Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,337 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 633,826
Pageviews Today: 1,027,972Threads Today: 412Posts Today: 6,893
10:45 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Conciousness, filters and the eschatological age
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
Can you be a little more specific? The major ongoing debate is the inherent quality and extraterrestriality of time. As sol is an extra-dynamic force and Luna an intra dynamic cyclic which applies very real organic cycles to our endocrine and tidal cycles.

Couple these with internal and internal plasmic forces and we get quite the realm of possibilities. Even speaking to the essential qualities of the Sang Real or holy blood.

this is why I ask for conciousness above filters.

I'm also hoping you aren't implying christian creationist dogma. The mayan cycle purports a time frame of 16.4 billion years. Archaeological evidence points to the Egyptian civilization being active potentially 40 000 years ago.

3114 bce is only relevant because there is record of the occurences at the transit of venus.

It is also a correlation between this approximate date and the Mayan National underworld.
 Quoting: dion


i shortened you to dion, hope you don`t mind rockon
i could make sense of what you are saying but i am feeling if i did it, would not be what you see

more specific:

In 1963, Walter Cronkite in the national television evening news, commenting on Dr. Walter Russell's death, referred to him as "... the Leonardo da Vinci of our time."
 Quoting: observation

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

In less time than it takes to put it into words, I knew all there was to know of the CAUSE of all effect, for there was very little to know.
 Quoting: Walter Russell


why do you believe walter is wrong?
 Quoting: aether


Are you suggesting something about inverse square and interpolation of field effects or force at a distance being consequent of solar vs Lunar effects or implied affectation?

It is not solely about electrical effect, but speaks directly of the lunar cycle being harmonized with organic homeostatic function.

It could even be inferred that the moon was potentially an earth cast off and it's material entanglement has greater direct relational effect.

The sun regardless of Russells theory does not directly effect these phenomenon as proportionately as the Lunar cycle.

The Egyptians made these differences known in their mystery schools. I'll place an addendum in the next reply. It could be deduced that the interpolation of these two systems may create a greater than synergistic effect, but each is an interpretation.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP