Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,062 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 991,172
Pageviews Today: 1,327,137Threads Today: 326Posts Today: 5,201
10:54 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

6 6 13....... looking for insite

 
Sammie
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1256469
United States
03/16/2011 03:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
6 6 13....... looking for insite
I woke up from a nap this evening and in my semi-dream/semi-awake state I heard the words six six one three

Anyone have any clues?

Probably nothing but I was just curious if anyone had any thoughts.

Cant recall what I was dreaming about prior to the words
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow".  ~Aesop


"Once in a dream I saw a snake swallowing its own tail, it swallowed and swallowed until it got halfway round, and there it stopped and there it stayed, it was stuffed with its own self. Some fix, that.
We only have ourselves to go on, and it’s enough…" -Charles Bukowski



"Grasping at things can only yield one of two results:
Either the thing you are grasping at disappears, or you yourself disappear.
It is only a matter of which occurs first."
-Goenka
Jonathan97202
User ID: 931875
United States
03/16/2011 04:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
I woke up from a nap this evening and in my semi-dream/semi-awake state I heard the words six six one three

Anyone have any clues?

Probably nothing but I was just curious if anyone had any thoughts.

Cant recall what I was dreaming about prior to the words
 Quoting: Sammie


do those numbers mean anything to you?

the voice was it in your head
in your ear
both ears

etc
Sammie  (OP)

User ID: 1256469
United States
03/16/2011 04:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
no meaning that i can think of. I've always been terrible with riddles.

the voice was in my head...my mind heard it, not my ears (if that makes sense)
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow".  ~Aesop


"Once in a dream I saw a snake swallowing its own tail, it swallowed and swallowed until it got halfway round, and there it stopped and there it stayed, it was stuffed with its own self. Some fix, that.
We only have ourselves to go on, and it’s enough…" -Charles Bukowski



"Grasping at things can only yield one of two results:
Either the thing you are grasping at disappears, or you yourself disappear.
It is only a matter of which occurs first."
-Goenka
Ozicell

User ID: 1282573
Australia
03/16/2011 04:17 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
Could be refering to a gene

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

An acid

[link to pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

Or a cluster of stars called Messier 18

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon.
Ozicell

User ID: 1282573
Australia
03/16/2011 04:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
Part of a paper on Statistical properties of the cellular-automaton model for earthquakes

[link to pra.aps.org]
That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon.
Sammie  (OP)

User ID: 1256469
United States
03/16/2011 04:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
Could be refering to a gene

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

An acid

[link to pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

Or a cluster of stars called Messier 18

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: Ozicell



Thanks!! :D

Checking the links......
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow".  ~Aesop


"Once in a dream I saw a snake swallowing its own tail, it swallowed and swallowed until it got halfway round, and there it stopped and there it stayed, it was stuffed with its own self. Some fix, that.
We only have ourselves to go on, and it’s enough…" -Charles Bukowski



"Grasping at things can only yield one of two results:
Either the thing you are grasping at disappears, or you yourself disappear.
It is only a matter of which occurs first."
-Goenka
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1144326
United States
03/16/2011 04:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
6 6 13 -> F F M -> Female Female Male -> Menage A Trois
Jonathan97202
User ID: 931875
United States
03/16/2011 04:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
[link to tics.trends.com] 1364-6613/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0

