X Marks the Spot

the superiority complex of an ego un-checked,,

is as previlant when witnessed,, in monkeys,, as it is,, within all any so called self appointed supreme dietys,,

ego,, un-checked = easy manipulation,,

devoid of any ultimate wisdom,, only self limited wisdom,,

and yet somehow still retaining a full knowledge of a self possesed grandier born outcome,, interesting,,

this is often the control illusion,, of half the needed faculties required,, too correctly survey,, the positional truth of any misguided bravado,, as witnessed,,

interesting indeed from the monkey point of view,,


as monkey see,,

will monkey do,,



much love,,

what else can you bring to the table?,,

as the hunger persists,,

and its feeding time,,

much love,,

Seer...looking forward to chatting in the future...

prefer a banana,,

oh well,, this monkey is used to going without,,

but it may miss the potassium,,


however and regardless,,



egos may be stroked or often patted,,

yet it is the egos of many here,, this one included,, that are desively troublesome,,

most ego pats,, are often here given too each other as a reward for a knowledge already known and recognised,,

if it is not known,, then the pat is still openly received,, and a further pat is then returned and always taken gladly with relish,, or sauce if prefered,,

where lies the wisdom in this?,, each patted ego here,, agreeing to the same things over and over?,,

no offence too anyone intended,,



this one suggests a discovery of greator truths,,

as all ego fetted beliefs however regurgetated are simply no longer palatable,,



unless of course its a bannana,,


or?,,


much love,,

Dear seer, trust your intuition, press your mind forward and speak. Trust that. See shads example.. a fine one at that. Seeing wat is hidden, but present. Taking hold of the answer that is always there.. just marked absent. Seeing beyond what is "face" value and trusting it.

Some here/here, have been asking sooo long they became the question. Forgetting this, they were the answer. The quest of the question is to seek the answer.

Shad, finding his answer was with him the whole time, not the hole time.. gives him confidence. Explore that. Build upon it. There is no ability that can not be grasped and used. At first it is like trying to hammer nails with a broom.. untill you find a broom is for something entirely different and you need to use the appropriate tool for the application.

The more you trust it, apply it, the more refined it becomes you.

Skill is the best trade one can aquire.

prefer a banana,,

oh well,, this monkey is used to going without,,

but it may miss the potassium,,


however and regardless,,



egos may be stroked or often patted,,

yet it is the egos of many here,, this one included,, that are desively troublesome,,

most ego pats,, are often here given too each other as a reward for a knowledge already known and recognised,,

if it is not known,, then the pat is still openly received,, and a further pat is then returned and always taken gladly with relish,, or sauce if prefered,,

where lies the wisdom in this?,, each patted ego here,, agreeing to the same things over and over?,,

no offence too anyone intended,,



this one suggests a discovery of greator truths,,

as all ego fetted beliefs however regurgetated are simply no longer palatable,,



unless of course its a bannana,,


or?,,


much love,,

see7





kind words indeed,,

but beware as your earlier guide said,,

somthing about a kindness being a rust upon youre ego,,

???,,


much love,,

Oh and be mindful of others who glorify you through seductive sugjestion..

Ego serves like rust on a tool.

Yes.

Good piece of advice here. One I have heeded. Always good to have a booster.

agreed,, the warning was possibly against this ones seductive attention,,

as any tool of sharpness can often be blunted seduction,,

if this one be stone,, then let it be the shapner,,

not the bluntner,,



as the s-words cut from falsehood may blunt,,

so shall the stone to sharpen be thy rock,,




much love,,

Bananas for everyone!

Firstly, what an important point to make about artificial telepathy. This is the danger in investing one's self in frequencies that are harmful...who really wants to be a pawn? Perhaps it's exactly through these harmful frequencies that so many channel disinformation.

Secondly, lol, I don't need to locate an old radio because I am an old radio receiver...

Seriously, this is one of the first things that I was told after awakening (early 90's). The person who told me this looked at me with pitiful concern. They told me they were sorry to tell me that because I was still not yet aware and educated enough to understand the implications of being a wide open, undiscriminating conduit. They told me to learn fast to shear up my energy field.

It still yet took me a few years to understand what this person was talking about, and then even more years to get my energy field more rock solid, with no auric tears/consciousness inroads, than not.

I don't mess around with listening to too much like is found on youtube "spiritual" videos or other alike websites. Even if I trust the source - like Tom Kenyon's Hathors sounds - I just won't do it.

If I can't do what needs to be done for my healthful energy growth under my own steam, then it doesn't get done. Given this I have always been vigilant about exploring and healing myself at all consciousness levels.

The beauty and breath of the Muse

Is what this One is ever seeking.

Atomism (from ancient Greek atomos, meaning "uncuttable") is a natural philosophy that developed in several ancient traditions. The atomists theorized that the natural world consists of two fundamental parts: indivisible atoms and empty void.

According to Aristotle, atoms are indestructible and immutable and there are an infinite variety of shapes and sizes. They move through the void, bouncing off each other, sometimes becoming hooked with one or more others to form a cluster. Clusters of different shapes, arrangements, and positions give rise to the various macroscopic substances in the world.

