Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,820 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 11,982
Pageviews Today: 18,344Threads Today: 12Posts Today: 108
12:08 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Do Eurotards and Aussies WANT Americans to be disarmed??
Poster Handle Cuervo
Post Content
I notice that the vast majority of Eurotards and Aussies on this forum ridicule Americans because of the Americans resistance to being disarmed, and for love of their Constitutional rights.

Now, why on earth would these wonderful "free" global citizens WANT the NWO to further succeed in destroying the greatest (and only) real potential resistance that the NWO "elite" face?

If you don't want to be armed, then don't. But stop lashing out from across the pond, and attacking Americans for defending their Constitutional (and God-given) rights to self-defense.



First of all, that little thing you are doing with adding "tard" to the end of stuff to sound cool? Makes you sound like a douche. Second of all, both of those countries allow their citizens to own fire arms. I don't know why Americans think they are the only ones that can own a gun.



No Jackass. In those countries. You cant go to your next door neighbor and pay him 500 dollars cash for a 1911 or rifle.. like your buying a carton of milk. This is called a private sale. Something FREE people have access to.

The countries that your talking about have HEAVY regulations, restrictions, and registrations for all of their firearms. And if they are lucky enough to have the GOVERNMENT allow them to own one.... They cant ever take them outside their residence for personal protection. Thats the difference idiot.

Dont compare apples to oranges. Were the only country that has this luxury. Not like other countries where you have to wait 6-12 months for the government to decide whether you are able to own a rifle or not. (TO EVEN HUNT WITH)

bushfing



This is not correct. Making up stuff does not make you right. They do have restrictions, yes. BECAUSE THEY ARE FREAKING GUNS! American is the only country that has that institutional hazard, you are correct. It's not a luxury when you are a victim of a gun crime. The constitution was not written with Glocks in mind.



Hey ... Jackass. go look up your own statistics. You will see how much of a Jackass you really are...

More guns less crime. Look at places like new york with HIGH GUN CONROL! MORE CRIMES WITH GUNS FROM CRIMINALS THAT WILL GET THEM NO MATTER WHAT

"institutional hazard" are you kidding me?? Not only look up the statistics of crime rates where CITIZENS can obtain guns easily VS cities like New York where citizens are prohibited.

BUT ON TOP THIS JACKASS...

Over 2 million crimes are STOPPED DEAD IN THEIR TRACKS WITHOUT A SHOT BEING FIRED every YEAR.. by law abiding citizens.


Sorry that we dont like to call police and wait 20 minutes while our wives are being raped.



PS- places where you cant own guns... GO LUCK UP THEIR CRIME RATES FOR attacks with KNIFES!!!! People like you will never really get it until someone is threatening your life and you are a vicitim... Pathetic really.

bushfing
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 963270



Slow down there, Turbo. You are comparing crime rates within the US between states that have strict laws versus states that have lax laws. You ever think that maybe those laws were made more strict because the gun crime was high there? If you want to compare gun crime world-wide, be my guest. ( [link to www.nationmaster.com] America ranks number 7 the world.
I don't want to place our freedoms in a bad light but if you are going to spout generalizations, I have to defend the truth here. Oh, and quit calling people names. This isn't a play ground.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP