinion and I refer you to my first piece of advice. I have know idea of any particular case law that might contradict the law linked. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1142115 United States 12/17/2010 03:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My first piece of advice would be to talk to an Texas lawyer for credible advice. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1142115Second: Most of your questions about what the judge can do are at this link (IMO): [link to law.onecle.com] It says the interlock can be placed on a vehicle owned by the defendant or the vehicle most regularly driven by the defendant. So you may have to live with the timer if that is the vehicle he regularly drives. It might, if possible, be an idea to get a second vehicle registered in your name that he does not regularly drive. I don't see where the court would be able to force any sanction on you. (Unless of course you let him drive it and gets caught.) But that's just an opinion and I refer you to my first piece of advice. I have know idea of any particular case law that might contradict the law linked. Corrected a boo boo. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1177629 United States 12/17/2010 03:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1165172 United States 12/17/2010 03:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1197955 China 12/17/2010 03:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 875736 United States 12/17/2010 03:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 03:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hiya TU. Ain't life a bitch with modern technology. But like someone just said who's name is on the pink slip? I hope things work out for you. I guess from now on it will be one drinks and the other drives, or take a taxi. Quoting: JudethI don't drink. He doesn't drink. He's been sober for more than a year and a half. The interlock blow thing has been on the car for a long time. It malfunctions sometimes, but there haven't been any infractions at all. So, as he has been smooth sailing through the program, there is no excuse for the heavy handed tactics of the judge towards him. And there is no excuse for preventing me from using my property whenever I choose to drive. My driving record of 45 years is excellent. While the judge can decide to be tyrannical with him, she can not take my rights away to suit her mood. Last Edited by Texas Uncensored on 12/17/2010 03:58 AM **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 875736 United States 12/17/2010 04:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get an address in the closest state that is not a common property state for married couples. Take the car there, and register it. Then get plates on it from the other state and get your license there too. If his name is on the title, have him sell it to you, and get his name off. Make copies of your license, the title, new address, etc., with an order to show cause why the state of Texas should have the apparatus on your car as you are the only driver, you live in another state and you have no DUI history. They will have to take it off. I highly recommend AZ, as your closest state. On line services are excellent for DMV, after initial transfer, registration is cheap, license too. AZ also does not sign agreements with other states that will impact your license. |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 04:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My first piece of advice would be to talk to an Texas lawyer for credible advice. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1142115Second: Most of your questions about what the judge can do are at this link (IMO): [link to law.onecle.com] It says the interlock can be placed on a vehicle owned by the defendant or the vehicle most regularly driven by the vehicle. So you may have to live with the timer if that is the vehicle he regularly drives. It might, if possible, be an idea to get a second vehicle registered in your name that he does not regularly drive. I don't see where the court would be able to force any sanction on you. (Unless of course you let him drive it and gets caught.) But that's just an opinion and I refer you to my first piece of advice. I have know idea of any particular case law that might contradict the law linked. Is that you, D.? Thanks. I will head for the link. If the device had some way for it to determine who is driving, could lock him out, and let me drive, that would be one thing. But to lock the innocent away from using what is also my property can't be legal. IMO, it's reckless endangerment, a violation of my civil liberties, and violates joint property use law at the very least. **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 04:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get an address in the closest state that is not a common property state for married couples. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 875736Take the car there, and register it. Then get plates on it from the other state and get your license there too. If his name is on the title, have him sell it to you, and get his name off. Make copies of your license, the title, new address, etc., with an order to show cause why the state of Texas should have the apparatus on your car as you are the only driver, you live in another state and you have no DUI history. They will have to take it off. I highly recommend AZ, as your closest state. On line services are excellent for DMV, after initial transfer, registration is cheap, license too. AZ also does not sign agreements with other states that will impact your license. A title change from his name to mine would be seen as a violation of his agreement. But, I told him tonight that if the judge won't get off of my back, it's time to move away from her jurisdiction, and screw the program. **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1142115 United States 12/17/2010 04:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My first piece of advice would be to talk to an Texas lawyer for credible advice. Quoting: Texas UncensoredSecond: Most of your questions about what the judge can do are at this link (IMO): [link to law.onecle.com] It says the interlock can be placed on a vehicle owned by the defendant or the vehicle most regularly driven by the vehicle. So you may have to live with the timer if that is the vehicle he regularly drives. It might, if possible, be an idea to get a second vehicle registered in your name that he does not regularly drive. I don't see where the court would be able to force any sanction on you. (Unless of course you let him drive it and gets caught.) But that's just an opinion and I refer you to my first piece of advice. I have know idea of any particular case law that might contradict the law linked. Is that you, D.? Thanks. I will head for the link. If the device had some way for it to determine who is driving, could lock him out, and let me drive, that would be one thing. But to lock the innocent away from using what is also my property can't be legal. IMO, it's reckless endangerment, a violation of my civil liberties, and violates joint property use law at the very least. No -not D just a fluffy little AC. I get where you're coming from and agree the the treatment seems hard handed. The only other suggestion I can offer is to request for a hearing before the judge for a modification of the conditions citing the hardships medical and otherwise. A judge has a great deal of latitude and may entertain it if he/she feels you have standing. To declare a residency in another state and not living there implies an unsworn falsification of fact in the submission of your documents. Do so at your own risk and eyes open. Just sayin' |
Texas Uncensored
(OP) User ID: 1197929 United States 12/17/2010 04:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My first piece of advice would be to talk to an Texas lawyer for credible advice. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1142115Second: Most of your questions about what the judge can do are at this link (IMO): [link to law.onecle.com] It says the interlock can be placed on a vehicle owned by the defendant or the vehicle most regularly driven by the vehicle. So you may have to live with the timer if that is the vehicle he regularly drives. It might, if possible, be an idea to get a second vehicle registered in your name that he does not regularly drive. I don't see where the court would be able to force any sanction on you. (Unless of course you let him drive it and gets caught.) But that's just an opinion and I refer you to my first piece of advice. I have know idea of any particular case law that might contradict the law linked. Is that you, D.? Thanks. I will head for the link. If the device had some way for it to determine who is driving, could lock him out, and let me drive, that would be one thing. But to lock the innocent away from using what is also my property can't be legal. IMO, it's reckless endangerment, a violation of my civil liberties, and violates joint property use law at the very least. No -not D just a fluffy little AC. I get where you're coming from and agree the the treatment seems hard handed. The only other suggestion I can offer is to request for a hearing before the judge for a modification of the conditions citing the hardships medical and otherwise. A judge has a great deal of latitude and may entertain it if he/she feels you have standing. To declare a residency in another state and not living there implies an unsworn falsification of fact in the submission of your documents. Do so at your own risk and eyes open. Just sayin' Well, thanks fluffy little AC. LOL I am hoping that speaking with her direct assistant might achieve a breath of fresh air and some common sense. As hubby hasn't had any infractions, and has earned extra points, and promoted to final phase, this action is shocking and exceedingly harsh. If she wanted to come down hard, she should've have done it last year when the blow thing had only been on for a little while. But to do it now is to invite push back on our parts. I'm not into falsifying anything. And I did tell one of the assistants that I hoped they wouldn't push us into having to go around them, but that if forced to do so, I would. and that I hoped we could work out a solution. I left a message that that solution needs to be today. To do this without just cause at Christmas is outrageous. **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |