|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
What Do You Think - Both Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3 Show Paris as a "Ground Zero" type Location for a Future World War
|
|
Poster Handle
|
KingDingaLing |
|
Post Content
|
what's your favorite part about battlefield 3? how is the single player? and why so late on modern warfare? never got around to it?
as to your question, didn't they want to destroy the eiffel once anyway, being sort of an eyesore on the whole city...? lol
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1446470 I like how Battlefield 3 incorporates even a flight simulator type level. I haven't played the multiplayer yet! Definetly looking forward to that. I haven't had enough playing time. What is your favorite part? It is an eyesore and I'm surprised that the French allowed the building of a massive skeleton tower made of iron that would rust. I believe the true significance of the Eiffel tower is one of those Masonic Secrets. Heard the single player sucks, most people get it for the multiplayer. Me, I just drool at the vids on youtube, don't have either still lol Yeah but they know we respond well to symbols, we need symbols around the world for our brains to latch onto. Just that...well, when one symbol gets destroyed, that just has a devastating effect on us doesn't it. The one thing that bugs me (and a lot of others) are the number of glitches in the game still. They shouldn't have released it soo buggy, but they were probably trying to be sure it came out before MW3. Luckily the patches are in progress and being released every day.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
