So you want a Revolution!

No, I don't. It would be the end of the USA. Who knows how many would die in the ensuing anarchy, and we'd probably end up with worse leaders filling the power vacuum. I much prefer reform.

Sadly yes they do and some of those children will be killed, raped and tortured before it is over.

So you raised boot licking slaves. Bravo OP.

No, I want an impeachment trial.

ouch..the old neck punch...that tickles...

dont feel so bad jarhead....i would like to kick Nikki's ass too

And maybe, just maybe THE REST OF THE POPLULATION WILL BE BETTER OFF.. NOT BEING OPPRESSED BY THE SAME PEOPLE OPPRESSING US.

You're just being selfish, trying to find some kind of pseudo-psychological benefit for being a coward.

None of you jackoffs have a viable plan for after the 'revolution'.

Answer : Government reform, finding new ways to rape the working peoples wallets,bank accounts and destroy the Bill of Rights..

Selfish when it comes to my children ... Yes!

Coward .... No!

So you prefer Anarchy to reform? Law by the Biggest Gun?

Maybe your right, our own military are going to storm our houses and rape our children and steal our massive build up of spaggetios and corn chips..

I would rather my children KNOW the kind of evils they are up against and be able to properly defend themselves when needed. Rather than put them on a boat rendering them helpless against UNKNOWN forces.

Ancient Greece was based on Free Market Anarchism

So you prefer Anarchy to reform? Law by the Biggest Gun?

:chirp chirp:

Free Market Anarchism

Our own Military has Bombed American Civilians before.

Google "blair mountain rebellion" some time, it's part of American History they don't tell you in school.

Our own Military has Bombed American Civilians before.

Google "blair mountain rebellion" some time, it's part of American History they don't tell you in school.

And the often had wars between their own City States!

Free Market Anarchism

Cool, I'm big, a trained fighter, and have lots of guns.

I will rule my town with an iron fist.

A better understanding of the concept can be derived from the Greek origins of the word (anarkhos) which meant "without a ruler." It is this definition of the word that members of the political power structure (i.e., your "rulers") do not want you to consider. Far better that you fear the hidden monsters and hobgoblins who are just waiting to bring terror and havoc to your lives should efforts to increase police powers or budgets fail.

Are there murderers, kidnappers, rapists, and arsonists in our world? Of course there are, and there will always be, and they do not all work for the state. It is amazing that, with all the powers and money conferred upon the state to "protect" us from such threats, they continue to occur with a regularity that seems to have increased with the size of government!

Nor can we ignore the history of the state in visiting upon humanity the very death and destruction that its defenders insist upon as a rationale for political power. Those who condemn anarchy should engage in some quantitative analysis. In the twentieth century alone, governments managed to kill — through wars, genocides, and other deadly practices — some 200,000,000 men, women, and children. How many people were killed by anarchists during this period? Governments, not anarchists, have been the deadly "bomb-throwers" of human history!

OK have you ever thought about what wil happen to the Children? Don't you know you can count me out!

Doctors in Iraq and the former Yugoslavia believe DU has had a dramatic impact on children of war in those regions.
Dr. Asad Eesa, chief resident at the children's and maternity hospital in Basra in southern Iraq, recently treated an 8 1/2-year-old girl who lives in an area where depleted uranium ammunition was fired during the Gulf War.

Her prognosis is poor.

"She has an abdominal tumor, neural plastoma, near the kidney," said Eesa, as the crying little girl sat on the floor of a hospital corridor with her mother. "Surely she will die."

[link to www.warchildren.org]

Many children suffer appalling violence as soldiers, but even those who remain 'civilians' can be subjected to horrific experiences. Anything that can be done to adults, however monstrous, can also be visited on children. Children have been tortured as part of collective punishments for whole communities, or as a means of extracting information about peers or parents. They have also been tortured as a way of punishing their parents, or in some cases simply for entertainment. Once immersed in this savage environment, differences of age soon seem irrelevant.

This also means that children are as likely as adults to be captured and imprisoned. The treatment of child prisoners is a matter of increasing concern—particularly in Rwanda where, for the first time in history, children have been imprisoned and are facing trial for genocide.

[link to www.unicef.org]

I am fully aware of Blair Mountain, as EVERYONE should be.

However I really do think you're underestimating how far and wide this "revolution" spans.

They've all said it.

"You're either with us or against us". You think the US is the U.S military? Or even The USG? Nope, the "US" are the ones who want to control the WORLD through banking, starvation and preventable diseases. Rioting in the U.s is the least of my worries.

The battle lines are being drawn as we argue over this stupid topic.

I'm not trying to be an asshole because you can make some really good points sometimes, but with this topic, I think your thinking is flawed.

nice avatar update,nikki.ya look meaner....

Well if I didn't have children and still had both my legs I would most likely think different. I still own among other things sniper rifles and automatic weapons. I can out shoot most humans on this planet (I use to shoot competition). My flaw is with one leg movement is a great issue.

I grew up learning survival skills and I will use those skills to keep my family safe.

LOL, theres always someone who has bigger guns.

Free-market anarchism (sometimes called simply market anarchism,[1] and occasionally libertarian anarchism[2] or propertarian anarchism)[3] refers to an individualist anarchist philosophy in which monopoly of force held by government would be replaced by a competitive market of non-monopolistic organizations providing security, justice, and other defense services. A market would exist where providers of security and law compete for voluntarily paying customers that wish to receive the services rather than individuals being taxed without their consent and assigned a monopoly provider of force.[4] The belief, among free-market anarchists, is that this competition thus will tend to produce cheaper and higher-quality legal and police services including "a high-quality good of impartial, efficient umpiring of conflicting rights claims".[5]
The term describes the type of anarchy proposed by anarcho-capitalism and the philosophies that prefigurated it.[3] In this sense, notable proponents of free-market anarchism include Benjamin Tucker,[6] Lysander Spooner,[7] Murray Rothbard[8] and David D. Friedman.[1] Free-market anarchism has been traced as far back as the 1840s, as conceived by individuals such as Julius Faucher and Gustave de Molinari.[9][10]