According to Aristotle, the heavenly bodies are the most perfect realities, (or "substances"), whose motions are ruled by principles other than those of bodies in the sublunary sphere. The latter are composed of one or all of the four classical elements (earth, water, air, fire) and are perishable; but the matter the heavens are made of is imperishable aether, so they are not subject to generation and corruption. Hence their motions are eternal and perfect, and the perfect motion is the circular one, which, unlike the earthly up-and down-ward locomotions, can last eternally selfsame. As substances, celestial bodies have matter (aether) and a form: it seems that Aristotle did regard them as living beings with a rational soul as their form

Leaving no stone unturned, some thunderstones may have acquired their association with lightning in still other ways.

As mentioned in part three of this article, a future realisation that the Australites may actually have precipitated within the past 10,000 years would certainly hit hard.

Yet even this hardly exhausts possibilities. Did some people anciently develop an awareness of the electric properties of some minerals, such as quartz – ‘thunder’ or ‘lightning’ being the closest lexical terms in the vocabulary to ‘electricity’? The equal popularity of quartz crystals and thunderstones among the world’s shamans, often febrile and sensitive to electromagnetic fields, points in this direction. And Pliny did compare ceraunia, the ‘thunderstone’, to rock crystal.

Or was the thunderstone, despite all this, at home in the actual phenomenology of lightning? Did sightings of ball lightning provide an impetus? The association is almost tangible in a tradition such as this one from Czechia: ‘The thunder strikes the earth in the shape of a ball; this ball makes one invisible … The thunder is a glowing stone as large as a walnut, placed under the timbers of the roof as a safeguard against lightning’....................

The galactic electric field question reminds me of something I’d heard of a few years ago. They are called “Hypervelocity Stars” and by way of “black hole” interaction are supposedly former binaries supposedly ‘ripped’ apart with the companion being at flung at high velocity into the hinterlands of the galactic halo. Low and behold here is a paper (careful with the use of the word “possibly” and “could”) supposedly observing “more outgoing stars than ingoing stars (i.e. positive Galactocentric velocities vs negative ones)” and also suggesting that these hypervelocity stars “have been ejected from the Galactic center and then propagated in the Galactic potential up to their current position.”:
[link to arxiv.org]

I recall chiding this find because of the “black hole” relation but their velocity, and potential cause (pun), isn’t something to be laughed at since some of these fast moving stars seem to have been found. Have you heard of these?

Wow! not heard of hypervelocity stars (or perhaps did before we knew what to make of them). We`d like to say that is just what we predicted, but truth is we were so focused on particles in the plasma around the galaxy, that it did not cross our mind for a second what would happen to a star out there. But, yes, that is what should happen to a star out there.
This statement alone: ,"Hypervelocity stars (HVSs) are stars with extremely high peculiar velocities relative to the velocity distribution of their parent population" should have had this article plastered all over our media.
The electrical engineers at least know the real definition of galactic potential.

This article really seems like a good piece of evidence for the theory that dark matter is gravitationally segregated charge in the plasma around the galaxy, The important part of the model being that the electric field is not greatest near the center of the galaxy, but in the halo. Way different than say those models where they tried to describe rotation curves by a 1/r line charge type field.

This is the answer to why galactic rotation rates climb again after some radius. We do know where the field starts increasing after all!

Their Black Hole isn't doing too good of a job gravitationally as it seems some stars are being shot out and most of the stars we have calculated in our neighborhood are also moving outwards. Then you have plasma jets and quasars and the poor Back Hole seems to be emitting more and more as the years go by. All of the Big Bang cosmology has already been overturned, but as in the days of Copernicus and Newton they are afraid of change and to embrace the unknown.

I would like to offer here a definition of time that is as little abstract as possible. What we want, I think, is a definition that describes time as something that we measure. Only that. One might call it an operational definition. This definition is not an explanation of what time means (or has come to mean) philosophically or epistemologically. It is an explanation of what time is in our experimental or everyday use of it.

I maintain that time is simply a measurement of movement. This is its most direct definition. Whenever we measure time, we measure movement. We cannot measure time without measuring movement. The concept of time is dependent upon the concept of movement. Without movement, there is no time. Every clock measures movement: the vibration of a cesium atom, the swing of pendulum, the movement of a second hand.

In this way time can be thought of as a distance measurement. When we measure distance, we measure movement. We measure the change in position. When we measure time, we measure the same thing, but give it another name. Why would we do this? Why give two names and two concepts to the same thing? Distance and Time. I say, in order to compare one to the other. Time is just a second, comparative, measurement of distance.

The measurement of time is necessary to the measurement of velocity. It may be that time was not even "invented," in the modern sense, until someone first thought of the idea of velocity. Velocity is the measurement of the change in position of one thing (the object in question) relative to the change in position of another thing (the cesium atom, or the pendulum, etc.). Once you have conceived of the idea of velocity in this way, you realize that it can be measured in only one way: Compare the unknown movement to a known movement. That is, find something in your world that moves as uniformly as possible, and let that be your clock. Then compare your unknown movement to the movement of your clock. That is what velocity is. [link to milesmathis.com]

This is a report that lays out the last 10 years discoveries and the next 10 years agenda in solar and space physics. It's just about 100% concerning plasma, magnetic fields, electric fields, interdisciplinary connected systems and sciences. So it's evident a revolution is underway and bite your tongue when you see the term reconnection. Really, it'll be okay!