Will the real Jesus please stand up? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1557119 Australia 09/19/2011 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The real Jesus has moved on... into the new age. He is living too and evolving. Time to grow up kids. Quoting: Aunty Flo I totally disagree with you. New age is from the devil, himself. Anything you need to know, about just who Jesus was/is, is written in the Holy Bible. Peace You are entitled to your opinion. I see an evolved progressive Jesus, who doesn't even go by that name anymore. You see the biblical Jesus. It's all good. Though the new testament is only relevant to the age of Pisces. There are many signs showing we are moving into the new age, the age of Aquarius. I don't believe in the devil. |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Earlier I quoted a web author named Jeffery Jay Lowder from a website called infidels.org. Okay, as silly as this sounds, I need some instruction on how to post links. I can't do it on my tablet, and I can only assume that I can on this laptop. Anyway, getting back to Lowder...He quotes in the same article I referenced earlier a so called pagan author named Pliny the Younger. Lowder concludes that Pliny did not offer independent evidence of the historicity of Jesus. In other words, Pliny was not an eye witness to Jesus, nor did he refer to any non-Christian writing in his own writing. There was no reference to Pliny's writings being suspect in any way. I am going to quote part of Pliny's narrative which would have been written in 111 or 112 AD (according to Lowder): The early parts of the passage are about his inexperience in punishing Christians and his musings about how to appropriately to punish them (including death). Eventually he says: "They affirmed, however, the whole of their guilt, or their error, was, that they were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternative voices a hym to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft, or adultery..." In the last part of the above paragraph Pliny says, "but I could discover nothing more than depraved and excessive superstition." This sort of comment would be expected from a nonbeliever. BUT... What does Pliny's observation of these early Christians suggest that they believed about Jesus? I submit that when Pliny said they were singing as "to a god" that he was witnessing Christian belief in the deity of Jesus. Not being a monotheist himself, Pliny would never have said the people sang to Jesus as God. His best description of deity worship (according to his world view) would necessarily refer to Jesus as a god. I discuss this here because I have had it up to my eyeballs with people saying that some church or council decided that Jesus is God, and that these are the main reasons people today believe that Jesus is God. Most people who have said this are not completely aware of what was going on in Nicea in 325 AD. I'll get this in while since I can be overly academic, and there may be other things people want to discuss. In the meantime, does anybody out there really think anyone on this forum would believe something because of a council vote? We are all smarter than that..... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1557119 Australia 09/19/2011 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Earlier I quoted a web author named Jeffery Jay Lowder from a website called infidels.org. Okay, as silly as this sounds, I need some instruction on how to post links. I can't do it on my tablet, and I can only assume that I can on this laptop. Quoting: Jenann Anyway, getting back to Lowder...He quotes in the same article I referenced earlier a so called pagan author named Pliny the Younger. Lowder concludes that Pliny did not offer independent evidence of the historicity of Jesus. In other words, Pliny was not an eye witness to Jesus, nor did he refer to any non-Christian writing in his own writing. There was no reference to Pliny's writings being suspect in any way. I am going to quote part of Pliny's narrative which would have been written in 111 or 112 AD (according to Lowder): The early parts of the passage are about his inexperience in punishing Christians and his musings about how to appropriately to punish them (including death). Eventually he says: "They affirmed, however, the whole of their guilt, or their error, was, that they were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternative voices a hym to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft, or adultery..." In the last part of the above paragraph Pliny says, "but I could discover nothing more than depraved and excessive superstition." This sort of comment would be expected from a nonbeliever. BUT... What does Pliny's observation of these early Christians suggest that they believed about Jesus? I submit that when Pliny said they were singing as "to a god" that he was witnessing Christian belief in the deity of Jesus. Not being a monotheist himself, Pliny would never have said the people sang to Jesus as God. His best description of deity worship (according to his world view) would necessarily refer to Jesus as a god. I discuss this here because I have had it up to my eyeballs with people saying that some church or council decided that Jesus is