Game Theory - Elite Style (IDEAS WELCOME!) | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1264526 United States 03/03/2011 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I came the following conclusions: 1. I would need to save any "elite" and their loved ones who has knowledge of the catastrophe. They would be first on the list. 2. I would try to save a set of people with the full diversity of expert skills. The best surgeons, farmers, etc. People who can rebuild. This would also include a security team and police. 3. I would need to save the young and strong, as they would have the best probability of surviving and the best chance of reproduction. 4. I would need to save a higher percentage of women to maximize reproduction. 5. I would need to store as much knowledge and tech as I could, along with more than sufficient food and other goods. And most importantly, I would need to hide everything from the general population. This is a tough call, but if you assume that 99% of people are going to die in a best-case scenario, you have to keep them in the dark, so as not to risk their panic destroying the whole enterprise. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1264526 United States 03/03/2011 06:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1278422 Netherlands 03/03/2011 06:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
G User ID: 1161006 United States 03/03/2011 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 830513 Australia 03/03/2011 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1261057 United States 03/03/2011 07:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Doctors of various sorts, engineers, various scientists for physics, geophysics, astronomy, biology, virology, technicians for labs and wiring, animal husbanders, farmers, energy techs and engineers, plumbers, construction workers,communications engineers and operators, teachers, also mothers and future breeders- I agree those would make rebuilding civilization much easier. But wait what about all those people that have a large skill set in a variety of areas, what about people with excellent recall and highly adaptive intelligence who score higher on intelligence tests because of that type of intelligence it takes to be innovative? What about the people who can think well under pressure. Where do you draw the line? Some people are naturally meant to be very good mothers- no other skill. Some are savants who can recite any page of the encyclopedia. Some people recycle everything. How do you choose? Do you want vicious savages, Do you want civilization to repeat by interbreeding the same stock that got us here? To get to this point in advancement only to start over with a smaller gene pool of inbreds to be our most select because of what... money? A lot of people have forewarning and all the traits necessary to make a strong, well rounded civilization. I say let the elite live with less luxury and save more of the unrecognized yet deserving people. The thinkers, the adaptives, the ones with ideas, out of the box people will find resources to rebuild where others fail. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 859194 United States 03/03/2011 09:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |