6 6 13....... looking for insite | |
Jonathan97202 User ID: 931875 United States 03/16/2011 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I woke up from a nap this evening and in my semi-dream/semi-awake state I heard the words six six one three Quoting: SammieAnyone have any clues? Probably nothing but I was just curious if anyone had any thoughts. Cant recall what I was dreaming about prior to the words do those numbers mean anything to you? the voice was it in your head in your ear both ears etc |
Sammie
(OP) User ID: 1256469 United States 03/16/2011 04:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | no meaning that i can think of. I've always been terrible with riddles. the voice was in my head...my mind heard it, not my ears (if that makes sense) "Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow". ~Aesop "Once in a dream I saw a snake swallowing its own tail, it swallowed and swallowed until it got halfway round, and there it stopped and there it stayed, it was stuffed with its own self. Some fix, that. We only have ourselves to go on, and it’s enough…" -Charles Bukowski "Grasping at things can only yield one of two results: Either the thing you are grasping at disappears, or you yourself disappear. It is only a matter of which occurs first." -Goenka |
Ozicell
User ID: 1282573 Australia 03/16/2011 04:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] An acid [link to pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] Or a cluster of stars called Messier 18 [link to en.wikipedia.org] That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Ozicell
User ID: 1282573 Australia 03/16/2011 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Part of a paper on Statistical properties of the cellular-automaton model for earthquakes [link to pra.aps.org] That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Sammie
(OP) User ID: 1256469 United States 03/16/2011 04:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Could be refering to a gene Quoting: Ozicell[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] An acid [link to pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] Or a cluster of stars called Messier 18 [link to en.wikipedia.org] Thanks!! :D Checking the links...... "Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow". ~Aesop "Once in a dream I saw a snake swallowing its own tail, it swallowed and swallowed until it got halfway round, and there it stopped and there it stayed, it was stuffed with its own self. Some fix, that. We only have ourselves to go on, and it’s enough…" -Charles Bukowski "Grasping at things can only yield one of two results: Either the thing you are grasping at disappears, or you yourself disappear. It is only a matter of which occurs first." -Goenka |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144326 United States 03/16/2011 04:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jonathan97202 User ID: 931875 United States 03/16/2011 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to tics.trends.com] 1364-6613/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0 The mind’s best trick: how we experience conscious will Daniel M. Wegner Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 1470 William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA We often consciously will our own actions. This experience is so profound that it tempts us to believe that our actions are caused by consciousness. It could also be a trick, however – the mind’s way of estimating its own apparent authorship by drawing causal inferences about relationships between thoughts and actions. Cognitive, social, and neuropsychological studies of apparent mental causation suggest that experiences of conscious will frequently depart from actual causal processes and so might not reflect direct perceptions of conscious thought causing action. Does consciousness cause action? Many people think that even asking this question is absurd. How could consciousness not cause what we do? Every few moments of every day, we think about doing something and then do it. We think of moving a finger and then do it, we think of going to the store for milk and do it, we think of looking away from this page – and then do it. It certainly doesn’t take a rocket scientist to draw the obvious conclusion from a lifelong accumulation of such examples: consciousness is an active force, an engine of will. The mind has been known to play tricks, though. Could this be one? What if our minds keep showing us the same set of appearances, leading to an impression of conscious will again and again, but never revealing to us how our actions are actually caused? One way this could happen is if both the thought about action and the action itself are caused by unperceived forces of mind: you think of doing X and then do X – not because conscious thinking causes doing, but because other mental processes (that are not consciously perceived) cause both the thinking and the doing. Based on your conscious perceptions of your thoughts and actions, it would be impossible to