Why are we not mining Helium-3 from the Moon? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9923745 Argentina 02/19/2012 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
meletos
User ID: 10114964 Sweden 02/19/2012 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3767410 New Zealand 02/19/2012 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lapetus
(OP) User ID: 9357516 United States 02/19/2012 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2864150 United States 02/19/2012 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10957386 United Kingdom 02/19/2012 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9851081 Canada 02/19/2012 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10957386 United Kingdom 02/19/2012 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
HANGFIRE
User ID: 10894582 United States 02/19/2012 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 02/19/2012 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two good reasons: Mining the stuff is not like finding a seam and shoveling into a hopper. The Helium-3 exists as a microscopically thin layer mixed in with everything else that is on the surface of the lunar soil. To "mine" it, you need to scrape cubic kilometers of soil then process those kilotons of raw material to extract the small amount of Helium-3. Which means even with some really sophisticated robotics, to get a mining operation running you'd need a full-time crew of humans up there to keep the machines going. Which means a long-term base. Which means sending the equivalent of hundreds of Apollo missions there. No nation has that kind of launch capacity or space capability. Not yet. The other downside to Helium-3 is that Helium-3 fusion is scientifically plausible but has yet to actually be achieved. We are just barely reaching break-even with the easier D-T fusion, and we are decades from it being industrially scaleable. So, sure, I see Helium-3 mining as possible one day. But not for at least another twenty years. |
HANGFIRE
User ID: 10894582 United States 02/19/2012 01:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8640588 United States 02/19/2012 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Either someone is full of shit or we are all fools for not wanting to tap into this energy. Are we going to let China get to it first? Quoting: Lapetus [link to www.explainingthefuture.com] As reported in an Artemis Project paper, about 25 tonnes of helium-3 -- or a fully-loaded Space Shuttle cargo bay's worth -- could power the United States for a year. This means that helium-3 has a potential economic value in the order of $3bn a tonne -- making it the only thing remotely economically viable to consider mining from the Moon given current and likely-near-future space travel technologies and capabilities. Because the gov wont sign off on it until BP and Halliburton are ready to strat the operation. |