God, and that these are the main reasons people today believe that Jesus is God. Most people who have said this are not completely aware of what was going on in Nicea in 325 AD. I'll get this in while since I can be overly academic, and there may be other things people want to discuss. In the meantime, does anybody out there really think anyone on this forum would believe something because of a council vote? We are all smarter than that..... It's very hard to apply logic and reason to something that is paranormal. And I believe that is the way it is intended. |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi Jen, Quoting: Troubled Waters... It looks like your thread is really moving. Jesus was fully God, and fully man, when He walked this earth. Shalom! Hi TW, I am so glad you are here. There is simply too much to cover for one OP. And I'm having a little battle with this laptop. I thought for once it would ne nice to be able to post a link, but I still haven't figured out how to do it. And, I tried to use the underline function, but I can't get it to work. Before this evening is over I might have to trim my nails...lol! Typing on the virtual keyboard that is on my tablet is a heck of a lot easier than this. I will look forward to your comments! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1557119 Australia 09/19/2011 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Earlier I quoted a web author named Jeffery Jay Lowder from a website called infidels.org. Okay, as silly as this sounds, I need some instruction on how to post links. I can't do it on my tablet, and I can only assume that I can on this laptop. Quoting: Jenann Anyway, getting back to Lowder...He quotes in the same article I referenced earlier a so called pagan author named Pliny the Younger. Lowder concludes that Pliny did not offer independent evidence of the historicity of Jesus. In other words, Pliny was not an eye witness to Jesus, nor did he refer to any non-Christian writing in his own writing. There was no reference to Pliny's writings being suspect in any way. I am going to quote part of Pliny's narrative which would have been written in 111 or 112 AD (according to Lowder): The early parts of the passage are about his inexperience in punishing Christians and his musings about how to appropriately to punish them (including death). Eventually he says: "They affirmed, however, the whole of their guilt, or their error, was, that they were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternative voices a hym to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft, or adultery..." In the last part of the above paragraph Pliny says, "but I could discover nothing more than depraved and excessive superstition." This sort of comment would be expected from a nonbeliever. BUT... What does Pliny's observation of these early Christians suggest that they believed about Jesus? I submit that when Pliny said they were singing as "to a god" that he was witnessing Christian belief in the deity of Jesus. Not being a monotheist himself, Pliny would never have said the people sang to Jesus as God. His best description of deity worship (according to his world view) would necessarily refer to Jesus as a god. I discuss this here because I have had it up to my eyeballs with people saying that some church or council decided that Jesus is God, and that these are the main reasons people today believe that Jesus is God. Most people who have said this are not completely aware of what was going on in Nicea in 325 AD. I'll get this in while since I can be overly academic, and there may be other things people want to discuss. In the meantime, does anybody out there really think anyone on this forum would believe something because of a council vote? We are all smarter than that..... It's very hard to apply logic and reason to something that is paranormal. And I believe that is the way it is intended. What I mean is that it is there is a great deal of faith that is required. |
Life and Love
User ID: 1525154 United States 09/19/2011 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's very hard to apply logic and reason to something that is paranormal. And I believe that is the way it is intended. Quoting: Aunty Flo I will agree to disagree with your details (above), but I definitely agree with this statement. It's a "domain mismatch" to apply logic, reason, and analysis to spiritual things. Sort of like asking what's the least common denominator of the square root of two. We become like that to which we are devoted. - Choose wisely. |
you smell User ID: 1412160 United States 09/19/2011 09:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for everyone who has replied so far. I will eventually get back to you...having laptop trouble. I also want to start this thread in a particular way, so stay tuned. Quoting: Jenann Now, regarding other related topics: If enough people show an interest in other related topics, perhaps we will address them later in this thread or maybe even in a new thread. For now, we will have to get into the historicity of Jesus and the reliability of the Bible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1331138 United States 09/19/2011 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Life and Love
