Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,073 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 494,849
Pageviews Today: 846,074Threads Today: 368Posts Today: 5,685
10:52 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1237903
Australia
01/22/2011 08:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
gamerfag ....,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1239722

cruise
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


How loving of you......
 Quoting: ajk


They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage.

If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line?

Where do you draw the line?

Man and man?

Man and dog?

Man and child?


Where?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I don't know where you draw the line, but I do know that I believe in equality for all consenting adults. If two men or two women want to marry, who are you or I to tell them they cannot?
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
What's wrong with polygamy??

How about One man and Multiple women??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1043297


Sure, and why not one man and thirty school girls? Hell, they love each other right? Why not a guy and his dog? A woman and her teenage student...I mean if we can marry and fuck just because we LOVE then there is no boundary right?
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
What's wrong with polygamy??

How about One man and Multiple women??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1043297


Nothing wrong with that at all, if all parties are consenting and happy.
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1239722
United States
01/22/2011 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
gamerfag .... If, as you say, it should be between two consenting adults, WHY do SO MANY FAGS 'queer' the YOUNG ????
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
gamerfag ....,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1239722

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1237903


you again, huh?

you like stalking me, don't you?

Last Edited by gamerprincess81 on 01/22/2011 08:18 PM
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
gamerfag .... If, as you say, it should be between two consenting adults, WHY do SO MANY FAGS 'queer' the YOUNG ????
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1239722


i'm sorry, i don't speak MORAN... did you make a typo? not quite sure what ""queer" the young" means...?

explain or correct yourself and i'll answer.
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 342395
United States
01/22/2011 08:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
Oh thank god, otherwise we wouldn't be distracted!
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage.

If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line?

Where do you draw the line?

Man and man?

Man and dog?

Man and child?


Where?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I don't know where you draw the line, but I do know that I believe in equality for all consenting adults. If two men or two women want to marry, who are you or I to tell them they cannot?
 Quoting: gamerprincess81

I'm saying the state should recognize a marriage between one man and one woman. Anything else is a private matter...The alternative is starting down the slippery slope...So do you approve of a consenting child marrying another consenting child?
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1237903
Australia
01/22/2011 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
gamerfag ....,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1239722

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1237903


you again, huh?

you like stalking me, don't you?
 Quoting: gamerprincess81

don't flatter yourself bushpig.
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I don't know where you draw the line, but I do know that I believe in equality for all consenting adults. If two men or two women want to marry, who are you or I to tell them they cannot?
 Quoting: gamerprincess81

I'm saying the state should recognize a marriage between one man and one woman. Anything else is a private matter...The alternative is starting down the slippery slope...So do you approve of a consenting child marrying another consenting child?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


No, definitely not. I see your point and what you are saying when talking about where do we draw the line. It's tricky, really.

I don't really advocate anyone under the age of 30 getting married. So many couples who marry in their 20's divorce within a few years if not sooner.

Again, not sure where to draw the line, just that I want equality. Hopefully that makes sense hf
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage.

If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line?

Where do you draw the line?

Man and man?

Man and dog?

Man and child?


Where?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


Firstly on the man marrying a child argument, that is ENTIRELY different and FAR from consensual. You're using an extreme case to base your prejudices on. That's number one, number two as to where our morals come from? How about simple common sense? Is that so hard of a concept to grasp? If you're hurting someone else in your actions, then more than likely something is wrong with what you are doing. No religious belief system needed to figure that one out is there?

Lastly, what if those kids have no other options? Would rather they have no parents at all to guide them? And who says the child they raise is gonna be automatically gay??
 Quoting: ajk


With your "logic" as long as the child doesn't object then that child can marry the parent...who are you to dictate who can love who?
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
gamerfag ....,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1239722

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1237903


you again, huh?

you like stalking me, don't you?
 Quoting: gamerprincess81

don't flatter yourself bushpig.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1237903


lol...alrighty then, kangaroo fucker!

stfu
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I don't know where you draw the line, but I do know that I believe in equality for all consenting adults. If two men or two women want to marry, who are you or I to tell them they cannot?
 Quoting: gamerprincess81

I'm saying the state should recognize a marriage between one man and one woman. Anything else is a private matter...The alternative is starting down the slippery slope...So do you approve of a consenting child marrying another consenting child?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


No, definitely not. I see your point and what you are saying when talking about where do we draw the line. It's tricky, really.

