Does America Need Another Civil War?

one=the other...how can we be secure without liberty?

you can't.. there is no security. security is only what you make of it as an individual

If we start fighting ourselves China is going to come in and own our ass.

Liberty.... I can secure my own space

All according to plan

Everyone in mass needs to find Jesus. That's the only answer that's going to fix this. Otherwise it's doom on.

One event with external origins and any polarizing turns on a dime and focuses on that source.

Be very very careful what you state and the coments you make on line.

If I followed that rule I wouldn't have much to say.

As long as it's true, it's allowed.

i hear ya Booner

totally agree too

Well it is not going to happen and you already know this

Bosnia perhaps.

couldn't hurt

Think we can agree on that good Doctor.

Certain subjects and the comments made in relation to them have far ranging implications in as far as matters of the state are concerned.

civil war? nope .. i believe the people of the united states are to polarized on their everyday bullshit to even realize that it was even happening ... for them its all good in the hood long and they have their cell phones, game console's, TV, and credit cards their world is perfect, the would be lambs to the slaughter in the wrong scenario.

inevitably it will come to that. Maybe several factions...the government, occupying force, and other rebels

or the earth blows up tomorrow and none of this nonsense would matter

needs a dance off

Dr. Postman, do you Love Jesus/Yeshua?

I won't say we "need" one, but I will agree that it looks like one is coming.

If the beliefs of the two sides can not be reconciled through debate and compromise then there is only one choice left.

Personally, and having copious amounts of "real world" experience to reinforce my belief, I do not believe that the two sides can EVER come to terms with one another.

The "Security" camp is more than willing to surrender their rights and liberties for the mere illusion of security. If it only applied to those individuals there would be no issue. The disconnect comes because they will force their system upon those who do not desire, nor agree to, a completely controlled society.

The "Liberty" camp can not retain their Freedoms if the "Security" camp controls the government. The two paradigms are mutually exclusive. The "Liberty" camp, I'm pretty sure, would be more than willing to exist under an "Opt-in/Opt-out" system. (i.e. an air travel company that doesn't require porn scanner/cup checks as a travel option or a federal regulation/assistance free state or five) The likelihood of that occurring is approximately nil.

This is the crux of the matter: There is no possible outcome that is both agreeable and beneficial to both entities. In order for one to exist, the other must be destroyed.

False dichotomy promoted by TPTB.

Secession is a third option which can satisfy both sides.



.

Or just get rid of the main two MSM sponsered political parties and start over.

The England on the other hand does need a civil war, they have a very heavy karmic debt for all the civil wars they have stirred up the past 300 years.

Nobody needs it.

Need to chill out...lol

That's what I was angling towards. Succession is always followed by forceful "re-acquisition", or so history leads me to believe.

This country needs an Enema,........SO YES

That worked out well last time ...

A man once said the tree of liberty must be watered from time with the blood of patriots and tyrants

That same man was a founder of this country which leads me to believe that even heh felt the constitution could only hold tyrannical parties at bay so long before the tree must be watered again

It's wise to remain deeply skeptical where wars of fratricide are concerned; they often are the result of external instigation.