DERIVATIVES: The $600 Trillion Time Bomb That's Set to Explode

Problem with that theory is that you are fighting a "real" 10% infaltion rate. So, if you are making 8% interest on an asset you are at a "real" negative gain rate of -2% and remember you are paying taxes on that 8% gain (while inflation is increasing) so your "true" rate of return is -4.64% (@ a 33% tax rate)

Capice !

Hi Martial Law,

Found this while looking at the Federal Reserve Balance sheet, the other day: It is listed as either an asset or liability. But this is the entity they stuck the 2008 mess in they said they created it but the fed is holding it themselves.

This is where the derivatives are hiding:

Maiden Lane TransactionsFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Maiden Lane LLC)
Jump to: navigation, search
Maiden Lane Transactions refers to three limited liability companies created by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 2008 as a financial vehicle to facilitate transactions involving three entities: the former Bear Stearns company as the first entity, the former American International Group's lending division as the second, and the former American International Group's credit default swap division as the third. The name Maiden Lane was taken from a street which runs beside New York Federal Reserve in Manhattan.[1]

Contents
1 History
1.1 Maiden Lane LLC
1.2 Maiden Lane II LLC
1.3 Maiden Lane III LLC

And of course, you collect up undervalued or devalued property, claim a loss against other profits,(again, you cant do this to the same degree), or succession of losses, sit on it claiming continued losses, with transfers amongst friends and create conditions for its' eventual revaluation as amonopoly, or lack of further need of any valuation.

14 Trillion try 211 Trillion. If you don't believe me you can easily use a Search Engine to find the real 'Fiscal Gap'.

I C E L A N D

Why?

The bankers alone didn't create this.

...politicians did with EVERYBODY MUST HAVE A HOUSE...
...and Slick Willie repealing The Glass-Steagal Act of 1933.

POLITICIANS ENABLED THIS.....BANKERS JUST TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE SITUATION THAT WAS CREATED.



Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 10/14/2011 03:23 PM

[link to www.pbs.org]

for that to be true it would have had to have been an accident. my bet is they have been working together on it for decades now, i mean hey who pays the politicians off?

What if we just did the biblical thing, and forgave ALL debt every 7 years, and all land goes back to the owners. Seems lenders would be a little more careful with what they do. Just a thought.

they have a sweet video timeline, thx for the link.

[link to www.pbs.org]

yup, i've read about that one. i betcha its 211 tril is conservative.

The bankers want a guarantee where nobody else gets one.
Penny short, and a day late, you lose your stuff.
That's the forgiveness they have for you. For them, you forgive them their mistakes and make the whole out of your pocket.
Dont you get it? They make up money from thin air, by agreement with the gummint, charge their percentage up front, and 'lend' this fiction out to you, and then put that debt against the public debt as well, so even when you pay the 3 or 4 times original price back to them, made valuable by your sweat and labour and sacrifices, they take that now real money for themselves, as profit, and leave the debt against the public on the books, for you to pay again or for your schildren and grandchildren to do so in perpetuity.

You are not expected to beat the system, you are expected to fail and be found wanting...

Money is a tradable abstract of attention. That means you cannot extract more power of money than there are individuals to comply with there attention. To work for anybody is to pay attention.

What you have got that is the frozen part of your history. They can take your attention or they can take the results of your attention. Things for which you have payed with your attention already.

Who is legalized to decide what you have to pay or not. Who is allowed to determine when your dignity has been assaulted by an unfair approach. Who dares to judge whether you are in need or not.

Pay what you have to pay to go ahead.

What "accident"?
It was LEGISLATED by these politicians.
No two ways about that.

...and yes....OF COURSE they are in collusion with each other.

BUT....had the POLITICIANS not legislated / enabled this....it NEVER COULD HAVE HAPPENED.
BANKERS just ate it up after that.

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 10/14/2011 03:56 PM

D'uh, banker remunerate the politicians that license their usurous rackets. It;s a daisy chain except for the fact that it's the proles that get the buggaring.
No accident.
Even the ancients seemed to understand that usury
is in the end corrupt and destructive and predisposes to creation of caste systems?

.
And that my friend is the only reasonable answer indeed.
Case closed.

mrs;normajeanclayt0onpobox [email protected]