Giffords Brain Transplant Into 9 Year Old Clone

More Hileman ham:

"Suzi doesn't want to discuss the accused gunman. She says, 'how this all happened and who did this? It's not really part of our story.'

For Suzi, the story centers around a little girl... her 9-year old buddy that she got to mentor."

[link to www.kvoa.com]

Strange that she doesn't want to say something along the lines of "yes I saw the shooter shoot Christina".

Last Edited by Plautus on 01/28/2011 02:21 PM

A glimpse of the state of stem cell research:

"The use of stem cells to repair or replace damaged brain tissue is a new and exciting avenue of research. A neural stem cell is a special kind of cell that can multiply and give rise to other more specialized cell types. These cells are found in adult neural tissue and normally develop into several different cell types found within the central nervous system. NINDS researchers are investigating the ability of stem cells to develop into neurotransmitter-producing neurons, specifically dopamine-producing cells."

[link to www.ninds.nih.gov]

This is just the information the NIH has released into the public domain.

Published papers tell a slightly different story:

"Transplanted Neural Stem Cells Survive, Differentiate, and Improve Neurological Motor Function after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury"

[link to journals.lww.com]

It's clear neural stem cells can be used to knit parts of a damaged brain back together and restore function. Again, this is only what's been released to the public domain.

The short version of this is the researchers gave mice brain damage, from blunt force and from mock surgeries, to assess the ability of neural stem cells to repair the damage. Mice given human kidney stem cells as a "control" showed less improvement. Aside from the very weird choice of human kidney stem cells as a "control", this shows stem cells perform well to repair brain tissue.

As for why human kidney stem cells were used as a "control", it would seem this was a separate experiment in itself. The results of that experiment appear to be unpublished. I wonder what they learned by injecting human embryo kidney cells into mice brains. :| It didn't increase their motor function. What DID it do?

Last Edited by Plautus on 01/28/2011 02:21 PM

Sounds like brain injury to me.


This place can be sad.

Giffords pushed stem cell research funding:

"But Giffords lost the support of many of the independent voters in her district over her backing of the health care reform law. She is also a strong supporter of abortion rights and embryonic stem-cell research."

[link to washingtonexaminer.com]

Is this operation part of a quid pro quo for her participation in getting the taxpayers to fund it all? These people have bottomless pockets. Right now it's just the "neuronauts" that get to go on this ride. Some day it will be all the rulers, their clones will be ruling us for the next million years.

The coupling of abortion rights and embryonic stem cell research is an obvious choice. Where else are you going to get all those human embryo stem cells if not from human embryos?

I found the following:

"Gabby Giffords on Abortion"

[link to www.ontheissues.org]

Which states:

"Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.
Allows federal funding for research that utilizes human embryonic stem cells, regardless of the date on which the stem cells were derived from a human embryo, provided such embryos:

1. have been donated from in vitro fertilization clinics;
2. were created for the purposes of fertility treatment;
3. were in excess of the needs of the individuals seeking such treatment and would otherwise be discarded; and
4. were donated by such individuals with written informed consent and without any financial or other inducements."

This fits the profile of somebody who wants to clone themselves, use some of the embryos as stem cell treatments and have their brain transplanted into a young clone.

More published research on neurological stem cell research:

"Copyright © 2004, American Society for Clinical Investigation
Research Article
Neuronally expressed stem cell factor induces neural stem cell migration to areas of brain injury"

The implications of this paper are that stem cells exhibit a "migration" tendency whereby they repair damage. In this case the test animals were mice with deliberate forebrain damage. The reason for the focus on forebrain damage is unclear.

More quid pro quo:

"January 11, 2007
This Bill Gives Hope to 100 Million Americans Affected by Debilitating or Life-Threatening Diseases and Their Families

Washington, D.C. - Rep Gabrielle Giffords voted today to significantly expand federal funding for stem cell research, a move that will directly impact the quality of life for millions of Americans suffering from diseases such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and diabetes."

Federal government seeking monopoly on technology, no surprise:

"States lack the revenue, infrastructure, and incentives to properly promote basic research on their own, especially with federal policies that limit collaboration, impede their funding, and fail to provide guidelines for moving forward with research."

[link to www.americanprogress.org]

Federal laws basically inhibit any research below federal level.

