Breaking: Nine Quakes Rattle Mount Saint Helens!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 956570 United States 01/31/2011 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "The most powerful quake measured just 2.2 on the Richter Scale. " 2.2? Really? Is that the best she can do? We have those all the time. You want to worry about a volcanic mountain in WA? Worry about Mt. Rainier. I was here when St. Helens exploded in 1980. It is an ash mountain. No lava. If Rainier blows, Seatac is gone. Boeing is gone. Most of the cities south of Seattle are gone. Or maybe worry about Mt. Baker. If he blows, Bellingham is gone. This is part of the ring of fire. But a 2.2 earthquake is nothing. Wake me when there is an earthquake of 5.0 or more. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 846553 United States 01/31/2011 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Swarms at MSH happen every once in awhile. We'll have to just wait and see what happens. Beautiful spot really, worth the drive out there. Had a dream once that Rainier and Mt. Baker both erupted the same day...always wondered if that was a premonition. |
Juniper from Jupiter
(OP) User ID: 1214567 United States 01/31/2011 02:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1250762 United States 01/31/2011 02:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVES
User ID: 1238305 United States 01/31/2011 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the article, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 956570"The most powerful quake measured just 2.2 on the Richter Scale. " 2.2? Really? Is that the best she can do? We have those all the time. You want to worry about a volcanic mountain in WA? Worry about Mt. Rainier. I was here when St. Helens exploded in 1980. It is an ash mountain. No lava. If Rainier blows, Seatac is gone. Boeing is gone. Most of the cities south of Seattle are gone. Or maybe worry about Mt. Baker. If he blows, Bellingham is gone. This is part of the ring of fire. But a 2.2 earthquake is nothing. Wake me when there is an earthquake of 5.0 or more. I read somewhere that they recently change the EARTHQUAKE scale. In other words what use to be called a 5.3 is now called a 4.3. But each one point om the Rhicter scale is really a magnitude of 100 not 1. Does this make sense and has anyone else heard of this? Last Edited by WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVES on 01/31/2011 02:42 PM The process has begun |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1209397 United States 01/31/2011 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1169540 United States 01/31/2011 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1169540 United States 01/31/2011 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 956570 United States 01/31/2011 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere that they recently change the EARTHQUAKE scale. In other words what use to be called a 5.3 is now called a 4.3. But each one point om the Rhicter scale is really a magnitude of 100 not 1. Does this make sense and has anyone else heard of this? Quoting: WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVESNope, wasn't aware of this. Got a link? |
ºEATº
User ID: 1097642 Canada 01/31/2011 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Juniper from Jupiter
(OP) User ID: 1214567 United States 01/31/2011 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 956570 United States 01/31/2011 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Juniper from Jupiter
(OP) User ID: 1214567 United States 01/31/2011 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 956570 Good site. Thanks for sharing! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1137964 United States 01/31/2011 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the article, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 956570"The most powerful quake measured just 2.2 on the Richter Scale ... 2.2? Really? Is that the best she can do? We have those all the time ... But a 2.2 earthquake is nothing. Wake me when there is an earthquake of 5.0 or more." Smaller quakes may indicate magma movement rather than plate tectonic movement. "Red-Hot Magma, Mr. Powers" ... |
WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVES
User ID: 1238305 United States 01/31/2011 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere that they recently change the EARTHQUAKE scale. In other words what use to be called a 5.3 is now called a 4.3. But each one point om the Rhicter scale is really a magnitude of 100 not 1. Does this make sense and has anyone else heard of this? Quoting: WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVESNope, wasn't aware of this. Got a link? Ok, there are 2 different scales one is Ricter and one is Mercalli. Thread: The Richter Earthquake Scale The process has begun |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 898092 United States 01/31/2011 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mama Teri
User ID: 1217576 United States 01/31/2011 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the article, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 956570"The most powerful quake measured just 2.2 on the Richter Scale. " 2.2? Really? Is that the best she can do? We have those all the time. You want to worry about a volcanic mountain in WA? Worry about Mt. Rainier. I was here when St. Helens exploded in 1980. It is an ash mountain. No lava. If Rainier blows, Seatac is gone. Boeing is gone. Most of the cities south of Seattle are gone. Or maybe worry about Mt. Baker. If he blows, Bellingham is gone. This is part of the ring of fire. But a 2.2 earthquake is nothing. Wake me when there is an earthquake of 5.0 or more. Have to agree with this. St Helens has had numerous small eruptions and thousands of quakes both pre and post the 1980 eruption. Even if it does erupt again it will be nothing like the magnitude of the 1980 eruption. The lava dome is not big, or solid, enough to create another devestating eruption. To those of us who live in her shadow we aren't concerned about these small, deep, quakes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1210630 Canada 01/31/2011 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1246107 United States 01/31/2011 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 956570 United States 01/31/2011 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere that they recently change the EARTHQUAKE scale. In other words what use to be called a 5.3 is now called a 4.3. But each one point om the Rhicter scale is really a magnitude of 100 not 1. Does this make sense and has anyone else heard of this? Quoting: WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVESNope, wasn't aware of this. Got a link? Ok, there are 2 different scales one is Ricter and one is Mercalli. Thread: The Richter Earthquake Scale Interesting. It sounds like the Mercalli scale is older and not used in modern news stories. So, when earthquakes are measured today, they're measured by the Richter scale. In which case, a 2.2 still is very minor. A 4.0 may be felt, if you're close to the epicenter. But, even a 4.0 isn't really a big deal. A 2 or a 3 is rarely even felt. Just ask a Californian. Alaska has way more earthquakes than anywhere else in the US. But, it's so sparsely populated, nobody talks about it. 8.0 earthquakes aren't unheard of up there. But, very few people are impacted by them. When the Pacific NW gets "the big one" it will be way worse than anything San Francisco or Los Angeles has ever seen. Our big fault line acts different than the San Andreas. The San Andreas slides back and forth and lets off steam. Our major fault line crashes into each other. We're supposed to be long overdue for "the big one", but I've lived my whole life here and still haven't seen "the big one". I don't do fear. |
popcorn
User ID: 1191137 United States 01/31/2011 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.mynorthwest.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 956570 United States 01/31/2011 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey this is a sweet map of the PNW (Washington State, Oregon and British Columbia. Maybe Idaho too depending on who you ask.). The map shows magnitude and date. Quoting: popcorn[link to www.mynorthwest.com] Got it from the original link. :D |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1165172 United States 01/31/2011 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 919411 United States 01/31/2011 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the heck is a technological disaster? I mean, I have never seen that on that map. And there are two of them. Quoting: Mother Maryusually those are building collapses. and there were 4 yesterday That's a little... weird. Here's my 2 cents on the increase in incidents of building collapse issue: The earth is constantly shaking or vibrating now all the time. The wobble is becoming more pronounced. Over time, this activity causes buildings to collapse that otherwise would not have done so. |
sons of scotland User ID: 746657 United States 01/31/2011 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 846553 United States 01/31/2011 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 956570 Cool website, thanks! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1180899 United States 01/31/2011 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Yee Haw
User ID: 1250519 United States 01/31/2011 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1165172 United States 01/31/2011 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well it did say it was a fault line eg and not a volcanic eq. Quoting: Yee Haw[link to www.ess.washington.edu] hiding the data??? [link to www.ess.washington.edu] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154424 United States 01/31/2011 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BFD happens now and again with the old girl. I'm sure you flatlanders and city dwellers find it very exciting but its just normal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1246107 |