Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,949 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,065,053
Pageviews Today: 2,122,374Threads Today: 903Posts Today: 18,909
11:19 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Arguing for the NWO.

 
Vast Deferens
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 17509594
United States
07/09/2012 05:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Arguing for the NWO.
So I need to do an argumentative research paper for a college course that references sources.

I want to argue the need for massive, swift population reduction. Not something I personally agree with, but it is good to know thine enemy.

So I'm asking for links to any sources that argue FOR mass population reduction. Basically, I'm looking for links to proof that the global elites are looking to cull the sheep.

CFR documents, Rockafeller Foundation, scientific articles, etc.

I know some of you have these links of pdf's saved, so any help would be appreciated.


This is not a thread to argue the pros/cons, I'm just looking for sources.

Thanks,

Vast
Hosea 2:2 Plead with your mother, plead: for she is not my wife, neither am I her husband: let her therefore put away her whoredoms out of her sight, and her adulteries from between her breasts; 2:3 Lest I strip her naked, and set her as in the day that she was born, and make her as a wilderness, and set her like a dry land, and slay her with thirst.
chris999

User ID: 18723832
United States
07/09/2012 05:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
I wish I knew some concrete links to give to you, but TPTB keep this stuff secret from the public so that they dont cause a worldwide panic.

The only sources I have heard of are moles that have infiltrated the Bilderberg Group meetings and U.N. meetings.

Good luck with your research.
I dont mean everything I say to be literal. I just like to throw around ideas, and play devil's advocate.

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.

-Galileo Galilei
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19440131
United States
07/09/2012 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
fuck the NWO
that's all i have to say
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1497469
United States
07/09/2012 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Read "The human situation" By aldous Huxley.
You don't need to read it all. the first 2-3 chapters are about your topic.
Then you should also read the last 2 chapters just because...

The human situation explains why we MUST have a world government(This doesn't mean a gov run by our current slavemasters, btw).

Also, a "brave new world revisted" by Aldous huxley will cover the whole overpopulation issue.
He basically(but in a lot more detail, and with great evidence) says we're doomed in 50-100 years....that was 60 years ago.

You're welcome.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19425797
Brazil
07/09/2012 05:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Population reduction is urgently needed, because a smaller population is much easier to control.

A world population of just 500 million (half a billion) people would be much more easier to handle, much more easier to control.

A 7 billion population is proving difficult to control, it's too much people to keep under surveillance, too many trouble-makers, too many variables...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5967903
United Kingdom
07/09/2012 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
fuck the NWO. fuck everything and everyone. fuck you!!

5a
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18558820
United Kingdom
07/09/2012 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Population reduction is urgently needed, because a smaller population is much easier to control.

A world population of just 500 million (half a billion) people would be much more easier to handle, much more easier to control.

A 7 billion population is proving difficult to control, it's too much people to keep under surveillance, too many trouble-makers, too many variables...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797


bollocks

and, of course, you first
Ghost375
User ID: 1497469
United States
07/09/2012 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Oh, Just the first essay is about overpopulation in the "brave new world revistited"
The rest is about how what he envisioned in "a brave new world" was happening much quicker than he anticipated.
It also explains exactly how we're already brainwashed slaves....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19425797
Brazil
07/09/2012 05:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Population reduction is urgently needed, because a smaller population is much easier to control.

A world population of just 500 million (half a billion) people would be much more easier to handle, much more easier to control.

A 7 billion population is proving difficult to control, it's too much people to keep under surveillance, too many trouble-makers, too many variables...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797


bollocks

and, of course, you first
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18558820



Oh, I don't agree with a single word of what I wrote.

That's just the REAL reason why the "masters of the world" want depopulation.

I was just giving OP what he asked: the arguments that the elites use to justify depopulation. In this case, the arguments that they use among themselves, away from the eyes of the public...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18558820
United Kingdom
07/09/2012 05:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
and we were not put on this earth to be 'controlled' by no fucker

who fucking says so?

who the fuck put THEM in charge


to the OP, cant you choose another subject? people will probably take it literally and before you know it, we will have a dozen more compliant sheep
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18558820
United Kingdom
07/09/2012 05:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Population reduction is urgently needed, because a smaller population is much easier to control.