I don't really advocate anyone under the age of 30 getting married. So many couples who marry in their 20's divorce within a few years if not sooner.

Again, not sure where to draw the line, just that I want equality. Hopefully that makes sense hf
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


It makes sense to not redefine marriage.
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 252372
United States
01/22/2011 08:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


How loving of you......
 Quoting: ajk


They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage.

If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line?

Where do you draw the line?

Man and man?

Man and dog?

Man and child?


Where?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


First, DUMBASS, two "queers" don't raise children "to be queers", anymore than the two heterosexuals raised their child "to be queer". Second, two "queers" wouldn't have any children to adopt if it wasn't for the irresponsible heterosexuals fucking willy-nilly. Heterosexuals fucking willy-nilly is a disservice to OUR planet.

If you're so generous that you would allow the "queers" to live together, then why can't they enter into a legal binding contract called "marriage", and then of course divorce later like all the heterosexuals get to do?
ajk

User ID: 1114631
United States
01/22/2011 08:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


Firstly on the man marrying a child argument, that is ENTIRELY different and FAR from consensual. You're using an extreme case to base your prejudices on. That's number one, number two as to where our morals come from? How about simple common sense? Is that so hard of a concept to grasp? If you're hurting someone else in your actions, then more than likely something is wrong with what you are doing. No religious belief system needed to figure that one out is there?

Lastly, what if those kids have no other options? Would rather they have no parents at all to guide them? And who says the child they raise is gonna be automatically gay??
 Quoting: ajk


With your "logic" as long as the child doesn't object then that child can marry the parent...who are you to dictate who can love who?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I'm not exactly sure a child can really make such a choice of their own volition though, with their minds being what they are.
No one is perfect. A babe before walking will first stumble and fall many times but NEVER gives up until he succeeds.

Always remember, ultimately, to never follow any person's belief. Your relationship with God is between you and God.

If nothing else, remember this: religion = subservience, control and conformity, the same template as EVERY government

"Most believers would kill truth if truth threatened their religion." L. K. Washburn

"This crime called blasphemy was invented by priests for the purpose of defending doctrines not able to take care of themselves." Robert Ingersoll

"If anyone wants to know how God feels, it's a warm light as if the sun is poking through dark clouds and lifting your spirits with pure joy."
Nikki_LaVey

User ID: 1120752
United States
01/22/2011 08:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
Brief I'm sorry the world is changing but the world always does that.
How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


Firstly on the man marrying a child argument, that is ENTIRELY different and FAR from consensual. You're using an extreme case to base your prejudices on. That's number one, number two as to where our morals come from? How about simple common sense? Is that so hard of a concept to grasp? If you're hurting someone else in your actions, then more than likely something is wrong with what you are doing. No religious belief system needed to figure that one out is there?

Lastly, what if those kids have no other options? Would rather they have no parents at all to guide them? And who says the child they raise is gonna be automatically gay??
 Quoting: ajk


With your "logic" as long as the child doesn't object then that child can marry the parent...who are you to dictate who can love who?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I'm not exactly sure a child can really make such a choice of their own volition though, with their minds being what they are.
 Quoting: ajk


I'm not sure a person who goes against nature is qualified to make such decisions either.
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


I don't know where you draw the line, but I do know that I believe in equality for all consenting adults. If two men or two women want to marry, who are you or I to tell them they cannot?
 Quoting: gamerprincess81

I'm saying the state should recognize a marriage between one man and one woman. Anything else is a private matter...The alternative is starting down the slippery slope...So do you approve of a consenting child marrying another consenting child?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


No, definitely not. I see your point and what you are saying when talking about where do we draw the line. It's tricky, really.

I don't really advocate anyone under the age of 30 getting married. So many couples who marry in their 20's divorce within a few years if not sooner.

Again, not sure where to draw the line, just that I want equality. Hopefully that makes sense hf
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


It makes sense to not redefine marriage.
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. I'm not going to argue your opinion with you, but it is not the opinion of everyone out there.
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 342395
United States
01/22/2011 08:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
see?

distracted!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 252372
United States
01/22/2011 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I don't know where you draw the line, but I do know that I believe in equality for all consenting adults. If two men or two women want to marry, who are you or I to tell them they cannot?
 Quoting: gamerprincess81

I'm saying the state should recognize a marriage between one man and one woman. Anything else is a private matter...The alternative is starting down the slippery slope...So do you approve of a consenting child marrying another consenting child?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


Children can't give "consent". But, of course, different states have different ages of consent. I believe in some states, a parent can give "consent" for an adult man to "marry" a otherwise legal "child". You heterosexual men are so funny.
Nikki_LaVey

User ID: 1120752
United States
01/22/2011 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
see?

distracted!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 342395


We're good at multitasking!
How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage.