User ID: 1525154 United States 09/19/2011 09:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | shut the fuck up,who made you our teacher?this is as weak as i have seen it here on glp...i guess all of you will have to be subservient to our wonderful teacher,better listen..things may change,and youll want to stay tuned..yeccchhhh... Quoting: you smell 1412160 Talk about mixed up... where do I begin... I always wonder why some people get so aroused by mere pixels on a computer screen. We become like that to which we are devoted. - Choose wisely. |
Xisuthros Rex
User ID: 908143 United States 09/19/2011 09:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 09:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The real Jesus has moved on... into the new age. He is living too and evolving. Time to grow up kids. Quoting: Aunty Flo Let us know if you want to discuss this further. Some posters leave one comment and never return, so if you have something to add we'll be here. It's what I know to be true. I communicate with angels, which I have mentioned on here many times. And the time is definately now, as in we are in the end times, heading into the new age. It's going to be more wonderful then anyone could even imagine. Hi Aunty, You and anyone else can call me Jen. When you say new age are you only referring to the time period after the time of the end, or does it include a particular belief system too? I would also be curious to know what you mean when you state that Jesus has evolved. Last Edited by Jenann on 09/19/2011 09:30 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1331138 United States 09/19/2011 09:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi Jen, Quoting: Troubled Waters... It looks like your thread is really moving. Jesus was fully God, and fully man, when He walked this earth. Shalom! Hi TW, I am so glad you are here. There is simply too much to cover for one OP. And I'm having a little battle with this laptop. I thought for once it would ne nice to be able to post a link, but I still haven't figured out how to do it. And, I tried to use the underline function, but I can't get it to work. Before this evening is over I might have to trim my nails...lol! Typing on the virtual keyboard that is on my tablet is a heck of a lot easier than this. I will look forward to your comments! Jen, you're to funny! Just don't pull out your hair lol |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The real Jesus has moved on... into the new age. He is living too and evolving. Time to grow up kids. Quoting: Aunty Flo Let us know if you want to discuss this further. Some posters leave one comment and never return, so if you have something to add we'll be here. It's what I know to be true. I communicate with angels, which I have mentioned on here many times. And the time is definately now, as in we are in the end times, heading into the new age. It's going to be more wonderful then anyone could even imagine. Hi Aunty, You and anyone else can call me Jen. When you say new age are you only referring to the time period after the time of the end, or does it include a particular belief system too? I would also be curious to know what you mean when you state that Jesus has evolved. I forgot to mention that I only joined GLP over the summer, so I have missed your posts about angels. I have caught a couple of hilarious one liners you've posted on threads that have nothing to do with the things we are discussing tonight. You have provided some much needed comic relief in the midst of all the doom talk. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1557119 Australia 09/19/2011 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The real Jesus has moved on... into the new age. He is living too and evolving. Time to grow up kids. Quoting: Aunty Flo Let us know if you want to discuss this further. Some posters leave one comment and never return, so if you have something to add we'll be here. It's what I know to be true. I communicate with angels, which I have mentioned on here many times. And the time is definately now, as in we are in the end times, heading into the new age. It's going to be more wonderful then anyone could even imagine. Hi Aunty, You and anyone else can call me Jen. When you say new age are you only referring to the time period after the time of the end, or does it include a particular belief system too? I would also be curious to know what you mean when Jesus has evolved. Hi Jen, nice to meet you . When I say new age, I mean heading form the age of Pisces to the age of Aquarius. I also mean that all the prophecy in the bible is fulfilled. It means we are moving forward into a new golden age where there will be a marriage between heaven and earth. Man and angel will walk together as one. The bible will be as relevant to the age of Aquarius, as the old testament is relevant to this time period. I know there is going to be a fairytale ending for everyone, and we are on the cusp. |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi Jen, Quoting: Troubled Waters... It looks like your thread is really moving. Jesus was fully God, and fully man, when He walked this earth. Shalom! Hi TW, I am so glad you are here. There is simply too much to cover for one OP. And I'm having a little battle with this laptop. I thought for once it would ne nice to be able to post a link, but I still haven't figured out how to do it. And, I tried to use the underline function, but I can't get it to work. Before this evening is over I might have to trim my nails...lol! Typing on the virtual keyboard that is on my tablet is a heck of a lot easier than this. I will look forward to your comments! Jen, you're to funny! Just don't pull out your hair lol No...just the fingernails! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1557119 Australia 09/19/2011 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1465884 Let us know if you want to discuss this further. Some posters leave one comment and never return, so if you have something to add we'll be here. It's what I know to be true. I communicate with angels, which I have mentioned on here many times. And the time is definately now, as in we are in the end times, heading into the new age. It's going to be more wonderful then anyone could even imagine. Hi Aunty, You and anyone else can call me Jen. When you say new age are you only referring to the time period after the time of the end, or does it include a particular belief system too? I would also be curious to know what you mean when you state that Jesus has evolved. I forgot to mention that I only joined GLP over the summer, so I have missed your posts about angels. I have caught a couple of hilarious one liners you've posted on threads that have nothing to do with the things we are discussing tonight. You have provided some much needed comic relief in the midst of all the doom talk. LOL, thanks Jen. I don't really get involved in religious discussion all that much, I'm not really here to push my opinions on others because I'm not all that religious myself. Cheers. |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well that last post makes it look like TW said no...just the fingernails! It was me. Y'all would find it hard to believe that before kids I had a job that involved me being the go to person for computer problems in my department when all the official computer guys were unavailable |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1331138 United States 09/19/2011 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Earlier I quoted a web author named Jeffery Jay Lowder from a website called infidels.org. Okay, as silly as this sounds, I need some instruction on how to post links. I can't do it on my tablet, and I can only assume that I can on this laptop. Quoting: Jenann Anyway, getting back to Lowder...He quotes in the same article I referenced earlier a so called pagan author named Pliny the Younger. Lowder concludes that Pliny did not offer independent evidence of the historicity of Jesus. In other words, Pliny was not an eye witness to Jesus, nor did he refer to any non-Christian writing in his own writing. There was no reference to Pliny's writings being suspect in any way. I am going to quote part of Pliny's narrative which would have been written in 111 or 112 AD (according to Lowder): The early parts of the passage are about his inexperience in punishing Christians and his musings about how to appropriately to punish them (including death). Eventually he says: "They affirmed, however, the whole of their guilt, or their error, was, that they were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternative voices a hym to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft, or adultery..." In the last part of the above paragraph Pliny says, "but I could discover nothing more than depraved and excessive superstition." This sort of comment would be expected from a nonbeliever. BUT... What does Pliny's observation of these early Christians suggest that they believed about Jesus? I submit that when Pliny said they were singing as "to a god" that he was witnessing Christian belief in the deity of Jesus. Not being a monotheist himself, Pliny would never have said the people sang to Jesus as God. His best description of deity worship (according to his world view) would necessarily refer to Jesus as a god. I discuss this here because I have had it up to my eyeballs with people saying that some church or council decided that Jesus is God, and that these are the main reasons people today believe that Jesus is God. Most people who have said this are not completely aware of what was going on in Nicea in 325 AD. I'll get this in while since I can be overly academic, and there may be other things people want to discuss. In the meantime, does anybody out there really think anyone on this forum would believe something because of a council vote? We are all smarter than that..... It's very hard to apply logic and reason to something that is paranormal. And I believe that is the way it is intended. What I mean is that it is there is a great deal of faith that is required. AF- Do you believe that Jesus is the only way to the Father? Oh, and do you believe that Jesus is God? Thanks! |
Daniel's Seventieth Seven User ID: 1071051 United States 09/19/2011 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What does Pliny's observation of these early Christians suggest that they believed about Jesus? Quoting: Jenann Simple: They believed what He taught... ... never to commit any fraud, theft, or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust ... [link to www.allaboutthejourney.org] .) |