A world population of just 500 million (half a billion) people would be much more easier to handle, much more easier to control.

A 7 billion population is proving difficult to control, it's too much people to keep under surveillance, too many trouble-makers, too many variables...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797


bollocks

and, of course, you first
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18558820



Oh, I don't agree with a single word of what I wrote.

That's just the REAL reason why the "masters of the world" want depopulation.

I was just giving OP what he asked: the arguments that the elites use to justify depopulation. In this case, the arguments that they use among themselves, away from the eyes of the public...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797

ok, cool. no need to top yourself cool2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19428627
Slovenia
07/09/2012 05:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
fuck the NWO. fuck everything and everyone. fuck you!!

5a
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5967903


chainsaw everybody chainsaw everything
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3801229
Portugal
07/09/2012 05:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Population reduction is urgently needed, because a smaller population is much easier to control.

A world population of just 500 million (half a billion) people would be much more easier to handle, much more easier to control.

A 7 billion population is proving difficult to control, it's too much people to keep under surveillance, too many trouble-makers, too many variables...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797


Thats fucking stupid. Eventho they like control it's all about the resources, our planet does not have unlimited resources .
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19425797
Brazil
07/09/2012 05:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Population reduction is urgently needed, because a smaller population is much easier to control.

A world population of just 500 million (half a billion) people would be much more easier to handle, much more easier to control.

A 7 billion population is proving difficult to control, it's too much people to keep under surveillance, too many trouble-makers, too many variables...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797


Thats fucking stupid. Eventho they like control it's all about the resources, our planet does not have unlimited resources .
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3801229



Yes, it has.

The only needed thing is insanely cheap energy. And it can be achieved with FUSION POWER.

With insanely cheap energy, this planet can handle 20 million humans easily, let alone 7 billion...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18247766
United Kingdom
07/09/2012 05:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
[link to lmgtfy.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14332235
United States
07/09/2012 05:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
supposedly the UN has documents calling for 80% world depopulation by a certain date. but good luck finding the actual documents.

the georgia guidestones are another source. they speak of keeping the world population at 500 million.

but if you ask me, i think if they wanted to control the population of the world, they would have had better methods in place already than mass genocide of 80% of 7 billion people. i mean it is an awfully big mess to clean up.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7242673
United Kingdom
07/09/2012 05:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Over-population wouldn't even be a problem if we didn't have the retarded attitude we have now of trying to save every single newborn and trying to prolong the life of the elderly.

Nature must be allowed to kill off the weak and the sick.

I don't agree with depopulation plans, but you can't say we aren't a fucking locust plague on this planet. There are too many people.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18226512
Ireland
07/09/2012 05:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
I have an alternative, perhaps a bit insane suggestion,

Why don't we exterminate all the leftists, all the "illuminatti" everyone that thinks we should have population control, and then we close off certain farmland in case f emergency and then just let the market and nature do the rest.

Nature never let us down in this regard. Humans always make bad choices, you know, like jimmy carter saying we were going to run out of oil in the 90s even though technology always pushes up recoverables every decade.

Why don't we just eliminate every stupid Fck that wants to excercise population control. There is after all, something called google maps. It's not very hard to find,

Have a good day,
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18226512
Ireland
07/09/2012 05:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Blankfien....the head of jpmortan chase..

In a collapse...google maps and cheap robots/explosives are still pretty easy to use.

Just something to think about
5ingularity

User ID: 9473142
United States
07/09/2012 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
So I need to do an argumentative research paper for a college course that references sources.

I want to argue the need for massive, swift population reduction. Not something I personally agree with, but it is good to know thine enemy.

So I'm asking for links to any sources that argue FOR mass population reduction. Basically, I'm looking for links to proof that the global elites are looking to cull the sheep.

CFR documents, Rockafeller Foundation, scientific articles, etc.

I know some of you have these links of pdf's saved, so any help would be appreciated.


This is not a thread to argue the pros/cons, I'm just looking for sources.

Thanks,

Vast
 Quoting: Vast Deferens

The popular anti NWO commentator is good at referencing source material for his findings so listen to his show and read his articles, he frequently cites the source.

If you really want the big picture your gonna have to consider in your research the esoteric beliefs of the elite. Main ideas are that nature is cyclical and that this planet is all but a level in a big game. They are the game masters and call the rules.
Right now we have reached an apex in which we have highly developed technology but a crumbling social structure. The idea behind police state and mass depopulation is that we need a reset to regain perspective of time, space and our souls. We have lost it over the years due to materialism, materialism was supposed to be just a tool to understand other things (mainly conquer the ego), but it has taken the place as the main belief (golden Calf) of our society.
So sooner than later we are due to experience hardship, so out of hardship there will be a cleansing, all the "wicked" and "sinful" will wither away while the strong community and nature orientated few inherit the new world.
With front row tickets to experience the show of lifetimes, I fear no more.
-_0
Unheard

User ID: 19272734
United States
07/09/2012 06:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
The Georgia Guidestones are the NWO's 10 commandments.

[link to www.youtube.com]


You could say they are trying to make a perfect planet. But that will entail killing off 90% of the current population.
5ingularity

User ID: 9473142
United States
07/09/2012 06:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Population reduction is urgently needed, because a smaller population is much easier to control.

A world population of just 500 million (half a billion) people would be much more easier to handle, much more easier to control.

A 7 billion population is proving difficult to control, it's too much people to keep under surveillance, too many trouble-makers, too many variables...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797


Thats fucking stupid. Eventho they like control it's all about the resources, our planet does not have unlimited resources .
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3801229



Yes, it has.

The only needed thing is insanely cheap energy. And it can be achieved with FUSION POWER.

With insanely cheap energy, this planet can handle 20 million humans easily, let alone 7 billion...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19425797


We squander away the "limited" (Actually very abundant energy in historical terms) ones we have available now, if we cant get along with something that is limited and share it equally can you imagine what would happen with unlimited?...if I where NWO id definitely keep the Mr. Fusion device in lock-down until the kids learn to play nice with their current toys.
With front row tickets to experience the show of lifetimes, I fear no more.
-_0
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8846775
United States
07/09/2012 06:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Over-population wouldn't even be a problem if we didn't have the retarded attitude we have now of trying to save every single newborn and trying to prolong the life of the elderly.

Nature must be allowed to kill off the weak and the sick.

I don't agree with depopulation plans, but you can't say we aren't a fucking locust plague on this planet. There are too many people.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7242673


bumpbumpbumpbump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17119454
United States
07/09/2012 06:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
In Europe, the other continents, and empires, a smaller population might be easier to control, but in North America, the vast tracks of land per capita was our greatest advantage and sadly now the growing population is the greatest contributing factor to the lowering of quality of life and removal of rights.

More people = more:

* Laws, rules, and regulations
* Demand irregardless of Supply
* Crime
* Cars on the road
* Pollution, waste and garbage
* Excrement and urine in the water table
* Strain on basic services
* Crowded and failing schools, hospitals, prisons
* More problems for the individual in the name of the many


In the past and present, civilizations where younger fertility rates are compounded by younger, earlier reproduction, child marriages, etc... populations swell to the breaking point, humans turn on one another and, create and ensure cast systems, dehumanize sub groups, enslave their fellow man.

Look at the present day Philippines, where cities are so crowded families are dwelling under trees and in cemeteries, or India, where only one "kind" get to scrub toilets but where even basic sewage systems can't be constructed and employed fast enough to cope with the growing load of human waste to where they're only the next rainfall away from everybody walking, drinking and living in rivers of human waste.

