Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,973 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 783,675
Pageviews Today: 1,048,861Threads Today: 279Posts Today: 4,332
09:01 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Bush and Kerry on Government Secrecy: Compare the Candidates, People!

 
dude h homeslice ix
11/01/2004 12:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Bush and Kerry on Government Secrecy: Compare the Candidates, People!
SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Volume 2004, Issue No. 95 October 30, 2004


** KERRY ON OPENNESS AND SECRECY
** BUSH ON OPENNESS AND SECRECY


KERRY ON OPENNESS AND SECRECY

Though it has gone largely unremarked by supporters and opponents alike, John Kerry has an extraordinary Senate record as an investigator and overseer of some of the government´s most controversial, complex and secretive activities.

He has repeatedly exposed abuses of the government secrecy system, and has often prevailed in overcoming unwarranted secrecy.

One high point of his Senate career is his chairmanship of the Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs, which culminated in a 1200 page final report in 1993.

Perhaps it is a sign of the anemic state of American democracy that this monument of government accountability is out of print and forgotten. But it is a remarkable document -- lucid, passionate and decent.

Among other things, the Committee report is a testament to the power of openness and declassification and to clarify and to heal.

The Kerry Committee´s achievements included "the most rapid and extensive declassification of public files and documents on a single issue in American history" as of 1993.

A decade before the 9/11 Commission wrestled with the White House over access to the President´s Daily Brief, members of Senator Kerry´s committee sought and gained limited access to PDBs in the first Bush Administration.

"Nothing has done more to fuel suspicion about the government´s handling of the POW/MIA issue than the fact that so many documents related to those efforts have remained classified for so long,"
the Kerry Committee report concluded.

"The Committee believes that its legacy will be that it removed the shroud of secrecy which for too long has hidden information about POW/MIAs from public scrutiny."

Though it pulled few punches and displayed a willingness to find fault with individuals and agencies inside and outside of government (and to praise others, such as then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney), Senator Kerry´s Committee was still able to function effectively on a bipartisan basis.

Of course, the policies of a hypothetical President Kerry cannot be reliably predicted based on the practices of Committee Chairman Kerry.

But it is noteworthy that as a Senator, Kerry demonstrated an exceptionally vivid understanding of the pitfalls of executive branch secrecy and the essential function of government accountability in a democracy.

The executive summary of the 1993 Report of Senator Kerry´s Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs may be found here:

[link to www.fas.org]


BUSH ON OPENNESS AND SECRECY

The documented increase in government secrecy under President Bush is partly driven by the heightened state of security associated with military action and the threat of terrorism. But it also reflects a seeming disdain for public deliberation and official accountability that predates September 11, 2001.

The President´s secrecy policies are within the parameters of the law and the Constitution -- with the exception of the refusal by the CIA and the Justice Department to release historical intelligence budget information, which violates the Constitutional statement and account clause, we believe.

But Bush Administration secrecy places a premium on strong executive branch authority at the expense of congressional oversight, freedom of information and even such mundane things as making the President available to answer questions from the press.
As a result, the character and the possibilities of citizenship in our democracy are increasingly constrained.

In a small but telling example, the telephone directory for the Department of Defense, which for many years used to be for sale at the Government Printing Office Bookstore, has been deemed "for official use only" in the Bush Administration and is no longer available. A wall between the public and its government that did not previously exist has now been erected.

(The White House´s own telephone directory is also stamped "for official use only," though it may be purchased by anyone for $35 from the private Bureau of National Affairs. Meanwhile, the Department of Energy, which handles information and materials as sensitive as any in government, makes its telephone directory available on the web.)

Many of the Bush Administration´s official policies and pronouncements on secrecy may be found here:

[link to www.fas.org]

A recent, mostly critical discussion of Bush Administration secrecy policy is presented in "Groups raise concerns about increased classification of documents" by Gregg Sangillo, National Journal, October 23:

[link to www.govexec.com]




_______________________________________________
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, send email to
[email protected]
with "subscribe" in the body of the message.

To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a blank email message to
[email protected]

OR email your request to [email protected]

Secrecy News is archived at:
[link to www.fas.org]

Secrecy News has an RSS feed at:
[link to www.fas.org]

_______________________
Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
web: www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
email: [email protected]
voice: (202) 454-4691
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush and Kerry on Government Secrecy: Compare the Candidates, People!
rotfl
dude h homeslice ix
12/08/2005 10:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush and Kerry on Government Secrecy: Compare the Candidates, People!
FEEDBACK ON KERRY AND BUSH AND SECRECY

Secrecy News was perhaps too hasty in proclaiming the healing power of declassification when it concerns the POW/MIA issue (SN, 10/30/04).
Quite a few readers wrote to express their dissatisfaction with the Senate investigation of the matter led by Senator John F. Kerry.

"There are thousands of documents still withheld and many still classified and hidden," according to one researcher. "The POW/MIA Select Committee [chaired by Sen. Kerry] was a miserable failure in accomplishing its objective in determining the fate of America´s POW/MIAs.... Please have your research assistants make a less superficial inquiry into the subject matter you report on."

"Opening up classified files does more harm than good because it presents a flood of stuff that creates the impression of a great release of information," contended another writer. "[The Select Committee material] was great in terms of volume, but a total fraud in terms of quality. Little information of real value was released.
Just stuff to keep people occupied and out of the way."

"I admire your work, enjoy your email missives, and I am also a strong advocate of open and accountable government," wrote another.
"However, I have to call you on your mention of the Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs as an example of government transparency. It was in fact an egregious example of a well orchestrated cover-up-in- plain-sight used to obfuscate the fact that our government forsook thousands of POWs."

Others wrote in to express their agreement with Secrecy News.

"This one was excellent," affirmed one reader. "Kerry deserves credit for that work which only he and McCain could do. The POW/MIA issue was, indeed, a perfect issue for sunshine policies and the point you have made is one that no one else would make."

"I´d endorse what you say about Kerry´s record as an investigator,"
wrote another, "both for the POW/MIA report and also for his report with Senator Hank Brown on the Bank of Credit and Commerce International which remains the single most thorough and comprehensive document about what remains (for the moment) the world´s largest ever banking scandal."

The text of that 1992 report on the BCCI affair is here:

[link to www.fas.org]

On the other hand, "I thought you were too kind to Bush," wrote another correspondent.

"I would take exception to your characterization of his policies as within the parameters of the law and Constitution. I think the Supreme Court said clearly that his detention of Hamdi and even the prisoners at Guantanamo was beyond any constitutional or legal authority. This administration has been quick to come up with novel but unsupported legal theories to justify whatever actions they want to take. We have seen this with their memos on the Geneva convention (the most recent thing about allowing the CIA to take prisoners out of Iraq for detention and interrogation). And Bush´s ´re-write´ of the Presidential Records Act can only be read as the work of someone who doesn´t care what the statute says."

"Well, we know how you´re voting," wrote one psychic reader.





GLP