tell in any given case whether your thought was causing your action, or something else was causing both of them. Could it be that the deep intuition we all have about the power of our conscious will is the result of this ‘sleight of mind’? Perhaps we experience conscious will when we infer that our thought causes our action, although we can’t really know that this is the causal path (see Fig. 1). Anomalies of will If conscious will were an illusory add-on to action, we could begin to explain all the odd cases when action and conscious will do not properly coincide. Neuropsychology We might understand, for example, Penfield’s classic finding on movements induced through electrical stimulation of the motor cortex [1]. Conscious patients were prompted by stimulation of the exposed brain to produce movements that were not simple reflexes and instead appeared to be complex, multi-staged, and voluntary. Yet, their common report of the experience was that they did not ‘do’ the action, and instead felt that Penfield had ‘pulled it out’ of them. This observation only makes sense if the experience of will is an addition to voluntary action, not a cause of it. The possibility that conscious will is an illusion might also explain the finding that unperceived causes of action can fail to influence the experience of will [2]. People in one study, for instance, were asked to choose to move one or the other index finger whenever they heard a click [3]. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied alternately to the left or right motor cortex to influence the movement, and this influence over which finger was moved was strong at short response times. Respondents reported consciously willing the movements during the TMS influence, although showing a lack of insight into the alternative causal mechanism producing their actions. Similar inferences can be drawn from Gazzaniga’s observations of splitbrain patients who are induced to perform an action through communication to the right hemisphere when the major verbal centers of the left hemisphere are unaware of the action’s cause [4]. Such patients confabulate ‘left brain interpretations’ of their intentions, apparently to satisfy the general assumption that their actions are consciously willed. The celebrated experiments of Benjamin Libet provide further evidence that conscious will can be experienced that does not correspond to causation [5]. In spontaneous, intentional finger movement, Libet found that a scalp-recorded brain readiness potential (RP) preceded the movement (measured electromyographically) by a minimum of ,550 ms. This finding indicates only that some sort of brain activity reliably precedes the onset of voluntary action. However, participants were also asked to recall the position of a clock at their initial awareness of intending to move Corresponding author: Daniel M. Wegner ([email protected]). their finger, and this awareness followed the RP by Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.7 No.2 February 2003 65 [link to tics.trends.com] 1364-6613/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0 |
Jonathan97202 User ID: 931875 United States 03/16/2011 04:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | when i type in 6613 dream voice I get this The Twelve Tribes of Israel symbolize, and are also the ancestors of ; "Ancient Extraterrestrial Peoples" from the Constellations of our Zodiac. They are some of the ancestors of the people who constructed the Earth's Great Pyramids and the Sphinx. These peoples came to Earth thousands of years ago, their numbers were a chosen, 12,000 from each particular Solar System, Star System, or Galaxy. They came from: Sagiitaruis is the sign mentioned with the numbers 6613 |
Jonathan97202 User ID: 931875 United States 03/16/2011 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 13x66 The Apocalypse 13:1: "The sand of the sea" = 1716 (13x132) "The sea" = 1157 (13x89) "A beast rise up out of the sea" = 1664 (13x128) Greek "theer," a wild beast = 117 (13x9) Verse 11, The whole verse = 6318 (13x486) Greek "theerion," beast = 247 (13x19) Greek "hallo theerion," another beast = 378 (9x42) "He had two horns" = 1521 (13x13x9) "And he had two horns like a lamb" = 2704 (13x13x16) Verse 15, "The image of the beast" = 1482 (13x114) Verse 18, "The mark of the beast" = 2483 (13x191) "The number of the beast" (acc. with article) = 2607 (13x159) 17:1: "The great whore" = 403 (13x31) Verse 5, "The mother of harlots" = 2756 (13x212) "Mystery, Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and abominations" = 8138 (13x626) 19:20: "The beast...and with him the false prophet who doeth wonders before him" = 8489 (13x653) "The harlot, the beast, and the false prophet" = 3510 (13x270). The false Trinity is marked by 3x3x3x10x13. The whole verse = 25441 (13x1957) 22:15: "Dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whatsoever loveth and maketh a lie" = 8710 (13x670) 8:10: "A great star" = 858 (13x66) 8:11: "Wormwood" = 1040 (13x80) 20:8: "Gog" = 806 (13x62) (Greek) "Magog" = 52 (13x4) |