Or South America who's past was drenched in the blood of human sacrifice, ritual torture and slavery. Human blood and tissue, and bones, so easy to come by they were enjoyed like "resources", pyramids and jewelry decorated with bones, human skin worn like garments, entire cities literally painted red in human blood. Then those millions who walked out of the rain forest quickly became billions with the aid of modern mechanized agriculture and pesticides to where even the modern supply and infastructure can't keep up with the demand, ruining quality of life for everybody to where once again the descend on one another and migrate north bound by the millions.

Or Africa, past or present where human life is so readily and arbitrarily created en mass with no regard for the state of humanity present or tomorrow that millions of children are and have been and will continue to be starving daily, yet more are constantly created than are dying. The reason children will always be starving in Africa is because their only contribution to the world will always be an even greater number of starving African children. In living conditions such as this, human life among neighboring humans has zero value.

In modern day Haiti, a microcosm for unchecked deforestation, overpopulation, they have nothing, no forests or trees, or even land to farm. There are no resources left so they burn everything, garbage, plastic, tires to heat their huts and tents at night, huts and tents often constructed directly on the roads, entire roads blocked, to make room for more people to lay, fornicate, burn garbage, import food.

When any country goes from being a food exporter to food importer, the deal is done, there can be no road to recovery, only eaters and breeders soon ruled by machetes and barbarity.

Should they have some resource: oil or mineral, those populations become cornered and ruled by the same barbarity but with imported arms instead of the machete.

I am not an shill or advocate for the nwo, but I do see the writing in the wall.

Contrary to global disposition, quality of life and human rights is not based on racial, religious or geographic factors, it is based on numbers, human numbers. More people always results in each human life having less value til ultimately folks are trading in slaves, skins, ears, and scalps.

There are two humanities:

Humanity: The Humane

Humanity: The Human Bio-mass



The bio-mass has no language, no belief or direction, common goal, or purpose, only to grow and consume, grow and consume. The bio mass will consume the humane, and they already are.
SC22
User ID: 14286098
United States
07/09/2012 06:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Julian Simon was right about human population. Brilliant man.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11677814
United States
07/09/2012 07:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Prince Philip: In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.

[link to www.agent] provocateur/prince.html
redzed

User ID: 3724229
United Kingdom
07/09/2012 07:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
Prince Philip: In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.

[link to www.agent] provocateur/prince.html
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11677814


Not like Prince Philip to be controversial.

[link to www.mirror.co.uk]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18710599
United States
07/09/2012 07:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
So I need to do an argumentative research paper for a college course that references sources.

I want to argue the need for massive, swift population reduction. Not something I personally agree with, but it is good to know thine enemy.

So I'm asking for links to any sources that argue FOR mass population reduction. Basically, I'm looking for links to proof that the global elites are looking to cull the sheep.

CFR documents, Rockafeller Foundation, scientific articles, etc.

I know some of you have these links of pdf's saved, so any help would be appreciated.


This is not a thread to argue the pros/cons, I'm just looking for sources.

Thanks,

Vast
 Quoting: Vast Deferens


i will only help you if you PROMISE that in the conclusion you will at least try to give the other point of view that any means to depopulate the planet will be malevolent at best and of course you MUST ask the question, who is doing the depopulating and who gets to stay alive? how is that decided?
Anne O'Mally

User ID: 18847930
United States
07/09/2012 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
your handle is cracking me up. :)
worth my weight in squirrels.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1445731
United States
07/09/2012 08:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
So I need to do an argumentative research paper for a college course that references sources.

I want to argue the need for massive, swift population reduction. Not something I personally agree with, but it is good to know thine enemy.

So I'm asking for links to any sources that argue FOR mass population reduction. Basically, I'm looking for links to proof that the global elites are looking to cull the sheep.

CFR documents, Rockafeller Foundation, scientific articles, etc.

I know some of you have these links of pdf's saved, so any help would be appreciated.


This is not a thread to argue the pros/cons, I'm just looking for sources.

Thanks,

Vast
 Quoting: Vast Deferens


NWO = Neanderthals World Order


cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14392840
United States
07/09/2012 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Arguing for the NWO.
None of us has yet seen the New World Order

We are living in the Old World Order.





GLP