Apopheros
User ID: 633354 Canada 09/19/2011 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me tell you the truth about jesus v2. he is the antichrist, the incarnation of the Sun God Ra and he is the greatest alchemist of this world. he has supernatural power, he is canadian and he is the greatest ninja ever known to the ninja world, a living divine bomb. You can get acquainted with his mystical powers throught what he calls strange attractor arts. "The antichrist will know every art" more later |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1331138 United States 09/19/2011 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me tell you the truth about jesus v2. Quoting: Apopheros he is the antichrist, the incarnation of the Sun God Ra and he is the greatest alchemist of this world. he has supernatural power, he is canadian and he is the greatest ninja ever known to the ninja world, a living divine bomb. You can get acquainted with his mystical powers throught what he calls strange attractor arts. "The antichrist will know every art" more later |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Earlier I quoted a web author named Jeffery Jay Lowder from a website called infidels.org. Okay, as silly as this sounds, I need some instruction on how to post links. I can't do it on my tablet, and I can only assume that I can on this laptop. Quoting: Jenann Anyway, getting back to Lowder...He quotes in the same article I referenced earlier a so called pagan author named Pliny the Younger. Lowder concludes that Pliny did not offer independent evidence of the historicity of Jesus. In other words, Pliny was not an eye witness to Jesus, nor did he refer to any non-Christian writing in his own writing. There was no reference to Pliny's writings being suspect in any way. I am going to quote part of Pliny's narrative which would have been written in 111 or 112 AD (according to Lowder): The early parts of the passage are about his inexperience in punishing Christians and his musings about how to appropriately to punish them (including death). Eventually he says: "They affirmed, however, the whole of their guilt, or their error, was, that they were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternative voices a hym to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft, or adultery..." In the last part of the above paragraph Pliny says, "but I could discover nothing more than depraved and excessive superstition." This sort of comment would be expected from a nonbeliever. BUT... What does Pliny's observation of these early Christians suggest that they believed about Jesus? I submit that when Pliny said they were singing as "to a god" that he was witnessing Christian belief in the deity of Jesus. Not being a monotheist himself, Pliny would never have said the people sang to Jesus as God. His best description of deity worship (according to his world view) would necessarily refer to Jesus as a god. I discuss this here because I have had it up to my eyeballs with people saying that some church or council decided that Jesus is God, and that these are the main reasons people today believe that Jesus is God. Most people who have said this are not completely aware of what was going on in Nicea in 325 AD. I'll get this in while since I can be overly academic, and there may be other things people want to discuss. In the meantime, does anybody out there really think anyone on this forum would believe something because of a council vote? We are all smarter than that..... It's very hard to apply logic and reason to something that is paranormal. And I believe that is the way it is intended. What I mean is that it is there is a great deal of faith that is required. AF- Do you believe that Jesus is the only way to the Father? Oh, and do you believe that Jesus is God? Thanks! This is for Aunty. Somehow I missed your posts above what TW has quoted. I get what you are saying about applying logic and reason. I certainly did not go looking for "proof" before I came to faith. There are a few people I know that did. I think Life and Love is probably more adept than I am at discussing a decision to come to Jesus without absolute undeniable proof. Until we hear from him, let me say that looking into evidence after I came to faith has only strengthened it. I have never found anything to lead me away, and I am one of those people who doesn't believe hardly anything unless I verify it myself. I think there is a tendency these days to base our belief systems largely on feelings, so I guess I find it important to discuss some things according to evidence and logic. I don't think our feelings are always reliable. In the end, we can't replicate the first coming of Christ before our own eyes, so our decision has to be based on something, and that something is God drawing a person to himself and revealing himself and the resultant conviction that they are not innocent before him. He knows that there are a few people out there that want to see some hard evidence while he is in the process of drawing them to himself. Last Edited by Jenann on 09/19/2011 10:24 PM |
Xisuthros Rex
