If God doesn't exist,; then why.......

Case closed. You can't refute the stupidity of science and its adherents. You're virtually religious about it.

Then why are SOME "Loving"......and some aren't? What are those connected to, that makes them Loving??

No, there is nothing "god" to begin with, all kinds of "gods" are by definition made-up entities that do not exist in real life.

Every time I see a butterfly I know that Magical Ancient Aliens created the world, because without Magical Ancient Aliens how could there be anything so beautiful as butterflies and the sky?

Obvious troll is obvious.

Let me put up this sign of "Do not feed the troll".

And again, morals are not connected to God OR emotions.

Take Charles Manson for instance. Killing people made him feel good. It made his brain produce the same chemicals produced when Mother Theresa helped the poor.

well i am going to feed you...poor thing...

Yes, but would we even have Science, if we hadn't first been Created? Did Science Create us.........or has Science simply not gotten around to defining the real Truth about what God is yet?

___________________________________________
Ok. Prove me wrong.

Magical Smurfs created the Earth 650 years ago.

I know this because Papa Smurf himself whispered magical knowledge to me in my sleep.

Everyone who does not believe me are going to be sent by Papa Smurf to the evil Gargamel to be eaten.

Papa Smurf speaks to me and I can hear his thoughts.

_________________________________________


You can't prove me wrong, nor can I prove that God doesn't exist.

But you can't say, through the development of knowledge throughout the years, that all science is wrong because one theory was proven wrong. Humans are getting more and more knowledge of the universe and, of course, the person that is looking at the universe is going to have less knowledge available to them hundreds of years ago.


Sometimes I wish I did have a child-like mentality that simple "magic" created everything...and still be content with never even questioning it.

Do you believe that Intelligence is equal in all of us.......or are some more Intelligence than others? So why can't there be a Supreme Intelligence???


I don't believe that is the issue......for each of us ARE individuals! imho

Science explains why people need to make up a god figure. Science explains what is real; it does not explain imaginary things.

Science explains.

We are not "made", we are evolved, over the eons, slowly and gradually, into existence. Manifested. Not "made" or "assembled" or "appear from thin air" or "intellectally designed" or "designed" at all. We are simply a smarter kind of monkeys, that is all.

I agree! "Good & bad" are really just perceptions......

Well that could be True......with the exception of the ONE that is! lol

You're not even making any fucking sense.

Maybe you are right, and everything just IS.........that NOTHING created nothing! But I don't think so.......?

Not created. Manifested.

But look at it from a different perspective: If "emotions" are "Energy in Motion".........then couldn't Mr. Manson's energy been coming from a counter source, than that of God's?

I'm not saying that WE haven't evolved: But couldn't God have had a hand in OUR evolution?

Sorry.......I was trying to say that: There can be as many misperceptions as there are humans......but only ONE Truth!

bump.

Nope, god doesn't exist, anywhere, in our universe, outside our universe, no. Physical laws do not permits so and if there was anything "abnormal" happened we would have detected it.

There is no "intellect" other than, ourselves, animals, and aliens (if there is any).

There is no "intellect" involved in the shaping of our universe, or what is outside it. Simple rules, automated infinity. Physics.

Interesting choice of wording! Manifested......not Created.....ok........I can see that too!

But that which is "manifested" is projected from somewhere, isn't it? The guitar makes no sound, until the string is plucked! (?)

Yup. As is language.

Side Note - You guys should read Derrida. He was mostly a linguist but his ideas can be applied to the God debacle.

He says there is the signifier and the signified, or the word "tree" and what you think when you hear "tree." A tree is a tree because a tree is not a mouse. Basically he is saying all things are in reference to another.

In the case of good and bad, there is no absolute perfect good or bad. You can only say something is good because you compare it to past experiences, and it that good thing is good because it is better than what came before.

Basically, words are like reality cookie cutters. You can name anything - cut the cookie into any shape you want - but it is still a cookie and it still came from something not a cookie.

Even simpler - reality is a gigantic thesaurus, or a search on wikipedia. You look something up, learn about, then you are referred to something else. Where did the tree come from? A seed? Where did the seed come from? Before you know it you are at the big bang and left with something, for all intents and purposes, unnameable; the beginning, or as Derrida would say, the "transcendental signified," or the thing from which all differences are made.

But alas, linguistics and theology do have paths that will never cross.

spoken like a true tool.

Well, you failed to say that, because what you have said means "there might be many gods that are made up but there is only one real god". Please learn to use better languagles because you have totally conveyed a different meaning.

It has everything to do with God, we were instilled to have those feelings. Most people naturally do because that is how they were created.

Lazy troll is too lazy.

Warning sign "Do not feed the troll."

yea...

Not because of "how they were created" but because of their lack of education and their exposure to the cancerous bible or similar things.

I feel the OP. Why is good, GOOD and bad is BAD, as in what determined what's of good and what's of bad.

like, why is bad to talk loud or give a good ol "woot" every now and then in public libraries but ok in public parks? sure you may be desturbing other readers but why is it determined bad if dogs can bark at all times of the night when I'm trying to damn sleep?!?! --- ok those are some bad examples

maybe this:

Some species kill and eat others and their own for food and nourishment and crap. Why is it bad if a human does? ( please do not mistake this as a desire to do so!!! - just giving an example!!! ) but when other animals or species does it, it's the circle of life, or nature or whatever. What makes humans different, because we are intelligent? we will condom killing each other for the purpose of JUSTICE and crap....soooo... why don't other species feel as we do when they kill?

arent we all product of nature? we got the killing each other part down packed, just got a bunch of rules to it.

i think this might be a better one.

what if a poor chinese kid in the slums of some poor Chinese village who havent ate in days, stole one of donald trumps fries when he was looking as he was touring where to build a casino - AFTER HE ALREADY ASKED FOR ONE. that kid would get punished. hes hungry, needs a damn french fry, donald trump is dumb rich with a whole super-sized carton full of them and by law in pretty much every country that kid is WRONG. why?

0.o