>>>>> 290 Million Years Old Human Footprints !!! <<<<<<

wow cool

Sweet, I knew backwards timetravel was possible!

Human race is much older than scientists were willing to admit !!!

Really? You have any evidence to back that up? Backwards time travel is just as plausible an explanation as Protoman and Ribwoman.

It goes back even further than that!!

Two Billion years old Grooved Spheres from South Africa

The oldest artifacts go back about 2 billion years. These are round metallic objects (below) that have been found over the past couple of decades by miners in South Africa. The objects come from a mine near a place called Ottosdalin, in the West Transvaal region.

The objects are one or two inches in diameter. The ones we had analyzed by metallurgists turned out to be made of an iron ore called hematite. The most interesting feature of the objects is the parallel grooves that go around the center of each one. Some have four grooves, some three, some two, some only one. The metallurgists who examined them said they were not produced naturally.

Therefore, the objects must have been manufactured by someone with humanlike intelligence. Yet they are found solidly embedded in mineral deposits over 2 billion years old. Human Devolution Joan d'Arc Interviews Michael Cremo

[link to www.mcremo.com]


Nuclear Reactors Nearly Two Billion Years Old


The remnants of nuclear reactors nearly two billion years old were found in the 1970s in Africa. These reactors are thought to have occurred naturally. No natural reactors exist today, since the relative density of fissile uranium has now decayed below that needed for a sustainable reaction. Pictured above is Fossil Reactor 15, located in Oklo, Gabon.

Uranium oxide remains are visible as the yellowish rock. Oklo by-products are being used today to study the stability of the fundamental constants over cosmological time-scales and to develop more effective means for disposing of human-manufactured nuclear waste.

In 1972, a French company imported some uranium ore from Oklo in the Gabon Republic in Africa. Surprisingly the uranium concentration in the ore was as low as spent uranium fuel from a nuclear reactor.

The finding led scientists to believe that the uranium had already been used for energy production. This discovery shocked the world and attracted scientists from many countries to go to Oklo for further investigation.

The results showed that the uranium mine was an ancient nuclear reactor. The ancient reactor consisted of five hundred tons of utilized uranium ore in six different areas. Its output power was estimated to be approximately one hundred kilowatts.

The reactor was perfectly preserved and its layout was very rational. It is estimated that the reactor had been in operation for around 500,000 years. Furthermore, nuclear wastes produced in this reactor had not spread all over the surrounding areas. Instead, they were confined within the separate sections. From the perspective of modern nuclear technology, this ancient reactor used very advanced techniques.

Thread: Nuclear Reactors Nearly Two Billion Years Old!!

600 million years old:

On July 20th, Meister returned to Antelope Springs with professional geologist Dr. Clifford Burdick. Digging in the same locality, Burdick discovered another imprint in the Cambrian shale, this time of a child The print was 6 inches long, and the five toes were barely distinguishable, as if the child was wearing moccasins.

Yet Burdick detected that the toes were spread out, indicating the child had only begun to wear shoes, which tend to compress the toes with age. The heel and arch were again well depressed, showing weight distribution, and a segment of a fossil was crushed in its middle. Burdick managed to find a larger fossil imprint, like Meister's original, though the impression was shallower, and also unearthed a second child's track, smaller than the first, with the toes broken off, but perfect in its other aspects. Later, a detailed examination revealed that the rock in which the prints were found was made of tiny layers, and where the foot-marks occur, the layers were bowed downward from the horizontal - demonstrating that weight had indeed, been pressed into the once prehistoric mud. But that "prehistoric mud" with its tell-tale prints, is now Cambrian shale - an astounding 600 million years old. And the fossils in the prints are trilobites - supposed to be among the earliest forms of life on earth.

This time, we have literally hit "rock bottom" in the fossil record - and yet here we find the presence of man, and an intelligent, shoe-wearing man at that. How could he have "evolved" from simple life, when the Cambrian prints testify that he is as old as life itself? (Strange Relics from the Depths of the Earth by J.R. Jochmans, Litt.D., 1979)


___________

If it expects or demands worship, it is not divine!!

Actually I have.

[link to humansarefree.com]

But I also have for your theory :

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

"While it is commendable that MacDonald and the Smithsonian clearly acknowledge the existence of these tracks in a strata that contradicts the current evolutionary theory, it is noteworthy that they highlight only the mammal and bird prints, and don't mention the human footprint found with them."

Wait a minute, that's just stupid. How come they will just ignore that? This must be some sort of hoax.

We, as medical scientists need to do DNA sampling of the prints before we can allow it to be recorded into books etc.. so far, this find has zero meaning. We should all stop commenting on this thread because it lacks any evidence.

You have to read article about John Titor

[link to johntitor.com]

Only by using circular reasoning can you get to date something that far back, therefore
MASSIVE FAIL!

What is this ??? I want to publish an article from abovetopsecret.com and I get this notice from pages GLP:

*** Because Above Top Secret staff are a bunch of uptight control freaks, we do not allow content from their website to be posted or linked on Godlikeproductions.com *** Hey at least I didn't ban you and change the link to assholes ;)

We dont have enough into to make that call.
Which is why the "there is silence", reality is not like GLP where you just make statements based off bullshit.

What is wrong with you?
Why would you link him to obvious hoax bullshit that has already been shown to be 100% bullshit.

Dont you want to link him to the rapture that happened a few weeks ago too?

War on GLP !!!

Whats really funny is the flipflopping on the banning.
I guess now that the numbers have been really fucked up they are trying to take it easy again until the next bipolar freakout.

How do you do DNA sampling on a footprint?

OMG....... How are you doing? It's been a Long time.

The footprint seems fake, cartoonish almost, its too perfect, no sign of movement, no slipping or sliding that you would have with any creature walking through mud....i think this is a bibletard hoax to try and justify the fairy story....epic fail....

Look at me, I'm Idol Harobed. Meh.

Huh?....DNA sampling on a 290 million year footprint? even if it was done last week i doubt you could get any sample of DNA, yeah, that sounds really scientific.....

Welll would the claimed age of the print not also fuck up their fairy tale?

They did not state the footprint was 6000 years old..

Hi Hon I'm great, how are you? Been a while, I know.

Good to see you again.

Look dude she is clearly a "medical scientist" she has a yacht and a mansion, she knows what she is talking about.

Dont you watch the crime shows?

Yeah your right.....wasnt thinking straight...i was thinking of the claim by them that the Dino's were around at the same time as man (ie 6000 yrs ago)

Uh, I was looking at some of your other posts from yesterday and today, and either you are just goofing around after you moved to Africa or you are impersonating Deborah.

If whoever is posting under this name "Beradoh Odil" with Deborahs old picture is a truthful person..... Then which is it?

I pretty sure I already know the answer.

Last Edited by scimitar on 06/11/2011 03:00 PM

Banned in 4.....3.....2.....

there were humans here since the dinosaurs, from other planets. there has been a lot of colonization.

Insert outlandish claim stated as a fact.

how do we know it wasn't just dinosaurs born with human feet?