User ID: 908143 United States 09/19/2011 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No one see's ninja-Jesus coming! Even the thieves of the night are like "that's one sneaky guy right there...wait where'd he go?" Last Edited by Xisuthros Rex on 09/19/2011 10:14 PM This is my day, there are many like it...but this one is mine. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1323894 United States 09/19/2011 10:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... the school gave me the greatest thing imaginable: my own Bible. Quoting: Jenann To be continued. Please continue. () Sure, Daniel, I will continue. Two authors' opionions on the existence of Jesus is enough for now. I left off with the receipt of my very first Bible. My family continued to have no church, so most of what I was learning about God came from reading the Bible. We only had to take one "religion" class during my time at the Catholic high school. Its focus was history and not personal faith. It was actually pretty interesting. So I continued my own little life with God through reading my Bible and praying. Then we moved back to Ohio to a smaller town than before. A couple new friends invited me to their church. The first church I visited was pretty weird, and I did not go back. Only when the DaVinci Code book came out did I realize that what my high school friend called a church was really a Masonic temple. Then the fact that the children's area in the "church" was full of comic books about the Druids made sense. The second church I went to was a mainline protestant church that you would all recognize. My friend was heavily involved, and I went often enough to propose that my parents check it out. I did not officially join since I was going off to college (I graduated a year early). At the time, I did not know that were means of fellowship apart from one of the denominations. Recall that my parents gave me no insight on this sort of thing. I was basically clueless. I am not saying that denominations are bad, by the way. I think a person has to pick and choose carefully when becoming involved in a local body of Christ. There was definitely something missing, and now I know it has to do with intimate involvement with the body of Christ. There were probably smaller groups for fellowship that I was not aware of. My parents go to that church to this day. So I went off to college, but I never got involved with a group during that time. I was aware of a couple of groups I did not want to be involved in, and beyond that nobody every invited me to their group, and I did not actively seek one out. My private worship and study continued. After college I heard the call of God pretty clearly regarding his desire for me to be involved with other believers. That is when I started church shopping. After some serious searching I was pretty frustrated that I had found the place that God was calling me to. Then one day after my vacation, I came home to listen to an unlikely answering machine message. I had met this guy at a party eleven months prior to this message. We had exchanged phone numbers, and I didn't hear from him within a reasonable amount of time, so I thought that was it for him. So his message indicated that he wanted to invite me to go water skiing with him and his friends. My first thought was "after eleven months...you have got to be kidding me!" There were two factors that led to my returning the phone call. One was curiosity and the other was that I remembered there was something different about him that had to do with God. The water skiing opportunity had passed, so he picked me up at work for lunch, and then subsequently we began to spend more and more time together. He told me about his fellowship and we discovered that we believed the same things about God and Jesus. I did not tell him I was looking for a group. My promise to myself was that I was not going to get involved in a group because of a man, and that it was going to be because of God and God alone. I decided to check out his fellowship behind his back. I dragged a friend with me to the address that was in the phone book. Our plan was to go in the evening since he attended in the morning. We arrived on time, and nobody was there. I called the fellowship the next day and told the person who answered the phone that I tried to attend but that no one was there. It turned out that their offices are at a separate location from their meeting place. My friend and I had gone to the wrong place. I got the correct address for the meeting place and suggested they amend their phone book entry. Apparently, this had not come up before since just about everybody who attends does so at the invitation of a friend. Finally the next week my friend and I returned,this time to the correct location, and I knew within ten or fifteen minutes that I was "home." My friend was in agreement that this was a fellowship that preached the true gospel as it is written in the Bible. The particular friend that came with me already had a believing church that I was not interested in (she prefers a more traditional church). I started attending regularly on my own and found that the group had started as a small Bible study near the campus of the university I attended. It had grown to the point that they rented an old warehouse for their large meetings. I discovered early on that this was just one aspect of the group. The life of the