The mind’s best trick:
how we experience conscious will
Daniel M. Wegner
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 1470 William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
We often consciously will our own actions. This
experience is so profound that it tempts us to
believe that our actions are caused by consciousness.
It could also be a trick, however – the mind’s
way of estimating its own apparent authorship by
drawing causal inferences about relationships
between thoughts and actions. Cognitive, social,
and neuropsychological studies of apparent mental
causation suggest that experiences of conscious
will frequently depart from actual causal processes
and so might not reflect direct perceptions of conscious
thought causing action.
Does consciousness cause action? Many people think that
even asking this question is absurd. How could consciousness
not cause what we do? Every few moments of every
day, we think about doing something and then do it. We
think of moving a finger and then do it, we think of going to
the store for milk and do it, we think of looking away from
this page – and then do it. It certainly doesn’t take a rocket
scientist to draw the obvious conclusion from a lifelong
accumulation of such examples: consciousness is an active
force, an engine of will.
The mind has been known to play tricks, though.
Could this be one? What if our minds keep showing us
the same set of appearances, leading to an impression
of conscious will again and again, but never revealing
to us how our actions are actually caused? One way
this could happen is if both the thought about action
and the action itself are caused by unperceived forces
of mind: you think of doing X and then do X – not
because conscious thinking causes doing, but because
other mental processes (that are not consciously
perceived) cause both the thinking and the doing.
Based on your conscious perceptions of your thoughts
and actions, it would be impossible to tell in any given
case whether your thought was causing your action, or
something else was causing both of them. Could it be
that the deep intuition we all have about the power of
our conscious will is the result of this ‘sleight of mind’?
Perhaps we experience conscious will when we infer
that our thought causes our action, although we can’t
really know that this is the causal path (see Fig. 1).
Anomalies of will
If conscious will were an illusory add-on to action, we could
begin to explain all the odd cases when action and
conscious will do not properly coincide.
Neuropsychology
We might understand, for example, Penfield’s classic
finding on movements induced through electrical stimulation
of the motor cortex [1]. Conscious patients were
prompted by stimulation of the exposed brain to produce
movements that were not simple reflexes and instead
appeared to be complex, multi-staged, and voluntary. Yet,
their common report of the experience was that they did
not ‘do’ the action, and instead felt that Penfield had
‘pulled it out’ of them. This observation only makes sense if
the experience of will is an addition to voluntary action,
not a cause of it.
The possibility that conscious will is an illusion
might also explain the finding that unperceived causes
of action can fail to influence the experience of will [2].
People in one study, for instance, were asked to choose
to move one or the other index finger whenever they
heard a click [3]. Transcranial magnetic stimulation
(TMS) was applied alternately to the left or right motor
cortex to influence the movement, and this influence
over which finger was moved was strong at short
response times. Respondents reported consciously willing
the movements during the TMS influence, although
showing a lack of insight into the alternative causal
mechanism producing their actions. Similar inferences
can be drawn from Gazzaniga’s observations of splitbrain
patients who are induced to perform an action
through communication to the right hemisphere when
the major verbal centers of the left hemisphere are
unaware of the action’s cause [4]. Such patients
confabulate ‘left brain interpretations’ of their intentions,
apparently to satisfy the general assumption
that their actions are consciously willed.
The celebrated experiments of Benjamin Libet
provide further evidence that conscious will can be
experienced that does not correspond to causation [5].
In spontaneous, intentional finger movement, Libet
found that a scalp-recorded brain readiness potential
(RP) preceded the movement (measured electromyographically)
by a minimum of ,550 ms. This finding
indicates only that some sort of brain activity reliably
precedes the onset of voluntary action. However,
participants were also asked to recall the position of
a clock at their initial awareness of intending to move
Corresponding author: Daniel M. Wegner ([email protected]). their finger, and this awareness followed the RP by
Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.7 No.2 February 2003 65
[link to tics.trends.com] 1364-6613/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0
Jonathan97202
User ID: 931875
United States
03/16/2011 04:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
when i type in 6613 dream voice I get this

The Twelve Tribes of Israel symbolize, and are also the ancestors of ; "Ancient Extraterrestrial Peoples" from the Constellations of our Zodiac. They are some of the ancestors of the people who constructed the Earth's Great Pyramids and the Sphinx. These peoples came to Earth thousands of years ago, their numbers were a chosen, 12,000 from each particular Solar System, Star System, or Galaxy. They came from:

Sagiitaruis is the sign mentioned with the numbers 6613
Jonathan97202
User ID: 931875
United States
03/16/2011 05:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 6 13....... looking for insite
and just for fun I bring you some doom

13x66

The Apocalypse


13:1: "The sand of the sea" = 1716 (13x132)
"The sea" = 1157 (13x89)
"A beast rise up out of the sea" = 1664 (13x128)
Greek "theer," a wild beast = 117 (13x9)
Verse 11, The whole verse = 6318 (13x486)
Greek "theerion," beast = 247 (13x19)
Greek "hallo theerion," another beast = 378 (9x42)
"He had two horns" = 1521 (13x13x9)
"And he had two horns like a lamb" = 2704 (13x13x16)
Verse 15, "The image of the beast" = 1482 (13x114)
Verse 18, "The mark of the beast" = 2483 (13x191)
"The number of the beast" (acc. with article) = 2607 (13x159)
17:1: "The great whore" = 403 (13x31)
Verse 5, "The mother of harlots" = 2756 (13x212)
"Mystery, Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and abominations" = 8138 (13x626)
19:20: "The beast...and with him the false prophet who doeth wonders before him" = 8489 (13x653)
"The harlot, the beast, and the false prophet" = 3510 (13x270). The false Trinity is marked by 3x3x3x10x13.
The whole verse = 25441 (13x1957)
22:15: "Dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whatsoever loveth and maketh a lie" = 8710 (13x670)
8:10: "A great star" = 858 (13x66)
8:11: "Wormwood" = 1040 (13x80)
20:8: "Gog" = 806 (13x62) (Greek)
"Magog" = 52 (13x4)





GLP