"The federal government provides the lion’s share of funding for stem cell research—79.4 percent through 2007—and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The federal government will even spend more specifically on embryonic stem cell research than the states, meaning that unless we update our stem cell policy, at least 55 percent of the funding currently designated for embryonic stem cell research through 2018 will go to research on outdated stem cell lines."

!!!! Finally I thought this was a rly weird coincidence maybe op is onto something. 
All i know is I stumbled onto those photos accidentally one night doing research. The two appear to be the same person. Same facial features and what not. Ima pin this on my personal to see where it goes. Thanks op this is interesting

Last Edited by LunaLu on 01/28/2011 03:12 PM

THIS

"NIH v. the States

$641 million: Amount to be spent by NIH on all stem cell research in FY2007

$147 million: Amount to be spent by NIH on embryonic stem cell research in FY2007"

[link to www.americanprogress.org]

"Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 May-Jun;38(3):40-7.

A review of the consent forms signed by those who donated embryos for the NIH-approved embryonic stem cell lines reveals several problems, providing ethical as well as scientific reasons to overturn the Bush administration's restrictions on federal funding for stem cell research."

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

A member of congress could probably run on a simple microcomputer.

"March 9, 2009

President Barack Obama removed restrictions on the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research put in place by the Bush administration, fulfilling a controversial campaign promise. He also issued on Monday a presidential memorandum intended to further separate politics and science."

[link to www.npr.org]

Removed restrictions on federal funding? What does that even mean, in light of the budget of over 140 million in 2007 specifically for embryonic stem cell research? Does that mean it was opened up to smaller scale enterprise? That means it's being scaled up for mass application.

"Already, however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last month approved the request of Geron Corp., a California-based biotech, to proceed with the first human test using an embryonic stem cell-based treatment. New England stem cell advocates believe such developments could change the market completely — and even enable the creation of new technologies.

“If I were to make a prediction, I would say there’s a 95 percent certainty you’ll see more startups and see a significant investment by established pharmaceutical companies and venture capitalists,” said Gary Stein, interim director of the University of Massachusetts program in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine."

[link to www.masshightech.com]

The above is from Friday, February 6, 2009. Note the FDA approval prior to lifting of the "ban".

Last Edited by Plautus on 01/28/2011 03:22 PM

If they can do this


Thread: DEAD dogs brought back to life after 3 hours...university of Pittsburgh

I'm almost certain this subject is possible. I mean come on. Raising the dead is pretty much what they've done to the dogs. Now Giffords, she was dead confirmed, then alive, confirmed, then dead confirmed, then alive and radically healed...........

On GLP, it's brian.

"Rehab Underway, Doc Calls Giffords 'Miraculous'"

[link to www.cbsnews.com]

"Doctors for Giffords have described her recovery as something of a miracle as she made quick and substantial progress."

[link to thehill.com]

"Gabrielle Gifford’s medical care here in Houston has given focus to several stories of miracles made at TIRR Memorial Hermann."

[link to www.myfoxhouston.com]

"A Washington Post story about the survival of Gabrielle Giffords reports that it was less a miracle than a matter of inconceivable gains in medical treatment."

[link to www.slate.com]

"On Jan. 11, her neurosurgeon, Dr. Michael Lemole, said of her recovery thus far, “We’re wise to acknowledge miracles.”"

[link to communities.washingtontimes.com]

Doctors have described her progress so far as nothing short of a miracle.

[link to theusdaily.com]

"It truly is a miracle that we get to see unfold."

[link to www.digtriad.com]

"Both nurses say playing a role in what some are calling Giffords' miracle recovery gave them moments to remember."

[link to www.kgun9.com]

"Her recovery has been nothing short of miraculous, to borrow a phrase from her other doctor, Michael Lemore, who also attended their daily briefings."

[link to www.theaustralian.com.au]

"Doctors at UMC have said her recovery since being shot Jan. 8 is a miracle."

[link to www.azbiz.com]

"Well-wishers lined Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ ambulance route to the airport Friday, cheering, waving American flags, and hoisting signs urging “Get Well Gabby!” as the congresswoman embarked on a long journey of rehabilitation already being hailed as a “medical miracle” and “divine intervention.”"

[link to www.newsmax.com]

All of this goes to show you what we all really know, that Giffords is just a superior human being, better than all the rest of us, and those kinds of people simply don't react to bullets the same way as the rest of us, as countless movies from Hollywood demonstrate.

"'Medical miracles do not happen simply by accident,' Obama said Monday. 'They result from painstaking and costly research; from years of lonely trial and error, much of which never bears fruit; and from a government willing to support that work,' he said."