fellowship was in the home churches, something I had never heard of before. They are more or less based on the house church movement of the early church as discussed in the Bible. After a couple of months I called the office and said I wanted a home group but that I did not want to go to my guy friend's group since I was checking things out behind his back. They gave me a meeting time and address. Boy were the people in that group surprised! It was unheard of for someone to just show up like I did without knowing someone in the group. They were very warm and inviting, and I attended for about a month before I finally confessed to my guy friend who said I was always welcome to check out his home church. I did and I stayed in his group since it was a better fit for me (we did not end up together). The overall fellowship got bigger and bigger until land was purchased and a good sized campus was constructed. I wish I could adequately describe the sweetness of Christian fellowship in the context of a group that is small enough where you consider every member to be a close friend. We all still attend the large meeting, but after the teaching is over, we hang out in our small group and potluck. Our study of the Bible continues to be one of my favorite aspects of my life. I don't think I could find a better place to learn and share. And of course, my one on one time with God has only gotten better. The word is an amazing representation of love. Each sentence is woven into a huge tapestry of God's revelation of himself. It is so intricate that there is not a person who has ever existed that could have made it up. Thanks- very nice story Are you still in Ohio? What part? (We are near Columbus) >< Thanks for saying so, and we live near Columbus too. |
Xisuthros Rex
User ID: 908143 United States 09/19/2011 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jesus didn't exist. He is a solar myth along with about 29 other man deities based on the "sun" and born of a virgin on Dec 25th when the "sun" is born again on the cross of the zodiac. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1323894 Next topic. So because the idea is a universal albeit local archetype, means it never manifests? Last Edited by Xisuthros Rex on 09/19/2011 10:24 PM This is my day, there are many like it...but this one is mine. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1499877 United States 09/19/2011 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In the meantime, does anybody out there really think anyone on this forum would believe something because of a council vote? We are all smarter than that..... Quoting: Jenann It certainly was not put to a vote. War and conquest by the Romans and later the Roman Catholic Church, forced people to convert from their old religions to the new Universal (Catholic) religion - Christianity. Your own ancestors were probably forced by the Catholic Church to convert from goddess worship to Christianity. Who knows how many of us are of Jewish heritage and forced to convert, or whose ancestors were tortured and finally converted. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1323894 United States 09/19/2011 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jesus didn't exist. He is a solar myth along with about 29 other man deities based on the "sun" and born of a virgin on Dec 25th when the "sun" is born again on the cross of the zodiac. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1323894 Next topic. So because the idea is a universal albeit local archetype, means it never manifests? "It" is always manifest. "It" dos not localize in the body of one being. You clones want a savior. A guy you can talk with and shake hands. A guy you can look in the eyes and have him smile back. It is your "need" and your "agenda" that causes you to create what you need in the form of a personalized "god". |
Jenann
(OP) User ID: 1465884 United States 09/19/2011 10:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jesus didn't exist. He is a solar myth along with about 29 other man deities based on the "sun" and born of a virgin on Dec 25th when the "sun" is born again on the cross of the zodiac. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1323894 Next topic. If you go back I posted one tiny piece of non-Biblical evidence that Jesus the person (regardless of what you believe about him) existed during the years the Bible indicates. I was probably too long winded about one piece of evidence, but it is what it is, and you are free to go back. If you want to get into the solar myth you mention, please let us know. Until then, I don't think anyone here believes Jesus was born on Dec. 25th. The holiday we know as Christmas does not resemble the true circumstances of Jesus' birth Last Edited by Jenann on 09/20/2011 02:09 AM |
Daniel's Seventieth Seven User ID: 1071051 United States 09/19/2011 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You clones want a savior. A guy you can talk with and shake hands. A guy you can look in the eyes and have him smile back. It is your "need" and your "agenda" that causes you to create what you need in the form of a personalized "god". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1323894 What do you need?....AC. You never did answer- Do you have any children? ? |