If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line?

Where do you draw the line?

Man and man?

Man and dog?

Man and child?


Where?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender.

If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one!

And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country.

In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world.

Haters will be haters. Keep on hating.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage.

If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


First, DUMBASS, two "queers" don't raise children "to be queers", anymore than the two heterosexuals raised their child "to be queer". Second, two "queers" wouldn't have any children to adopt if it wasn't for the irresponsible heterosexuals fucking willy-nilly. Heterosexuals fucking willy-nilly is a disservice to OUR planet.

If you're so generous that you would allow the "queers" to live together, then why can't they enter into a legal binding contract called "marriage", and then of course divorce later like all the heterosexuals get to do?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 252372



Like I said: if you start down the slippery slope, then where do you draw the line?

Man on man ok

Man on goat ok

Man on child ok

If you throw out the laws of nature you are changing what it means to be human...
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...

I'm saying the state should recognize a marriage between one man and one woman. Anything else is a private matter...The alternative is starting down the slippery slope...So do you approve of a consenting child marrying another consenting child?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


No, definitely not. I see your point and what you are saying when talking about where do we draw the line. It's tricky, really.

I don't really advocate anyone under the age of 30 getting married. So many couples who marry in their 20's divorce within a few years if not sooner.

Again, not sure where to draw the line, just that I want equality. Hopefully that makes sense hf
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


It makes sense to not redefine marriage.
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. I'm not going to argue your opinion with you, but it is not the opinion of everyone out there.
 Quoting: gamerprincess81


If you are so open minded then why not marriage between a consenting child and an adult? Who are you to say that the child is too young? What gives you the right to decide?
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 252372
United States
01/22/2011 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


Firstly on the man marrying a child argument, that is ENTIRELY different and FAR from consensual. You're using an extreme case to base your prejudices on. That's number one, number two as to where our morals come from? How about simple common sense? Is that so hard of a concept to grasp? If you're hurting someone else in your actions, then more than likely something is wrong with what you are doing. No religious belief system needed to figure that one out is there?

Lastly, what if those kids have no other options? Would rather they have no parents at all to guide them? And who says the child they raise is gonna be automatically gay??
 Quoting: ajk


With your "logic" as long as the child doesn't object then that child can marry the parent...who are you to dictate who can love who?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I'm not exactly sure a child can really make such a choice of their own volition though, with their minds being what they are.
 Quoting: ajk


I'm not sure a person who goes against nature is qualified to make such decisions either.
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


Well, I think most heterosexual men's nature is to fuck any woman that would say yes, and then some of them even fuck the ones that say no. So "marriage" isn't "natural".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1237750
United States
01/22/2011 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
They ought to cancel marriage altogether from the law and just call it a civil union, so that marriage becomes a social definition only.
Nikki_LaVey

User ID: 1120752
United States
01/22/2011 08:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island

How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all
gamerprincess81  (OP)

User ID: 1033168
United States
01/22/2011 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
They ought to cancel marriage altogether from the law and just call it a civil union, so that marriage becomes a social definition only.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1237750


Now, there is an idea!!
:gp81:

"Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.."

PS3- PollyPlssyPants
XBL- gamerprincss420
Nikki_LaVey

User ID: 1120752
United States
01/22/2011 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island

How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT

User ID: 1220677
United States
01/22/2011 08:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island
...


With your "logic" as long as the child doesn't object then that child can marry the parent...who are you to dictate who can love who?
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


I'm not exactly sure a child can really make such a choice of their own volition though, with their minds being what they are.
 Quoting: ajk


I'm not sure a person who goes against nature is qualified to make such decisions either.
 Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT


Well, I think most heterosexual men's nature is to fuck any woman that would say yes, and then some of them even fuck the ones that say no. So "marriage" isn't "natural".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 252372


Fine. It's always up to the female anyway...let's not redefine it then :)
Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support!

:Brieffromnativea:





GLP