[link to www.npr.org]

I have another thread discussing the patsy here:

Thread: Loughner's defense

Last Edited by Plautus on 01/28/2011 03:36 PM

"Stem cell exodus?

Embryonic stem cell funding flows again – for now. But stop-and-go funding and continued legal wrangling could push researchers of cells from human embryos to pursue other fields."

[link to www.csmonitor.com]

"For all the national angst it generates, hESC research remains a surprisingly small part of stem-cell research. Over the past five years, it has received $530 million in federal funding, only about 3.5 percent of total stem-cell dollars.

Where does the rest of the money go? Half of all private funding and 9 of 10 federal dollars go to stem cells culled from adults, bone marrow, umbilical cords, or animals."

This "ban" doesn't really affect privately funded research at all. Releasing federal funding dollars to certain institutions is a way for them to control the development of the technology and have the taxpayers foot the bill, getting none of the benefits. It's doled out in a very careful fashion and then controlled strictly throughout the research.

Last Edited by Plautus on 01/28/2011 03:45 PM

Privately funded stem cell research:

"Setting aside commercial efforts like those of the California biotech company Geron, consider a few examples of private funding for academic stem-cell research. The Starr Foundation is providing $50 million over three years for human embryonic stem-cell research at three New York City medical institutions, including the Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Center. Weill Cornell Medical College, also in New York City, has established the Ansary Center for Stem Cell Therapeutics with a $15 million grant from philanthropists Shahla and Hushang Ansary.

In California, UCLA has established an Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Medicine with $20 million in funding over the next five years. Stanford University created the Institute for Cancer/Stem Cell Biology and Medicine, with a goal of $120 million in funding. An anonymous donor gave Johns Hopkins University a $58.5 million gift to launch an Institute for Cell Engineering. The University of Minnesota has set up a Stem Cell Institute with a $15 million capital grant. A grateful patient pledged $25 million over the next 10 years to finance stem-cell research at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston."

The "private" stem cell research amounts to about 4 billion dollars. Half of which is embryonic stem cell research. There's no shortage of embryonic stem cell research going on, despite federal funding "bans". Select companies with the best performance are no doubt chosen for the next rounds of federal funding, which are relatively small but very surgically applied.

Last Edited by Plautus on 01/28/2011 03:48 PM

We don't even know if this woman was shot at all.

Just like 9/11, this whole Giffords story stinks to high heaven.

Many of us still think Hon. Judge Roll was the true target and the whole Giffords thing is a cover for it.

Don't believe ANYTHING the mainstream media or government tells you... not really sure how to discern truth anymore, but I know if they tell us something is "true", then we can at least eliminate that one as false.

"It’s understandable that researchers are tempted by the prospect of easy money from government sources, but as the record shows, getting government funding is not worth the effort. Only private funding lets researchers do what they need to and leads to truly reliable results."

[link to www.genengnews.com]

^this, though I am not totally discounting OP's thread. Sounds cliche, but "truth is stranger than fiction."

Can such evil be done in secret facilities around the world? I think that they probably can and probably are.

I'm afraid that I don't have a Chick tract for this one. But there is one about abortion that shows the fate that must be in store for those involved with this and similar evils, if they die in their sins.

WHO MURDERED CLARICE?... [link to www.chick.com]

In many cases we find out the "truth" has already been told to us in fiction, take this movie Rampage that came out last year. The character in that movie set up a patsy. And look at all the foreshadowing of the World Trade Center demolition there is movies that came out before. It's called predictive programming.

I don't see what's so evil about it.

I'll make a prediction (not a prophecy). That if you die in your sins, that 10 million years from tonight you will have thought about this post of mine, warning you of the awful consequence's of your madness, almost times without number.

As you burn in hell. Snap out of it while you are still blessed with a little time you stupid fool.

um

Disaffected foster parents of Giffords' mini me:

[link to www.youtube.com]

More bizarre behaviour from Giffords' mini me foster parents:

[link to www.youtube.com]

"the way she left the world yesterday is obviously one everyone else will remember, we're gonna remember her for the nine years we had her"

"This shouldn't happen in this country, or anywhere else, but in a free society we're gonna be subject to people like this. I prefer this to the alternative."

What alternative is he talking about? The alternative where Christina wasn't shot and killed on a sidewalk? Assuming he thinks that's what happened.